There's not an obligation to take in more than you can handle. And there're approaches that work better than others, in terms of the way you aid them, long-term. But dismissing human rights in the name of egoism, 'enlightened self-interest' (I notice most people who like that term only really use half of it), and moral relativism simply because your opponents use the term is not the solution. For one thing, it helps them, because looking like you don't give a shot about anyone but you and yours isn't great for convincing people, for some reason. Why should anyone else give a shit about your opinion od you can't even being yourself to care about oi that people dying and living in fear? If you're unable to dredge up any empathy?
There is no obligation to take any of them. In exactly zero European countries have the people been asked about their opinions when it comes the phenomenon and related issues and questions at hand. If in a democracy my opinion, a law-abiding tax-paying citizen's voice and opinion, doesnt count, why should anyone else's? EU is getting more and more integrated while the EU citizens do NOT want to get integrated and become a federation. And no its not just about rapes or medievalish muslim culture both of which I dislike. Nor about the fact that most of the people coming here are young men.
because looking like you don't give a shot about anyone but you and yours isn't great for convincing people
I do not need to convince people, I have an opinion and so do many others, and all those should count. Your thought seems to be that my opinion really doesnt even matter because its "selfish" somehow? Your perception of what is democracy differs from mine. At the moment we too, like the Brits and many others, have a government that has eaten its words several times over as have the political parties and individual politicians starting from the PM himself.
Maybe its you who should try reading again. I'm not against helping people who need protection. If you feel you arent getting through, can explain yourself about how immigration politics and gun control debates are both about public security versus individual freedoms.
PS. around here you're going to jail if you use more force than what was used on you ie. defending yourself is in practice illegal. One cant even fight back and defend oneself against "darkies" trying to rape with a knife or gas if they havent already used similar weapons on you. Rapes by foreigners have gone up 46 % from last year and all it took was 30k "refugees", a tiny, less than half-a-percent minority, is committing more than half of them all. I cant defend myself in any legal way and if I go out after dark and get raped/robbed/beaten its basically my own fault. Because I didnt vote right, oh, I did, but it doesnt count because now I'm a racist.
The times we live are getting a bit too interesting to my liking.
edit, I felt the need to provide some sources too. From the police department, statistics on foreign citizens in crime,
2014-20152015 January to June vs. 2016 January to JuneThe latter one in google translateRapes up by 6%, suspect foreign citizen up by 46%. Sexual harassment up by 150%, by foreigners
450%. Violent assaults went down by 2%, but numbers of assaults committed by foreigners went up by 38%.
All it took was 30k, mostly young men, refugees. Keeping them just fed and dry is about 1,5 million € every day.