Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Bauglir

Pages: 1 ... 795 796 [797] 798 799 ... 813
11941
Just out of curiosity, why aren't obsidian walls formed on the edges of the pipe sticking to the interior wall (and then new obsidian sticking to those, etc)?

11942
General Discussion / Re: Crazy childhood rumors.
« on: April 08, 2010, 07:57:50 pm »
-snip-

11943
General Discussion / Re: Serious discussion: U.S. Military actions
« on: April 07, 2010, 11:26:14 pm »
-snip-

11944
General Discussion / Re: Serious discussion: U.S. Military actions
« on: April 07, 2010, 10:57:33 pm »
-snip-

11945
General Discussion / Re: An evolutionary thread.
« on: April 07, 2010, 10:33:54 pm »
-snip-

11946
DF Dwarf Mode Discussion / Re: This is not sand.
« on: April 07, 2010, 07:22:19 pm »
-snip-

11947
DF General Discussion / Re: Who is Footkerchief?
« on: April 07, 2010, 01:50:06 pm »
-snip-

11948
General Discussion / Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« on: April 06, 2010, 08:36:24 pm »
You're right of course that it's not relevant as an ethical point today, except of course that there are several million Palestinians who have been in exile for the past 60 years and nobody knows what to do with them. And of course I'd say it's ethically relevant to stress that fact, and to stress the pre-Israel history of Palestine. There's an Israeli group called Zochrot that posts signs and disseminates information about the Palestinian villages that were left empty after 1948 when their inhabitants weren't allowed to come back, which is the kind of of history lesson some nations face up to after the fact, but a lot of Israel has so far been reluctant to.

Course there's history denial on both sides, holocaust denial is quite common among uneducated Arabs, which stems from exactly the same motive as nakba denial or what have you, or any kind of revisionist history - an attempt to morally justify what your own side did by rewriting history to make your side undeniably the good guys, victims, or what have you.

Well, that's sensible enough, anyway. Countering people trying to whitewash their own pasts is a solid goal. Carry on, then.

11949
General Discussion / Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« on: April 06, 2010, 08:15:15 pm »
Quite frankly, you never made it clear that your context was only limited to the 20th century (except perhaps afterward), and I'm inclined to disagree that it matters who lived where when dealing with time spans greater than a single generation.

Personally, I'm interested in why it matters that Muslims lived in the area 100 years ago, but it doesn't matter that Jews did 2000 years ago. It doesn't really seem like either should really matter for informing current decisions, ethically speaking. Obviously it's necessary to understand the history to understand how the situation came to be as it is and to understand how best to deal with the cultures living there now, but that's more of a practical concern than an ethical one.

11950
General Discussion / Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« on: April 06, 2010, 08:00:07 pm »
Quote
Quote
So have plenty of other people. Relevance?
None to me.  When you whip out the "first" argument it's good to keep things in perspective.
I never whipped out that argument. I spent a good part of a post explaining why it was stupid. Are you even reading anything I write

In reality Israel bends over backwards rather than just kicking the whole muslim population out of their country

See this is part of the problem

The Muslims were there first and basically all they're asking for (besides the minority of extremists; the rest of the terrorists - who are also a minority I might add - join up with them because they grow up in apartheid ghettos under military occupation with no human rights) is to be able to live in their own country in peace

That's why I keep saying if you would change the conditions that Palestinians are forced to live in then terrorists would lose their support, it's that simple. They would become a bunch of fringe wackos with no foot soldiers to do the dirty work. The foot soldiers are poor kids who grew up in hell on earth with no future, and if they had better lives they would not join up with terrorists. There are plenty of Israelis who realize this. Unfortunately, they're not in power, and even when they are none of them have the balls to stand up to the settler movement.

That's why I think Israeli extremists are more dangerous and scary than Palestinian ones. (well, and the Israeli extremists have a government and army to do their dirty work for them). The Palestinian ones have been turned into extremists by being oppressed for decades. The Israeli ones are wackos who could live a perfectly comfortable life in Tel Aviv, or for that matter, in Brooklyn (where plenty of them come from) but insist that God wants them to conquer the promised land again

Emphasis mine. As I recall, that was why I posted here in the first place.

11951
General Discussion / Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« on: April 06, 2010, 10:46:01 am »
I completely agree that Israel's fucking things over, just to make it clear. I just think that any "I was here first" argument is complete bullshit, and it's not the reason WHY Israel is wrong. I happen to think that a lot of Palestinian methods are wrong, too, but given their opponent I can't come up with a better solution, all I can do is condemn the murders they do commit. Honestly, both sides need to try and make this a moral war, not a tactical war. The side that stops killing people to achieve their goals is the side likeliest to win in the end, but the trouble is nobody's willing to do that because everybody feels (somewhat justly) wronged.
I don't think either side can or should make it a "moral war." The only possible hope for peace is if Israel withdraws the settlers and the occupation, and meanwhile if everyday people make efforts to raise their kids to have respect for each other. One of the NGOs I might work with runs summer camps for that exact purpose. The idea being that if you have kids grow up seeing the other side as actual people (which you'd be amazed how little that happens) then they'll grow up into adults who will treat the situation like adults, as opposed to what's being done now.

Yeah, I pretty much agree with you, upon thinking about it. I more meant that, if either side wants to win, they're going to have to start working on getting the non-insane people on the other side to stop wanting to fight, which basically means taking away the REASON for them to fight. Which amounts to, "You guys killed my family." But yes, what you're talking about would be a far better solution overall, and good luck if that's the group you end up working with.

Quote
Quote
Actually, back on topic, this is what I meant with Quaritch. He's got a legitimate problem with the Na'vi, which is that they killed his friends and are a constant threat to his life and career. The trouble is, the Na'vi have a legitimate problem with the humans, which is that they're basically invading and conquering their homeland without any concern for the locals. The main problem with the analogy is that Quaritch chose to go to Pandora, which means he put himself in that situation, and that's really the only thing in my mind that really makes him out-and-out evil instead of a shades-of-grey-asshole. He's too prideful to realize that his problems were a clear and necessary outcome of his own choices about his life.

Yeah, again, an interesting character analysis - which I somehow doubt was actually present in the movie, given how shallow its characterization was :\ Still, the fact that he chose to go to Pandora would make me pretty unsympathetic to his loss of friends in fighting there.

Oh, you're right, it would be completely out of place if he actually had that sort of characterization when he was written, considering his surroundings. He's just the only one in the movie I can apply any sort of sensible motivation like that to, as everyone else really IS just acting completely black-and-whitely.

11952
General Discussion / Re: US military murders civs, reporters
« on: April 06, 2010, 08:52:37 am »
-snip-

11953
General Discussion / Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« on: April 06, 2010, 08:47:42 am »
I completely agree that Israel's fucking things over, just to make it clear. I just think that any "I was here first" argument is complete bullshit, and it's not the reason WHY Israel is wrong. I happen to think that a lot of Palestinian methods are wrong, too, but given their opponent I can't come up with a better solution, all I can do is condemn the murders they do commit. Honestly, both sides need to try and make this a moral war, not a tactical war. The side that stops killing people to achieve their goals is the side likeliest to win in the end, but the trouble is nobody's willing to do that because everybody feels (somewhat justly) wronged.

Again, you miss the point that "I was there first" isn't automatically invalid. If by "I" I mean, myself, as in, I was living there in my house and was kicked out to make room for somebody else, and right now I'm living somewhere else because I was kicked out from the house that I was probably going to leave to my children when I die, and dude, that TV you're watching, I bought it, and you're eating my food, I was right there like ten minutes ago and you kicked me out because your caveman great-great-great-ancestor lived in a cave that used to be under my garage, versus "I was there first" as in, hey, I'm descended from Aztecs so I have the right to break into the Mexican's president house and kick his ass out on the street and move to his couch.


Yeah, except that's not the case any more because a lot of Israelis were born in Israel and have lived there their whole lives. BOTH sides have that claim now, is my point. It's not a case of one guy moving in and shoving the old tenant out anymore. It's a case of "My parents threw your parents out of this house before I was ever born, because their great-great-grandparents lived here before your great-great-grandparents kicked THEM out, and now you're saying we should get out of the house we grew up in just because you have some "ancestral claim"? Sure, maybe it's your TV, but that's my stove, and I'm the one who remodeled the basement."

11954
General Discussion / Re: An evolutionary thread.
« on: April 05, 2010, 10:59:04 pm »
-snip-

11955
General Discussion / Re: Let's discuss 'Avatar.'
« on: April 05, 2010, 10:51:27 pm »
I completely agree that Israel's fucking things over, just to make it clear. I just think that any "I was here first" argument is complete bullshit, and it's not the reason WHY Israel is wrong. I happen to think that a lot of Palestinian methods are wrong, too, but given their opponent I can't come up with a better solution, all I can do is condemn the murders they do commit. Honestly, both sides need to try and make this a moral war, not a tactical war. The side that stops killing people to achieve their goals is the side likeliest to win in the end, but the trouble is nobody's willing to do that because everybody feels (somewhat justly) wronged.

Actually, back on topic, this is what I meant with Quaritch. He's got a legitimate problem with the Na'vi, which is that they killed his friends and are a constant threat to his life and career. The trouble is, the Na'vi have a legitimate problem with the humans, which is that they're basically invading and conquering their homeland without any concern for the locals. The main problem with the analogy is that Quaritch chose to go to Pandora, which means he put himself in that situation, and that's really the only thing in my mind that really makes him out-and-out evil instead of a shades-of-grey-asshole. He's too prideful to realize that his problems were a clear and necessary outcome of his own choices about his life.

Pages: 1 ... 795 796 [797] 798 799 ... 813