Look, if I want to argue that he has
never done
anything useful, is it really a good idea to only point to
one post? You seem to think the answer is "yes". Why?
You want me to explain why I call zombie's posts scummy? All right, I'll point to The One Big Example, since you seem to prefer that.
zombie urist, if you were scum, would deliberately let yourself get killed if it meant that your buddy was likely to go one and win?
Probably. It really depends on who my partner was and how skillful he is. I don't know how I can "deliberately let" myself get lynched without doing something really stupid.
He basically said "maybe, depending on everything". So tell me, in what way is that
not scummy?
Also, I did ask you a question. You gonna answer it or should I just assume this whole thing has been a scum ruse?
The question is, basically, "Why did you do this thing that you explained while you were doing it?" Why is that not a shitty question? If you wanted to claim his questions weren't shitty, that's probably the single worst one to point to -- why did you choose that one?