Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - palsch

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 138
151
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 30, 2016, 08:58:52 am »
It isn't even just Brexit as far as Labour is concerned.

Today's anti-Semitism meeting was called weeks ago, after a number of statements eventually resulted in ex-London mayor Ken Livingstone being suspended for making stupid comparisons to Hitler. It just happened to fall on the worst possible day for Corbyn, whose hard-left group is commonly seen as susceptible to anti-Semitic conspiracies and views.

There is also the Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war due to be published next week, which is likely to further inflame tensions between the Blairites and the anti-war left. That was always going to be a shitshow. Now it is just going to be piling more on to the ongoing.

153
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 30, 2016, 08:20:48 am »
I swear this whole thing is like the incarnation of a katamari clusterfuck. Everything just keeps rolling into a larger tangle of snafus.

I think we are way past the point of satire being dead.

EDIT: Waaaaay past.
Quote
11.55 Jewish MP Ruth Smeeth has left the anti-Semitism event in tears after an audience member has accused of of “colluding” with The Daily Telegraph to undermine Corbyn.

154
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 30, 2016, 07:53:25 am »
Oh no. I was really looking forward to the political cartoons of Boris VS Stalin Putin.

We should get some good ones out of Gove stabbing him in the back.

For those not following the minutiae of the Tory leadership kerfuffle, Gove originally backed Boris and there were rumours he would be his chancellor. Then Boris fucked up badly a couple of times. He first managed to publish his vision for exit that included retaining the freedom of movement and had to completely denounce his own article. He then was supposed to meet with Remain MPs and abandoned the meeting 15 minutes before it started. Somewhere along the line he is also rumoured to have refused to promise Gove a job.

Meanwhile Rupert Murdoch said he would quite like to see Gove as the leader, despite Gove having ruled himself out of the running. For his part Gove had remained mostly silent since the referendum.

So last night an email from Gove's wife was leaked warning that Boris would a terrible leader. Gove's wife, by the by, is Sarah Vine who writes for the Daily Mail. The email raised doubts about the support Boris would have and his capability as leader.

Meanwhile polls showed that May was trouncing Johnson among the Conservative membership, while having retained a rather strong position by staying mostly out of the debate. She is viewed as a natural Leaver who stayed loyal to the government by backing Remain, but quietly. She is also viewed as a potentially strong leadership figure, if not the second coming of the Iron Lady herself. She had started her campaign by ripping Boris to shards over his negotiating abilities and the time she overruled him over the use of water cannons in London.

Then today Gove announces only hours before the deadline and Boris ends up pulling out of the race only minutes before it begins. He was quickly backed by a number of senior figures, including Nicky Morgan. According to one leaked text message, Boris's camp think this was a planned coup from Gove's side from the very beginning, so it may be that Gove no longer gets the support of the united Leave campaign.

The stories that should come out of this are going to put most political farces to shame.


EDIT: And it gets better.
Quote
I'm told Boris' widely criticised @Telegraph column - was SUB EDITED by Michael Gove who suggested changes - and Boris put them in

155
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 30, 2016, 06:01:30 am »
BoJo not running for Conservative leader/Prime Minister.

Now it looks like Gove vs May vs Crab.

156
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 30, 2016, 04:25:29 am »
JP Morgan's base case for Brexit. Looks like it was leaked by a journalist, so have a mirror in case.

There are still wildcards there, but this seems a plausible path to me. Not a nice one, but plausible.

157
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 30, 2016, 01:22:24 am »
The situation with foreign residents is a little complicated.

Pretty much all politicians have declared they can remain if they are already here, and it is even questionable under international law if they can be kicked out. In principle revoking a treaty doesn't remove the residency rights someone gained under that treaty.

That probably won't make some of the 'we voted leave, now get out' crowd happy, but it is what it is.

The problems are more to do with healthcare and pensions. A huge swathe of the British expatiates in Spain and France are retired and so depend heavily on the deals that were struck through the EU. In particular those who retire to countries within the common market see their pensions pegged to local inflation/wage increases. Outside the common market your pension is frozen at the level it was when you retired. Combine that with the possibility of nations choosing to charge healthcare costs out of pocket rather than through the NHS payment schemes set up and you could see a lot of pensioners with growing costs and shrinking (in real terms) income.

The only realistic retaliation in that scenario would be denying EU nationals in the UK benefits or access to the NHS, which could be tricky to justify legally if they are tax payers.

158
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 29, 2016, 03:47:16 am »
So did they actually get out of the EU, or did they crawl back apologizing?
I am a bit out of touch with current events.

The referendum was advisory only. The UK voted to leave, but now the government has to work out what to actually do. Currently that is run around on fire.

159
General Discussion / Re: Brexit! Conversation Continued
« on: June 29, 2016, 12:25:57 am »
Just to clarify some confusion I saw in the other thread about Corbyn, he can be forced out. But it isn't simple.

The vote of no confidence was no more binding than the referendum, and only showed the views of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP), excluding the 20 MEPs who weren't invited to my knowledge. It arguably makes his position untenable but doesn't end it.

However, a leadership election can be triggered if one or more MP gets the backing of at least 20% of the PLP. If ~51 Labour MPs/MEPs can rally behind a single candidate then there will be a leadership contest.

The problem is that Corbyn is seen as the easy favourite, as the two big lobbies are his Momentum group (~8,000 members but tens of thousands of supporters) and the unions, both of which still back him. He won without the PLP last time and could easily do it again, likely triggering a split in the Labour party or at least a number of defections.

There is conflicting legal advice over whether Corbyn can be kept from the ballot. Essentially he doesn't believe he needs the 20% support and that as the current leader he should automatically be on the ballot. His opponents have advice saying he would need that 20% support, which looks unlikely given he only had 40 MPs backing him in the confidence motion and that number has decreased since. So there could be a court battle that decides whether Corbyn can face the challenge at all or is simply deposed by lawyers.

In that case I'd expect to see Corbyn and his core supporters jump party, although where they go depends on if they can count on union support or not. Expect to see a lot of meetings between his potential challengers and the big unions in the coming days.

160
General Discussion / Re: Breeki British Brexit thread
« on: June 28, 2016, 03:58:13 pm »
But... they didn't disagree with anything the EU was doing and what they did want to do the UK could have done anyhow (speaking of the moderates here)

For a lot of people (including some I work with) it was about the principle of the thing. They don't like that the EU can create laws that apply to the UK. Of course, those laws are enacted by Parliament and they can rarely name any that they disagree with or that they can't be convinced are sensible (such as fishery quotas).

There is also a fear that we will be dragged into the ever closer union, despite having negotiated an explicit exemption from that. Others believe that the EU in its current form is beyond reform and unsustainable. There are genuine debates to be had about these questions, but they require nuance and level headed debate, which a referendum doesn't exactly lend itself to.

For most British voters the EU is a black box who they are told have some control over their lives, and which has been used as scapegoat for a few decades now. Boris famously made his name in journalism by reporting outlandish stories about the EU from Brussels. I've seen a story about other journalists deliberately feeding him more and more absurd stories to see how extravagant the lies he would publish could get.

Trying to overturn these decades of misinformation and blame in a six week campaign was impossible, and trying to educate people on real problems within the EU would be counterproductive, because they would first have to understand how it works and why the lies are so badly wrong.


To be fair, the EU is incredibly complex, especially the UK's relationship with it. We are the exception in almost every case, and our weird system of national government makes it even more complicated. You have to have an understanding of how British constitutional law works alongside European law, as well as how the European political system is structured to really see why Brexit was completely futile. But few people are going to go and study what could easily be a multi-part university course just to tick a box at the ballot.

161
General Discussion / Re: Breeki British Brexit thread
« on: June 28, 2016, 03:32:04 pm »
The conservative government couldn't have enacted a single one of those policies without the coalition government.  The Libs said that election reform was the reason to pick the tories over labor but they didn't get election reform, instead they got a silly farce of a referendum.  It was such poor negotiating on the part of the Libs that it would take Donald Trump to properly disparage their bargaining skills.

There were many reasons to take the Tories over Labour in 2010. The AV referendum was a Labour manifesto pledge that they refused to fully support during the initial Lib/Lab coalition talks and eventually sabotaged by failing to campaign as a unified party. Labour were a fractured party (the lines eventually settling into the battle between the Miliband brothers) and a minority or rainbow coalition would have crumbled quickly. Not to mention that, in 2010, Labour had been overseeing a grossly illiberal government.

So... The Leavers were tricked into thinking they were creating migration policies that benefited their view of the UK but really there was never any intent of going through with it?

Yep.

Not to mention that most moderate leavers would prefer to keep freedom of movement, it being core to our economic agreements with Europe and all.

So why campaign for Leave? Is it for some future election?

The Conservative leadership battle we are seeing forming up now. There was a Conservative right/Eurosceptic contingent available and Boris wanted it. Others, mostly backbenchers and UKIPers were genuinely out of principle, but the main leaders saw a chance to raise their profile on the right. The more stringent figures were outside the official campaign.

162
General Discussion / Re: Breeki British Brexit thread
« on: June 28, 2016, 02:53:25 pm »

163
General Discussion / Re: Breeki British Brexit thread
« on: June 28, 2016, 02:18:51 pm »
Anyone who cares about this sort of thing wouldn't be caught dead voting for the Lib Dems after the shitshow that was the Conservative-Liberal government.  Maybe the Greens can benefit.
I think that people who are actually paying attention would.

I mean, it has become obvious to many that the Lib Dems were holding back the Conservative government considerably and managed to get a decent amount of their manifesto policies passed, even if some were watered down and others ended up being claimed by the Tories. Then you have the current pledge to remain in or rejoin the EU which will be popular with many who voted remain or who feel conned by the leave campaigns. Plus I've seen people praising Clegg (!) for having a very clear vision of the results of a leave vote (notably this and this).

Literally the only thing continuing to hold back the Lib Dems is tuition fees, and that is becoming harder and harder to tag them with as time goes on.

I can imagine a couple of MPs defecting if Corbyn wins and there isn't a complete schism in the Labour party. I've seen one previously high-profile Labour supporter switch today, along with one member per minute being reported, and it is the Lib Dems who are making themselves visibly the party of Remain.

Of course, if Corbyn loses it would be more likely to see a swing towards the Greens, and all of this assumes the party doesn't actually split. I think that particular question depends on the unions and whether they accept the results either way.

164
General Discussion / Re: Breeki British Brexit thread
« on: June 28, 2016, 11:08:10 am »
Yep. Now time to look up the rules that govern how to trigger an actual leadership election in Labour (oddly the confidence vote isn't enough...). Watch for the whips resigning.

Ah, they simply need a challenger with 20% of the PLP backing them. I believe the magic number is still the 35 who backed Corbyn. Whoops, 51 MPs and MEPs. May be difficult with the way the party is fractured.

Late edit: Corbyn would also require 51 to appear on the ballot. Labour List are reporting only 40 MPs voted for him in the confidence vote, with the other 4 reported elsewhere actually abstaining. That would mean he needs at least 11 Labour MEPs (out of 20) or to swing some of those MPs.
It gets worse.

There is conflicting legal advice over whether Corbyn needs the nomination from MPs to be on the ballot. If he is on he will likely win among the general membership (still has the strong backing from Momentum and the unions), and whether or not he is may well be the result of a court case. That could make the fight even more bitter.

The Lib Dems and Greens should be recruiting a lot of new members and possibly an MP or two from this.

165
General Discussion / Re: Breeki British Brexit thread
« on: June 28, 2016, 10:57:31 am »
The Momentum group, formed out of those who supported Corbyn's original run for leader, are seeing a surge in membership alongside a petition of support for Corbyn. Earlier a Labour MP called for the group to be banned, believing it was threatening to drag Labour to the left and make them unviable as a party, in part by running deselection campaigns against moderate/centrist Labour MPs. A poll suggests the group does support such action against those opposing Corbyn, although it is outside their official stance.

If Corbyn doesn't appear on the leadership ballot there could be big trouble on the hard left.



Meanwhile Johnson says he won't call a general election if he wins the Conservative leadership (and PM office) and that he will outline his vision of a Brexit during his campaign based on the mandate from the referendum.

This is after an aide apparently said his proposals the other day came while tired and don't represent an actual proposal. Which makes me really confident in his negotiating abilities.

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 138