616
Mafia / Re: Flabort's High Powered Bring Your Own Role 2: Day 4: Expanded Roster
« on: February 22, 2016, 02:08:45 am »PFP (because posting 20 minutes from first uni class felt like a good idea :V)Hold on, didn't you try to daykill me yesterday? Hypocrisy much?
DA while I have TMS under my newbie cardzone, I can see some merit in his case (despite being somewhat mostly based on...your self-description of *being inefficient >_> TMS, expound on that* bit)TMS, I'm going to make this fairly simple for you. Back that up with something that isn't a petulant excuse or I will daykill you....Seriously.
While I get having a daykill is a nice bit of leverage you can thrust onto people, you're thrusting it...right in people's faces, without the open consideration people have onto OTHERS. While I also get that the orange bit is more of an intimidating force (which in my notes is a characteristic of your general play), there's a...lack of content in your posts thus far. This is somewhat correlational to my 'DA Scumhunting track' because it is narrowed down--not a bad thing (since you're in my green-zone of not being cult lleader//Mafia), but...
You have...like 6+ other targets. "Several" other targets. :v
Also, I remember the "I have a weapon pointing right at you do what I say" tactic occurring quite a bit before. Although here it's not quite the same.
Quote from: Tiruin
TolyK<3
You're sweet and I love you just as much as anyone else, and the smilies are a topping on me seeing you as my silly playerbuddy [OOC], but bleh.
Quote from: Tiruin
OK, so someone can suggest a (voluntary) role-swap with others.Sorry for purging your reading comprehensionIneffective scumhunting, drawing attention to yourself while diverting attention from your target.I'm pretty sure this is the definition of bad play, not of scum play.
(OR HE'S A JESTER!!!1! /jokes)
I feel really shitty (headache etc.) so I'll answer the standing questions directed to me and yeah.Tiruin: Those huge sentences with interjections sometimes burn my reading comprehension out.Anyway! Someone exchanged with me a role that I most likely believe they knew the name of (hint: It's specifically dealing with what happened yesterday--and given the shift of mention today,Did you give any more info about this?
[1]Quote from: TiruinI can easily rule out that Tawarochir is NOT the cult leader because I did something to him last night. :V Do you feel lucky like that? Well do you, punk?Not quite sure how what you did rules it out, tho.
[2]Quote from: TiruinI'm basically asking everyone's reads as of this moment. Also is massclaiming a good idea? I'm all for that too.I'm ok for claiming like 90% of my role. The 10% would be insurance.
I also would like to forward the idea of those who have flipped TOWN to claim everything they did earlier that they are comfy with [ie Basically claiming anything that helps narrow down the scum-spects] because this works as a double-edge for them if they have revived under another alignment[/b]Actions I have already claimed (2 chats).
[2]Quote from: Tiruin's ReadsTolyK -- >_> I don't know anymore. He's been a hectic bunch of tumbleweeds [mafia-relation not meant; figurative mention really meant.] because of his attitude the whole game. HOWEVER I don't think he's Mafia given his blatant outrightness in going 'everyone can win! I need notes on the MafiaElaborated harder, ma'am.' <_> Though I usually assume that Mafia = teamplay and his play is...not team-oriented. Especially with that presumed 'Nuke-in-a-box' he's holding; still doesn't strike somewhat town-y because HE HASN'T USED IT. A very noteful thing for later on.
I'll elaborate on this in a bit (as time allows - I still have lots to do as well as sleep before tomorrow -.-), but it seems to me like something doesn't add up. 4maskwolf for now.Elaborate harder, now.and thanks for having the TolyK patience of reading through it like a nice guy
But points!
[1] Not really...because I only received word of it today. Thing is, the role given to me was noted in my PMbox this day start. It had the option to return it to the one sending it to me as a free action, so...I did. And now have my initial role taken from me, back. As far as I know, it seems to be a role-switcher thing, in which the one who switched it (AND HASN"T CLAIMED YET) knows the role.
Now on the 'I most likely believe they knew the name of' bit, that role that was borrowed from me has a very specific name wording that I believe the player who submitted it and it was rolled randomly given, knows, given the instance of how I used it yesterday
Quote from: Tiruin
[2] ...I targeted Tawarochir last night; while that claim is non-evidence...ial, 4mask did note a change between cult #s. I'ma ssuming the cult leader's action is a night one (because that'd be hilarious if it was DAY), but yeah. While I can't offer any substantial proof that I'm not the cult leader (other than, y'know, telling you I'm not, since that's what anyone would say on bounds of an infraction UNLESS they back it up with cleverness-in-a-way :V), I'm curious how you see me as a possible target.
Y'know, other than connecting me to Tawarochir in a creative way. If that was one possible factor, I'd like to know that too!
4mask: Detail the #s given last N3
Quote from: Tiruin
[2] 2 chats?Chat with TDS and DA (N1). Chat with NQT (N2). Free-action as insurance (unclaimed as of yet). Nothing N3 or any day, because blocked.
Expound, good sir.
Okay, quick question TolyK: Why the actual fuck would I fake claim and an ability that is ridiculously easy to check and prove the falsehood of? All it would take is a single neutral-or-friendly-to-town third party that wasn't on my list and I would have been immediately caught out in my lie. I could buy me doing that late in the game, but early on with most of the players still alive in a decently large game? Nope. You either think I'm an idiot, didn't think through the implications of your accusation, or are really, really stretching to try and implicate me.First off, neither the mafia nor cult would counter-claim. Secondly, it's a fairly decent gamble. There were also talks of role/wincon obscuration, so you could've fallen back on that. No, I don't really think you're an idiot or implicating, just stating my suspicions. Defensive much?
Is this too many questions? 
