616
General Discussion / Re: American Election Megathread
« on: January 03, 2012, 03:37:56 am »Nah, it has been proven to work.
It doesn't work very well, but it still works to some degree, although there are far better and more effective means to reduce criminal activity.
No actually it doesn't.
His brutal human rights abuses are ineffective, and this is fact.
So please, when you say 'it has been proven to work', what did you mean, exactly? Further, let's propose a highly theoretical situation: how can you accept literal psychological and physical abuse, racism, and instilling terror into communities, even if it had been proven 'effective'? Are you actually going to say that letting a sociopath tyrant abuse his authority to ruin people as he sees fit is alright if he 'gets the job done'? Are you truly going to weigh crimes against another in that fashion? Are you going to weigh theft and drug use and 'being brown skinned' against over one hundred million dollars worth of taxpayer money being misused, actual concentration camps, actual negligent deaths, actual racism, actual civil rights abuse, actual fraud, and actual psychological torture? Can you really judge him favorably in that scenario, even if he had reduced crime statistics?
Can you step back, and take that information in, and realize that he has done all of that and crime statistics in his jurisdiction have rocketed upwards? That he has made his county a racially segregated zone? That he has brought terror and sorrow to his community?
Can anyone honestly do that and not think that Joe Arpaio is nothing to be respected, and everything to be despised?