9601
DF Suggestions / Re: Bigger Siege Engines
« on: October 21, 2009, 02:15:42 am »Interestingly I think one of the main reasons siege engines don't quite feel 'seigey' is because material damage does not yet exist. The primary purpose of a siege engine is to damage structures and eventually reduce the foe to a course rubble. As of now we just have to hope we hit quickly moving targets.
Not quite true. While many average generals used them this way, all of the great conquerers and empires used catapults and ballistae (and trebucets in the late middle ages) extensively in the field.
Alexander had a higher ration of artillery to his army than any modern army up until 1915. (At times, he had a catapult or ballista for evey three soldiers in his army). Rome used them so extensively that they created variants more useful against soldiers, the Scorpion and the Repeating Ballista (using a two man crew, the latter could fire a clip of bolts in a couple of minutes, while the former was essentially a very large crossbow on a stand). Generally, "siege engines" were used more against troops than fortifications.