((The problem is that (if I'm reading it correctly), we need to make all the little bits that form a functioning ecosystem.
I thought I was making it pretty clear that this was my problem, and Irony failing to correct my misunderstanding made me more certain of it.
I'm still not convinced that that's not how it is. That will wait for Irony to respond to my feels-painfully-obvious post.))
((And I got ninja'd.))
((I described the problem at one point as moving the goal-posts. This was incorrect.
The problem is that we aren't sure where the playing field is.))
((The problem is that you've assumed where the playing field is and refuse to listen to explanations to the contrary.
You could have asked "Hey, how many types of animals do we need?" or "Say, won't a lack of biodiversity be a problem?" or "Wait, what's necessary to have a tribe that won't starve again?"
Instead you went on a tirade about, amongst other things, how I need to handwave thousands of undefined but assumed species in, because otherwise I'm going to cause the ecosystem to crash because RL ecosystems don't always do so well without thousands of species.))
((The problem is that I thought there was problem X, tried to make this clear...and you never explained that the problem I was complaining about simply didn't exist.
See why I continued to hold my assumptions? You didn't actually disprove them, you tried to go on about how players could create all the species they needed to and didn't need to make that many without actually explaining that the reason for this is that the problem I was complaining about didn't exist.))
((More ninjas? Ninja. Whatever.))
((I described the problem at one point as moving the goal-posts. This was incorrect.
The problem is that we aren't sure where the playing field is.))
((@GWG: You could've asked first before going into what seems to be a holistic argument on the case at hand >.>
We, are quite sure where the playing field is.
But then the argument had to devolve into nitpicking which had appropriately no basis on the current matter.
PPE: Irony.))
((Didn't help that Irony never bothered to explain that I was wrong. You all tried, but you're not the GM so I didn't pay much attention to your interpretation of the rules.))