31171
Roll To Dodge / Re: Roll to Lab
« on: April 27, 2013, 11:07:26 pm »
Name: Timothy O'Brian
Gender: Male
Division: Biology (Zoology)
Gender: Male
Division: Biology (Zoology)
May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
((i find it amusing that none of us are targeting the large creature))((I am, just not specifically. And why would I be crazy enough to antagonize such a beast directly?))
This is set in the future, it stands to reason that a certain amount of methodology exists that does not exist in 2012.Okay, a chimpanzee trying to rewrite Shakespeare.
If I were going to biologically create carbon fibres then I would probably have proteins that bond to a carbon, bond carbon-first onto a long carbon chain, and then release the carbon and let someone else take a turn. This would probably require multiple proteins acting on concert in a favourable medium.I'm a little doubtful about this, especially due to lack of biological precedent. Life doesn't tend to work in units smaller than amino acids, certainly not as small and reactive as lone carbon atoms.
Bones do more than just provide structure, so you would be looking at the carbon-fibre being used as reinforcement rather than the primary substance.Well, duh.
Getting the fibres to bond to the bones in an efficient fashion would provide further difficulties. And the manufacturing process would likely require significant space and energy. Energy seems to be in short supply given the current fauna, although it seems reasonable to expect that there is abundant sunlight. Space on the other hand would be a problem, as you are likely going to want to produce the fibres inside the substance of the bone, as the inherent fragility of something with a micro-scale width and macro-scale length would preclude transport of the fibres, and then there is issue of getting the fibres effectively implanted into the bone if they are not manufactured there.Quite true problems.
I am all in favour of pursuing carbon-fibre bones, and carbon-fibre sinews and carbon-fibre, diamond-studded skin and whatever else, but I don't think it would be time-efficient for this project. Although we could look into buying it. What sort of biological features are for sale? Oh, right, we are sort of broke(As far as buying use of major design patents is concerned) until we get this job done...I dunno. While it would rock if we could do all that, I don't think we can.
Oh! Hey! I want wings! Gliding could be a great way to travel long-distances. Although the gravity could be an issue, it would depend on the weather, enough convection and it might be viable...Yeah, gravity's a big issue. That and size. Just use airplanes or automobiles.
Are you implying that it's impossible to modify or create enzymes that aren't denatured at (what was it? 350c?)? Because that appears to be what you're saying is completely unrealistic.I don't get where I would have said that.
Both. Explaining is good but links are best.Well, I'm not good enough at link-fu to link paper books, so I'll just explain.
I contend that incorporating carbon fiber into our bones is perfectly feasible with advanced genetic manipulation, and assuming that the rule of awesome is in effect I challenge you to explain why it isn't.Assuming it is, there's no point to this argument.
Who says? Maybe in this hyper advanced society they've already discover the Avatar carbon fiber gene. And again, I contend it's not impossible. Therefore it's possible. Therefore it might be worth a try in a forum game where we don't have to worry about actually writing the code ourselves.And maybe they've made unicorns that poop puppies.
We're going to have to bend realism at some point. Unless you want to code in the genetics yourself. Or as a more relatable example, do we want to go over the suite of avian respiratory adaptations or just say 'bird lungs'?That's not what I was saying.
For which part? I could also explain it to you.QuoteWhy? Shrinking has a ton of problems with it, from brain size to senses.Lies and slander! (links?)
Was explaining what I was going to say- I took the carbon fibers idea from Avatar, and the ribcage/circulatory from a series by hogan.Yes, because Avatar was such a pinnacle of scientific realism.
That's like asking the Wright brothers to design a space shuttle. Or maybe Newton. We need something to base it off of; we can't just poke a gene in there to make the body do entirely new things.QuoteShow me one example of organic carbon fibers.Hey! Just because it doesn't currently exist doesn't mean it couldn't! Don't be such a party pooper.