Bay 12 Games Forum

Unfortunately our Wyvern and Nullify proposals are kinda tied together if you look at it. I think the poll would need to cover both at once, somehow v:

That's why I said I will run Village Emblem to do insane stuff like that. You will have an army* of low-lever chars to command, it will be easy to leave some behind v:
<sub>*Currently 20 or so villagers, and I didn't even plan further chapters

But knowing you people yer gonna somehow get casualties close to 0 anyways. I just feel it!</sub>

Quote from: Solymr on May 12, 2014, 10:41:40 am

Why do you want to take monster effectiveness out? >:V

So thunder isn't a weird anti creatyre catch all.

Besides, thunder has fair MT and there are many kinds of monster. Not super fair to get tons of bonus damage against all of them.

Plus Thunder has innate Crt rates, too.

Ah, I thought it was a joke at first.  If it's serious, and if you want us to be a bit more blasé towards loss rates, it might be better not to bar players from returning if their characters die.

I want to GM Fire Emblem to all players more or less interested, less or more experienced, not a group of eight or so nerds drooling over it all the time.
No offense, but it irks me greatly how some guys tend jump into recruitment and all slots get taken within hours.
I can easily point with my finger at some people who jumped into three, three different Fire Emblems here and would prolly jump into another if only someone went and hosted one.
_{I'm not better, but I know =P}

Quote from: Haspen on May 12, 2014, 10:16:15 am

Thunder tree is already Monster effective.

Wyvern =\= monster.

That's what I'm saying. If you want Thunder tomes to be vs Wyvern, then you better take off vs Monsters off the books, or I will veto :v

To be fair, Wyverns kinda got hit hard by the game mechanics merger - in individual games, they're arrow-weak like all fliers and always weak to Wyrmslayers and the like, but they tend to vary on other weaknesses.  In one game, they'll be wind-weak; in another, they'll be thunder-weak; in a third, they'll be Manakete-weak, but only if the Manakete has Wyrmslayer; and in a fourth, they won't be particularly affected by any of these, except insofar as their riders tend to have low RES.  I don't think any games have them give them all of the weaknesses across the board. 

Maybe that's a ringing bell to finally make Wyvern without Wyvern Scales pseudo-weakness-pseudo-strong stuff? I proposed one thing long ago:

Wyvern Rider Scales: +3 DEF vs Swords and Axes*
Wyvern Knight Scales: +3 DEF vs Swords, Axes, and +3 RES vs Fire magic*
_{*As long as they're mounted}

Somehow I don't think many remember.

Thunder tree is already Monster effective.

Well one trade initiation meaning a character can only go through the inventory of one other character during their turn.

That's most absurd thing ever.

I don't remember seeing a single FE video game that didn't let you trade with another person if that person have already traded in the same turn.