Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Erkki

Pages: 1 ... 135 136 [137] 138 139 ... 174
2041
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 20th
« on: June 15, 2011, 11:58:16 am »
Been following this, and made a new account (cause I forgot my old one) to reply.  Made me start playing as well.  I must say, pretty impressed with your progress.

Any chance a fighter pilot spot is still open?  Preferably on one of the new carriers.

I'll look one for you aboard Hiyo, or one of the fresh replacements to "older" carriers that are now going through refits... I'm also going to resize the units to take max advantage of on-board torpedoes and aircraft capacity - and I'm going to need a lot of fighter pilots doing that.

Related to our carriers.. The floatplane cruiser CS Nisshin is also on her way to Truk. Just to keep my opponent on his toes, I think I'm going to burn up some fuel, raiding with carriers. Probably in 3 squadrons of 2... Shoho and Zuiho counting as one carrier. If I dont lose any of the oilers that are now on their way to Truk, we can go beyond Hawaiian islands and stay there for quite a while. As we dont have to expect enemy carriers we can drop the fuel-hog battleships too. Nisshin's and her 20 float planes will, in the initial plans, sweep ahead with a small cruiser surface action raider squadron or 2, heavies behind them.

I'd like to go Fiji-Hawaii or Australia-Fiji-Samoa (halfway to Hawaii) first as its guaranteed to have traffic, and we might run into that big BB force that was spotted yesterday. Maybe even carriers. Having the surprise will be essential, so we cant afford getting spotted by Catalinas or other search aircraft, and infiltrating into the Southern Coral Sea might prove to be difficult. I'm going to try it any way.

2042
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 20th
« on: June 15, 2011, 03:19:14 am »
June 24th

Burma: 2nd Raiders finally gets attrited. Tomorrow we will have cut Chiang Mai from supplies, other than what they can bring through 120 nautical miles of mountainous rain forest.

China: more local victories... During the past week the Chinese must have lost perhaps 2 months' worth of infantry squads alone, while all our losses are quickly replaceable.

Java: Merak in the northernmost tip of the island falls to the Japanese, in the south, the big stack of surviving Dutch units is pushed to the extreme southernmost peninsula. They will be dealth with within a week.  :)

Other news: The USN destroyer DD Blue is now confirmed to have been sunk by IJN carriers Shokaku and Zuikaku at Luganville during the Fiji-Espiritu Santo raid 3 weeks ago.

2 new aircraft enter production in 4 weeks. These are the new, armored Ki-49 "Donryu" bomber and the A6M3a, A6M3's carrier capable version. (Dont let the arrival dates in the Tracker screenshots confuse you, A6M3a enters production by July 20th or 21st, Ki-49 earlier, first week of July).

As you can see, the Ki-49 is considerably better choice if any fighter opposition or AAA is expected(as its faster, has more guns and especially armor)... It also has slightly better range, and shares the same engine with the Ki-44 fighter that we will begin to product in August. The Ki-21-IIa will stay in production for at least a couple of months more.

Spoiler: Ki-21 vs. Ki-49 (click to show/hide)

The A6M3a has nice range, even longer than M2, and while speed drops marginally from M3, the maneuverability is higher by 1 and is so its still overall easily the better fighter. It also uses a better type of 20mm cannons, and is carrier capable. The M2 will be phased from production and front-line use ASAP, as the M3a enters mass production. There are some 600 Zeroes in operational squadrons so the conversion will take some time... Comparison with M2 below.


edit: fixed screenshots..

2043
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 20th
« on: June 14, 2011, 05:16:38 pm »
Hey, you didn't answer about Chongkin. Does loosing it is really bad for the Chinese? Can you force a separate Chinese surrender?

Ops, sry... Chungking as a city isnt more important than, say, Sian I already captured. Industry in it generates supply, but the heavy industry in all of China will probably be shut down within half a year as I own their oil, or the roads there, at least. Light industry will keep rolling.

All Chinese reinforcements will arrive at Chungking, so yeah, getting it would be nice. But its still a long way there and will at minimum take 3-4 months, and I'm expecting heavy resistance, possibly even British or American units from India and Burma.

2044
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 20th
« on: June 14, 2011, 05:11:22 pm »
June 23rd

Burma: 2nd Raiders barely holding... The enemy brought a whole tank regiment. They have the firepower but they sunk in rocky jungle. Despite rated 27:1 odds they didnt break the crack paratroopers!

Air war:

Our bombers(50% of them, actually) fly today over Burma. Estimated damage to enemy is only minor, however...

4 P-400 Airacobras hit Moulmein's port: the sole Ki-43 guided to intercept damages 2, and the AAA 2 more. They achieve nothing. Now what was this?!?

Our air attack on Buna is a success: there are only 12 P-40Bs, probably from Port Moresby, patrolling. At least 6 of them are shot down with 5 damaged(3 heavy damage, so likely kills), we losing 4 Zeroes and 3 pilots, all reasonably low trained, and from the unit that was assigned to escort the bombers(as opposed to sweeping ahead). The runway and facilities damage is probably fixed quick, but we also got 5 Hudsons as confirmed and at least damaged 30-ish planes more.

B-17s hit Manus island in all their might. Even as low as 8,000ft against no AAA fire, all 40 of them score only 10 hits in port facilities and supply dumps. I know that flying an offensive sortie with a B-17 means using 6 tons of supply... So he used 240 tons of supplies, + maybe 100 for aircraft maintenance, to bomb perhaps 5 tons of mine. I hope he lost a bomber or 2 for operational reasons...  8)

2045
I have now 16,5k drinks, 11k prepared meals, 200 plants, 1200 seeds for 160 dwarves. And expanding. Who knows, maybe I'll once be unable to farm, lose half of my fort including the farmers, cooks and brewers, or have to quarantine parts of it thanks to some paralysis/rot syndrome pandemia?

2046
DF Dwarf Mode Discussion / Re: What's going on in your fort?
« on: June 14, 2011, 10:58:28 am »
In Actionpaints, my militia commander is one bad ass looking, and behaving, Dwarf... Unlike his fighting pair Dumed, he doesnt like one-shotting in the head with his silver mace, but instead makes sure he hits every single body part, bone, joint and organ, keeping the target alive and conscious as long as possible. He doesnt have many kills yet(only 13 I think, vs. 30+ of some of my spear equipped soldiers) but every kill is exponentially more pain.

Double braids ftw...


2047
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 20th
« on: June 14, 2011, 05:43:22 am »
Ahah, if every time he assemble a force of more than a couple destroyer it get crushed by the Kido Butai, he'll get discourage very fast.

What happen if you take Chongkin?

Ideal situation would be Allied reinforcement convoy to Guadalcanal or Tulagi, or amphibious operation in the same area supported by his CVs and BBs vs. Kido Butai + 200 land-based bombers and 200 land based fighters.. Tulagi is just in range of the Zero!  :)

2048
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 20th
« on: June 14, 2011, 05:21:08 am »
So we might actually end up with Rangoon? Are we still blockading it?

Yes, we're still blockading Rangoon. During the last month he only sent one 3-ship suicide convoy, that was sunk before it unloaded a single tea bag...

I'm hoping to get Rangoon(in 1,5 to 2 months), but it might prove impossible. At the least I'm hoping to force him to retreat locally, push the front forward and deny him Chiang Mai he can now supply via paved roads... And once its ours, it can be supplied via rail from Bangkok.


June 22nd


China: Japanese troops open a new supply road to the North: 90,000 Japanese troops assault over a river in mountainous terrain against what is(/now was) a full Chinese corps: Chinese losses are over 5,000, and this unit lost almost all of its equipment and probably over 99% of its strength for the cost of just 100 Japanese troops. The Chinese were forced to retreat in the forests, across a river, and suffered even more losses. This battle is a tactical victory that opened us the path into the central Chinese plains, and we now directly threaten the Chinese captal, Chunking.



Burma: 2nd Raiders fights gallantly against the superior enemy! The last still working AT gun's crew destroys a British tank today. Reinforcements are still a week from arriving... 7 Hurricanes try to achieve local air superiority, but Ki-43s shoot 3 of them down(+ at least heavily damaging 2 Hurricanes more) to no Japanese loss.


South Pacific: Japanese submarine finds an Allied convoy off Fiji:

      DD Aaron Ward
      BB North Carolina
      CA Minneapolis
      CA Louisville
      CA Northampton
      CA Indianapolis
      CL Nashville
      CL Helena
      CL St. Louis
      CLAA San Juan
      CLAA Atlanta
      DD Gilmer
      DD Worden
      DD Hull

Well well.. OK. Looks like the Indianapolis survived the torpedo hit it suffered 3 months ago, and is now back in action. Also Japanese SignInt finally confirms the CV Enterprise to be still afloat, as I though... That still makes 3 confirmed CV kills: Lexington, Saratoga and Yorktown. I am csure that the Prince of Wales is still in the area, as are probably the British carriers and the surviving American ones, at least the Hornet. The Imperial Strategic HQ is unsure if the Wasp, that left the Mediterranean 2 months ago, has yet made it to the Pacific.

This indicident confirms the enemy to be reinforcing the area, possibly in preparations of an amphibious operation somewhere in the Solomons, or even Gilberts... I'm not going to react, even as Carrier Division I now at Truk might be able to catch this force, but I have decided to not, yet, upgrade the Shokaku, but instead reform the original "Big Six": Kaga, Shoho and Zuiho with heavy escorts will depart Singapore for Truk this evening, and the already loaded replenishment oilers now spread around the Indonesia will be moved to either Truk or Hollandia on the northern coast of New Guinea, to keep them safe from enemy submarines.

Zuikaku's upgrade is ready in 7 days, and she'll be back at Truk by July 15th. The Carrier Divisions I and II will then have 6 fleet CVs and 2 CVLs, and we are again ready to hit the enemy, hit him hard.

2049
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 20th
« on: June 13, 2011, 07:12:21 am »
Ouch, last week was underwhelming. Do you have plan to prevent the allies from falling back on Rangoon?

Yeah, we should be able to advance via rail and dirt roads way, way faster than they can retreat through mountainous jungle while they're being bombed... I dont expect to be encircle more than maybe half a division equivalent and beat another one mano et mano, but after that they're at Pegu which is clear terrain, and where we can bomb them to dust... Unless they retreat to Rangoon where they can be encircled.

2050
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 20th
« on: June 12, 2011, 04:53:53 pm »
June 21st

Burma:

Allied reinforcements reach Chiang Mai, but fail to dislodge the 2nd Raiders, despite of our bombers not flying today. 12 Hurricanes fly a ground support mission, achieving nothing, and the half a dozen Ki-43s flying CAP shot down 3 Hurricanes and damage some more, but lose 3 of their own number as well, plus 2 more as written off.

7th Inf Div supported by an armored regiment starts it march up the railroad... This is going to be more messy than intended, not the least because I should have flown recon to check for possible enemy reinforcements, but so far, I have no doubt that we are going to win this one. In the tactical sense at least.


New Guinea air war:

Allies refuse to fly their fighters, so 80 Zeroes find just thin air and clouds, missing all the action: 50 4-engined heavy bombers strike Kavieng's port, sinking 2 transports that were already hit by submarines. Genzan Ku S-1 supported by Rabaul's Zeroes manage to shoot down as many as 5 bombers, AAA claiming the 6th kill. HQ crew estimated the enemy to have lost 2 or 3 more as written off or crashed due damage or as OPS.

30 Japanese G3M2s hit Finschafen, torching 3 P-39s and closing the air field. Some more planes are hit, and the field facilities are probably so damaged that the whole place will be down for a month.

Our losses today are 3 Zeroes (1 pilot WIA) and 5 Ki-43s(2 KIA, 2 MIA) to 3+ Hurricanes, 3+ P-39s, 6+ heavy bombers + possible non-combat ops losses.

2051
DF Dwarf Mode Discussion / Re: What's going on in your fort?
« on: June 12, 2011, 02:19:49 pm »
A few seasons later, the annual dwarf caravan arrived and of course so did the annual ambush. This time a single squad of swordsgoblins and a bowgoblin leader. Who opened the ambush by hitting the same trainee axedwarf who got hit by an arrow in the previous battle. That is just not this dwarves year. This goblin however, shall remain in the histories of Parchedroads because he is the killer of the 4th Militia Captain of the hammerdwarf squad who had gained a big name and so was not acceptable. The craven goblin waited until the dwarf turned his back on him while he was slaughtering his goblin companions before hitting him in the back of the head. I think this squad is cursed because every fight, someone goes down. I'm thinking of disbanding this squad all-together because it only brings regular death to my dwarves...

I too, in my first proper fort, had a squad that got a new captain each year... I think it had 7 or 8 captains. Almost half of my military losses were captain from squad 3. Jump in murky pool, frozen river thawing, falling off bridge, 20-tile bolt that missed intended target and hit a captain in the throat just he came around the corner, getting gang-banged by 20 goblins etc...

2052
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 20th
« on: June 12, 2011, 12:49:27 pm »
*Declares his lurker status again*


I'm going to have to scroll through 20 pages of this and catch up, but as its Erkki, its totally worth it  :P

Since the Battle of Gilberts, not much really. Some hilariously one sided air battles and 2 carriers raids, the other that almost caught the Prince of Wales.

Have nearly all of the Indonesia now, getting Port Moresby would be coup dé grace but I have no resources to do that yet. At the moment I have begun a new offensive in Burma with my 2 reinforcement divisions, in hopes of getting to Rangoon at least. China front is going well, for now, but theres still a lot of work left before I can stop the offensives.

2053
Play With Your Buddies / Re: War in the Pacific: AE PBEM - June 12th
« on: June 12, 2011, 05:33:13 am »
June 20th


Timor Sea:

So it happens that the whole raid is complete waste of precious ships and fuel. Both divisions bombard, but engage the coastal defense batteries instead of the city itself or air field. They do destroy or disable just about every single battery but killing approximately 300 men and 40 guns wasnt worth this... On the top of it all, Yamashiro receives a couple of 155mm hits in the weakly armored superstructure and while the damage is light, to get her 100% ready again she needs to be dry docked. Bah.

Thanks to the failing bombardments, the air raids meet over 30 P-39s, and we lose 9 G4M1s and 6 Ki-43s to pathetic 2 P-39s (+2 possibles) and 7 runway hits and damage some parked bombers.


Burma:

the rest of the 2nd Raiders has now been moved in, and after day of Japanese bomber strikes the Allies counter attack(what seems to be an Australian armoured regiment!!) - the paratroopers stand their ground and the 3 AT guns do well. Tomorrow the transport planes will start dropping in supplies.

Up the road from Pegu, the Allies seem to already have reinforcements coming in... But ours are also advancing up the rail road. From the looks of it, I dont think the Allies will be able to dislodge the 2nd Raiders before our infantry arrives, and once the railroad connection is cleared we will rail in the 20,000 troops of 33rd and 7th infantry divisions.


New Guinea: P-39s from Finschafen strafe Japanese troops at Medang, achieving nothing. After that, 80 Japanese bombers with Zero escorts hit their air field... They score, reported, 55 runway hits, 30 facility hits and torch 4 planes: at least 1 P-39 and a Catalina Also over 15 planes are reported at least damaged. There are 22 fighters and over 40 unidentified planes spotted, so we are going to repeat these strikes tomorrow, but with heavy fighter sweeps as the enemy most likely will CAP from Buna. There was no AAA fire so the raids will go in at a pretty low altitude in order to score more hits.

2054
DF Dwarf Mode Discussion / Re: Weaponizing a dragon?
« on: June 11, 2011, 09:50:39 am »
Last I heard a creature like a dragon won't use a breath attack or webbing on a creature unless they can path to the creature. If that is still true, B is still possible, but it will require a bit of dwarven mechanical engineering to do.

EDIT: The wiki page for Giant Cave Spiders has a silk farming design that could probably be weaponized for your needs.

Also, constructions don't burn.  The walls could be wood and no harm would come to it.  I think only grass spreads fire in the way you are thinking.  However, your target goblins' corpses and gear WILL burn, and do so for some time.  If a dwarf picks up any of it they will also catch fire and can spread the fire that way.

c sounds foolproof, I see nothing that could go wrong with that, other than the usual stuff.  Just make sure the bridge is fire safe (or to be sure magma safe) because unlike walls bridges can catch fire/melt.  There's also a chance for trolls to destroy that bridge, so be careful with them around and have a backup method to get into the room without pissing off Ms. Dragon so you could rebuild the bridge if needed.

RGR. Regarding path to target creature... Would having a path through a closed floor hatch(on a higher z level to prevent dragon from destroying it) work?

And on the bridge protecting the dragon: I'll probably have 1-tile moat before it so the trolls cant reach it, and all the targets will be minimum 3 hex away. Diorite bridge should work(right?), as my embark has no iron but my 34 strong military now wears all bronze & steel so after the next ambush/siege I should have the reserves. In the case of a burning goblin dying over a bridge, I'll build all 3 bridges out of iron...

The opposite wall will possibly have a 4th bridge covering a crossbow bunker in the case she needs backup... I dont like using weapon or cage traps.  ;)

2055
DF Dwarf Mode Discussion / Weaponizing a dragon?
« on: June 11, 2011, 08:33:21 am »
After playing DF for over a year, the very first Dragon ever came to meet my Fortress. Of course, she was overcome by Dwarven Intelligence (a cage trap) quick, and is now the latest addition to my dining hall zoo.

However, knowing that Dragons are probably pretty powerful and breath fire, I'd like to weaponize her... What I have been thinking about so far:


A) building a separate air-lock type(raising bridges) entrance, where all walls and floor tiles are (rock) constructions so that the fire doesnt spread
B) getting her in a room with no way out, fortifications inside the entrance hall, to make her actually use the fire breath attack instead of meleéing the Goblins/Elves/Humies
C) a 3rd bridge to cover the fortifications to allow salvaging/dumping, safe passage, and to protect her from Goblin Elite bow/xbowmen.

Of course, she'll be moved in in the cage she now sits in, and released only once the entrance is ready and safety drawbridge raised.

Shouldnt the above plan work, am I missing something... Suggestions?

Pages: 1 ... 135 136 [137] 138 139 ... 174