Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - KaminaSquirtle

Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 47
391
General Discussion / Re: [:3] Things that made you HAPPY today thread.
« on: November 12, 2010, 04:36:07 pm »
(I started reading the text and then my socks exploded)
Do you feel that?
That's my envy.
WHY DO MY MATH TEXTS NOT MAKE MY SOCKS EXPLODE?
Bleh, must go further, more advanced.

392
Well, if he's gone I might as well unvote.
No reason to hit the replacement with a vote the second he steps in here.

*Sigh*  So many replacements...

393
Mafia / Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
« on: November 12, 2010, 12:13:36 am »
i vote for Usec

When you make yourself suspicious and then want to be voted for.... i will vote for you

as somewhere i red that people who make themselves suspicious in order to make confusion, you just vote for them.
(I red that somewhere in wizard duel 4)
This is golden.  You could make a joke book out of this guy.  He's like the Realmfighter of mafia.

394
Mafia / Re: Paranormal Mafia - Round 17 - Replacement Found
« on: November 12, 2010, 12:06:41 am »
Whoops, since someone said extension I assumed it was going to end soon.  What does everyone else think about an extension to Monday?  If you think it would be helpful...

For one, I have to agree with Jim from a while back.  Something feels off about you, Zathras.  You've made no accusations except on lurkers, and the The LurkerTracker® seems to have appeared as a convenient cover up.  It helps you target only lurkers while looking like you're putting a lot of effort into scumhunting.  In fact, every time I see a post of yours the point of it is: "Hmmmm, can't let those lurkers get away!"  "They're getting a free pass!  I can't let that happen!  Don't worry town, I'll protect you from the lurkers."  Your entire voting method so far is to see who is the most lurkery, without accounting for anything else, really.
And then you add on the question asking about other's top scumpicks, which seems to me as if you're trying to do a combination of seeing what the general consensus is, so you can avoid stirring up controversy, and pretending to scumhunt.

The only posts he doesn't just lurker it up are the ones concerning webadict, and the one he mentions an extensions, and even in those he manages to tie lurkers into it somehow.

And I hate to bring it up, but after your initial 'blue candy' post, you never mention me again, even when I get a quite large amount of suspicion.  Actually, you haven't really done anything other than defend and attack lurkers, as I think Jim pointed out.  Your abundance of defenses and impressive displays, but lack of scumhunting, makes me suspicious, Zathras.

The other person who caught my eye was Ottofar.  This is his only non RVS post:
What, SHADOW.

First of all, Unvote Zathras.

And a policy lynch doesn't make the day any shorter.
Not timewise, but it makes us short town.  Scum should be lynched, not town, no matter how stupid.  That is the point of town.
Unvote.
Vote JanusTwoface.
Kamina. This one here. It's a post to look less scummy. Which in itself is scummy.

It's a shame, I was about to extend you some noob slack but then you go and do something violently reactionary like this.

Whyyy are you voting for JTF? You were just explaining away his actions a minute ago.
Because I was thinking in the context of BM.  What he's doing seems different now.  I understand it from a new perspective.  He's suggesting a lynch simply because of a player's rep, with no regards to losing a chance to lynch scum.  I can unvote whenever the hell I want.  I want answers out of the fucker.

I'm done being wishy-washy, as you pointed out I was.  Are you seriously suggesting I would be so stupid as to bus my scumbuddy this early just because of a small accusation?
Goddamn, I'm not that stupid.
WIFOM here.



Yeah, I've been lurking because there were certain technical difficulties. Having electricity go on and off pretty randomly, that is.

I like how the game is active.

My list'd go something like: Kamina
SHAD0W
Perhaps JTF.

Damn, I'll try to do a bit better post tomorrow.
He may have had an excuse for lurking then, but not now.  This has been his only real post so far, and he uses it to Org it up?  JTF pointed this out first:
I like how the game is active.

My list'd go something like: Kamina
SHAD0W
Perhaps JTF.
I don't like how you're not.

Your list is the exact same as Org's, which is the exact same as people have been saying for a while now.  Nothing new and no reasoning given. Scummy.
And I'm inclined to agree.  He's just parroting Org, and Leafsnail a bit too.  He's done no thinking at all thus far.  This post is enough to earn some blue text.  Ottofar.

But who to vote?
Zathras.  I want to see more than one post from Ottofar before I vote him.  Zathras, however, has plenty of posts which back up my accusations.
Kamina:  If you want to convince us you're not scum, do it by negation.  Show us someone else who is scum.  Right now, you're #2 scum in my book.

You're doing a poor job of scum hunting now.  You voted Leafsnail for lurking, then when he came back and posted, you changed your reason for voting him... to because he voted you for acting scummy?  Try harder than that.
This better, Toaster?

395
Mafia / Re: Paranormal Mafia - Round 17 - Replacement requested
« on: November 11, 2010, 10:24:52 pm »
Extension.
webadict needs a chance+I need time to actually not be stupid and help find scum.
Unvote.
I'm going to reread the thread and see what I come up with.

396
Mafia / Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
« on: November 11, 2010, 09:11:04 pm »
I'm reading that game too. Just give me a few hours from now to take care of some errands and read it fully.

Afair, Azure had claimed to be frustrated from screwed wall-o-text.
We don't have the luxury of having time to slack, so fight your frustration, Azure, fight it!
He posted that over 60 hours ago.  Surely you have something by now, Azure?  If your wall of text isn't done yet, please post what you have so far so we at least have something to talk about.

Wait, 60 hours?  Please prod Azure.  He needs to get back here.


Ninjad by mod.

397
Mafia / Re: Paranormal Mafia - Round 17 - Replacement requested
« on: November 11, 2010, 08:51:41 pm »
Well, there seems little chance of you changing your mind, so I see no need to continue this conversation.

What comes of this is up to the other players.

398
Mafia / Re: Paranormal Mafia - Round 17 - Replacement requested
« on: November 11, 2010, 08:20:26 pm »
You're still missing my point.  My point is you've posted almost nothing except attacks on me.  It's that you have nothing else to contribute that gets me.  It takes almost no effort to attack me.  Do something that requires effort.
You've admitted that you look like scum, and you can't deny that you look like scum.  In other words, you're expecting me to take on trust that you aren't scum.
I expect you to determine my scummyness from a combination of my past actions and my present ones.  I intend to show I'm not scum.  If you don't believe I can redeem myself, then by all means keep tunneling me.

399
Mafia / Re: Paranormal Mafia - Round 17 - Day 1
« on: November 11, 2010, 07:45:42 pm »
But I'm still suspicious of Leafsnail.  He pops in to say nothing but that I was acting awfully scummy, and nothing else?  My acting scummy has already been established.  Seems like he's being less-than-useful.  My vote doesn't come off until better contributions from him.
So... you're admitting you did scummy things that make you scum, and are making no attempts to deny them.  Nor are you refuting any of my points.

You're just saying I'm scum for pointing our your alignment.  Uh, right.  Whatever.

My argument about your ridiculously panicky and inconsistent reaction (in which you make a series of irrelevant and contradictory statements) is both original and valid.  You've realised your actions are indefensible, so instead you've just decided to attack anyone who votes you.  This is not a townie thing to do, and your flailing is looking more classically noobscum by the post.
No.  They don't make me scum.  They make me look like scum, sure.  How am I supposed to refute that something makes me look scummy when it does?

Your arguments aren't original.  I'm quite sure everyone has noticed those points by the time you posted them.

I'm not taking issue with you voting me.  I don't like it, but it doesn't make you scummy.  However, lurking and then only pointing out obvious points, and almost nothing else, does.  You're trying to dismiss my argument by saying that I'm just 'flailing'.  Maybe you should address my actual point instead of making a strawman by putting words in mouth.

400
Mafia / Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
« on: November 11, 2010, 07:17:28 pm »
Where did he defend himself enough to show he wanted to keep playing?  He didn't even defend himself IIRC.  Please point out where he did.

My point was if he didn't care I don't know why about half his posts were just excuses. \
You may have something there, but to me it just seemed like he felt obligated to explain why he wasn't posted.  He eventually realized he wasn't playing, and decided to give up his position to Native.

Speaking of Native, I'd like to hear more from him.  We could use as much material as we can get on him, as he joined so late.
Let me rephrase the question: please show some examples of scumhunting on your part.  I just want to see how you defend yourself.  That's different than going back and seeing what you did.  I'll remove my vote when you answer the question, unless your answer screams scum or something.

This is oh so easily something that would be answered better if you went back and looked into what I have done. Everything against Mindmaker was an attempt to scum-hunt. Day one I tried to have spade (/you) try to participate and got nowhere. I tried to get Jet to actually provide some freaking evidence and he did not. People just seemed to stop answering alot of my questions by day two and so I couldn’t get anywhere.

But seriously it would be better for both of us if you just looked back through what I have posted so far and made your own opinion because honestly I think you are just asking what Zatharas asked you in Paranormal and am not totally sure if you even know what answers you are looking for.

I’d seriously be happy to justify any of my actions to help assert that I am town but you are gona have to give me specific actions that need justification (find quote ask how I intended  it to benifit town ect ect). I mean I was almost positive Ottofar was scum and do not know how Jet wasn’t and pretty much everyone else made those same mistakes.

Still I am at least glad things seem to be moving again I just wish the others would get in here and start posting .

I guess you're right.  The point of the question was to get some content-filled posts rolling.  I think we can say it worked.  You also seem to me to be town at this point.
Unvote.
And yes, I did steal it from Zathras.  I figured it would be a good question to get things rolling again.

Now I want something more form Azure.  He's gone too long without posting content.
Azure, post some content and the vote goes away, as long as it isn't scummy.
Yes I want you to post that bad.
I've found a good game to observe, if anyone else wants to see Azure play scum.  BM XVI.
I haven't read it yet, but it should be very enlightening.

Reading now, and I think if we had looked at this earlier we would have realised Jet is just bad at mafia :(
Fixed that for you.  See sorcerer's apprentice mafia to see scum Jet.  He sucks just as bad at scum as town.
Honestly I'm glad he isn't here.  He would screw us over at LYLO.  Can you honestly say we wouldn't end up voting him?
Well in that game nobody could get a good read on Azure as scum either  ??? And while his playstyle was quite similar to this game it ended to early for me to get anything really.

Though I notice that he once again he wasn't the first to vote against Jet who was lynched on day one.
I'm about halfway through that game, and only USEC seemed to have him.
He seems hard to lynch, at the very least.
I want to see his next post.

401
Mafia / Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
« on: November 11, 2010, 05:30:35 pm »
I've found a good game to observe, if anyone else wants to see Azure play scum.  BM XVI.
I haven't read it yet, but it should be very enlightening.

402
Mafia / Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
« on: November 11, 2010, 05:22:53 pm »
So if Azure is indeed scum, then he is being very, very good at it - no slips and an extremely helpful outlook for the town.
I agree wholeheartedly with this the biggest problem of course being if anyone could play the whole game as mafia and get through it without any obvious slips it would probably be Azure. Although out of all his votes so far Azure hasn’t actually started a single one except against Ragnarok which was for lurking and not likely to turn up as a lynch, not that that is overly scummy.

And I looked through to see anything between him and Ragnarok but turned up nothing. They didn’t specifically look like they had distanced themselves on purpose and neither did they look to close. Ragnarok was definitely online a lot more often than he posted and seemed to be actively lurking which is a lot like I played when I was first scum but of course we are different people. What do you guys think Active lurking scum or just uninterested town?

Either way I would really like to see azure post his thoughts.
Agree with 1st paragraph.  He hasn't really started anything, just backed stuff up.  Please provide examples if you disagree, Azure.

Well, to me it looked like rag was bad town, I mean he did he play at all?  I'm just kind of mad he didn't get a replacement earlier.  He would have to be seriously dishonest to use all those real life excuses to hide a scumlurk.  That doesn't seem to mesh with what I've seen of his personality.  I think he was online but not reading this.  I think he's more of an upper forumer.  Could have been scum, but I don't think so.

I would also really like to hear Azure's thoughts.  He's been silent for far too long.

Either way I would really like to see azure post his thoughts.
sorry for not doing stuff, stuff happened. Nothing to say, really. Sad that we're not doing so well.
Although this post made on day two right after we screwed up on Ottofar and lost Kamina Mark I  makes me think Ragnarok was either the worst townie ever or actively lurking scum just desperately trying to post anything. Most of Ragnarok's other posts were just excuses as to why he wasn't playing...If he really was a uninterested townie who didn't care about our cause this makes me wonder why he seemed to still want to stay alive and in the game.
Where did he defend himself enough to show he wanted to keep playing?  He didn't even defend himself IIRC.  Please point out where he did.
Flintus, tell me why you're not scum, and why I should remove this vote.
Simple answer is of course because if I die we lose the game. So far this day nobody has been helpful and instead of just forcing posts by voting why don’t you go back through a couple of days and see what you can find Kamina. We have to actually work together to get evidence seeing as it’s day 3 and we really have barely any idea. 
Just because I voted you doesn't mean I don't want to work with you.  And that's a very weak argument.  I don't intend to lynch you, not yet anyways.
Let me rephrase the question: please show some examples of scumhunting on your part.  I just want to see how you defend yourself.  That's different than going back and seeing what you did.  I'll remove my vote when you answer the question, unless your answer screams scum or something.
I need to force posts because we keep stalling without them.  They can provide invaluable information too.
I intend to go back and look for evidence too.  But first I'm going to see how Azure normally plays by digging through some of his past games.

403
Mafia / Re: Paranormal Mafia - Round 17 - Replacement requested
« on: November 11, 2010, 03:11:58 pm »
Otto, would you care to copy Leafsnail any more?  Even his arguments weren't original.
It looks to me like you waltzed in here to avoid getting attacked for lurking, and decided to make a safe vote, and leave without actually doing anything.
Please contribute.
Just noticed you weren't lurking, it was a blizzard hitting your electricity.  Though, other than the lurking bit, my point still stands.

404
Mafia / Re: Paranormal Mafia - Round 17 - Replacement requested
« on: November 11, 2010, 03:09:06 pm »
Agree on extension.  We could use more time.

405
Mafia / Re: Beginner's Mafia XVII - Day Three: Death of a Salesman
« on: November 11, 2010, 02:57:57 pm »
I think we may need another extension, we're not getting anywhere.

We have a lot of speculation going on here, but we need some solid tells in order to make a decision that won't lose the game.
Agree.
There was a lot of speculation about Azure on my part, and Native did some too. None of it went further than just speculation, so if Azure is indeed scum, then he is being very, very good at it - no slips and an extremely helpful outlook for the town. Anyone know if he's really that much experienced? For now, unless a good objection is made, I'll consider him town.
Let me check the games he's played in.  I may have an idea.

And I think a reason this game is stalling is that Azure hasn't posted his thoughts recently.  It doesn't feel right without him chiming in with his opinions.  I can't help but feel he's having ideas and not telling us them.

Hell, we're not getting anywhere at this rate, there's WAY too little pressure here for it to be LYLO.  Time to heat things up.
Flintus, tell me why you're not scum, and why I should remove this vote.

Pages: 1 ... 25 26 [27] 28 29 ... 47