Even if we take what you claim as all that's needed as actually all that's needed, a claim which I doubt
What makes you say that?
Knowledge of ecology. But I've already explained my reasoning, why bother doing it again?
Now answer my actual questions and don't, how'd you put it, "become confused and focused on irrelevant things." Why is forcing the players to make each individual species good for the game?
Are you confusing how the game works with how reality works again?
If not, what are you trying to say there? It looks like you're saying I'm lying or fickle or something.
Firstly: I'm
so sorry that your attempts to make the regions in the game somewhat ecologically sound made me think that you wanted to make your game follow basic ecological rules.
And it would be nice if you answered the following question, which I've asked several times now:
How does forcing players to make each and every species separately improve this game?And while I'm asking questions I wanted answered:
Why did you not give me a "nearest possible action" or else another turn to make a valid action in?
