Just to avoid a massive quote pyramid, and to get the bad parts out of the way:
114.8*(((1000+1+1)^1.7030)/3) + 25*(1000) + 1
I realise that my notation wasn't very clear either, it should be:
114.8*((((1000+1+1)/3)^1.7030)) + 25*(1000) + 1
There was never any /z
Ahem:
This may help:
http://star-made.org/content/power-generation-cracking-codeMy first post in the thread starting to explain what's going on with power generation:
http://star-made.org/comment/18400#comment-18400Quick summary: The x, y, and z dimensions of each connected set of power generators determines primarily how much power it will generate, and this is exponential, until your total there ((xdim+ydim+zdim)/z)^1.7 or so starts to get up near 1 million. At that point gain starts to slow down. It won't go past 1 million. However you get 25 e/sec per power gen block in addition, so it's still possible to gain more power, just inefficiently.
(I'm Trafalgar on the star-made forums, by the way)
Also, engine thrust is calculated the exact same way as power. So you want long lines of engines or +-shaped engines, not individual engine units and not large blocks of engines, for maximum engine efficiency.
Taken from: first post.
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=127482.645I still maintain that the first equation(in the post in the spoiler) is incomplete in gives wrong values for everything.
*facepalm*
So that, you know, things aren't done to the wrong thing.
But clearly you don't need parenthesis around the whole equation, and around single numbers?
example:
(2*((3)+(5)))=2*(3+5)
All the redundant parenthesis obscure the important ones.
Nice equations
For all it's worth I really appreciate the effort!
Thanks for writing it out nicely for me!
I see there is kind of a "tool" gap between us, since I always use Maple for any sort of advanced maths(I can recommend it, makes writing the exponents in the correct way very easy), and you are accustomed to using a TI-89, and are writing notation that can be input into said calculator.
But I am glad you closed the gap by writing a notation I can understand

I have a couple of question:
Is the last part after 25*, just the total block count?
I'm gonna try writing up the 1000 stick problem, and see if I got it:
Tried it, and got a very low answer... then I spotted a missing negation!
I wrote it up in my own way:

And got just over 1 mio, which is the correct answer!
Woo! Maths!
Thanks again for writing it a way I can understand.