38686
Forum Games and Roleplaying / Re: Feudalism Rethought Redux: Step 1
« on: January 03, 2013, 07:45:44 pm »Can I join wait list? I love RMGs.Sure. What do the R and M in RMG stand for?
May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
Can I join wait list? I love RMGs.Sure. What do the R and M in RMG stand for?
Wait for it to come.+1
We shouldn't overlook(longevity of shadow objects permitting) adding another mask, or costume bits, with our powers.Wouldn't that be heavy? We don't have super-strength...
On the outside: big beefy shadow armor monster swinging around a sword.
Inside: A lady wearing a hoodie, balaclava, sweatpants... etc.
Though, since we apparently want to be a hero, the sword should probably be a mace or club.
Really all we need is face and fugue hiding so GWG but with the goalie mask(for remembering)Wait, why is the goalie mask better?
Agreed. Silence is golden.Not even an inch, it just exudes a sort of misty-haze around itself when you aren't concentrating.Okay. I can see how that might be a problem in prolonged fights if we've got a visor on.
Which is why I propose a blank party mask. It's creepy, and we can clasp it around our head with shadows, much more reliable than string, and we can armor the inside of it. Well, except for the eye parts. We might have to put black lenses in there.
Then we put on the armor, and bam. Instant creepy armor getup.
As for heroic name? Eh.. I think it'd be better if we remain silent behind the mask. Lets see what the papers come up with.
Again, go ahead but don't force me to join or anything like that.You too? Oh well maybe Celestia has a more open mind...Afraid I have to agree with mcclay here. Mind you, go ahead and make it, but...don't try to force it down our throats.Really, damn, well you're missing out.Foocubus are in the pipeline.I don't want anything you have in any kind of "pipeline".
...Which came out MUCH worse than intended...
I just read through 250 replies. You guys talk fast...No. I just got here after a few hours and Chrome has so many tabs from various threads that I can't even see all the Bay12 icons.
GWG, updated your crimewatch list recently?
Elves...Dwarves...Wyverns...now all we need is Goblins and Kobolds.They're not elves!
Two lived, and were cured by Draco; not carriers anymore.I really need to read the turn, don't I?
Afraid I have to agree with mcclay here. Mind you, go ahead and make it, but...don't try to force it down our throats.Really, damn, well you're missing out.Foocubus are in the pipeline.I don't want anything you have in any kind of "pipeline".
EAT SUCCULENT DEER-FLESH+1
Excellent. Turns are a decade apiece, right?Are my current Eladrin physically mature, or will they need to wait until they're 50 years old or so chronologically?Already mature.
Well, that didn't go as planned. Repeat in exactly the same manner, because we all know that the most popular definition of insanity is the polar opposite of correct.That went exactly as I intended. We're on top of a deer, aren't we?
Photons have NO mass. If you turn on a flashlight, do you feel recoil? Why not, the photons are moving at the speed of light?Well there would be recoil. If you're using enough energy to vaporize a tank, that is a ton of light and energy in one spot, and light has energy and momentum,which will cause noticeable recoil.I doubt that vaporization can ever be considered LESS damage than anything...and, again, once you get FTL you're probably harnessing the equivalent of modern-day cities to power children's toys.Really fast. Nah, but the advantages of laser is speed and accuracy, but where a laser vapourizes what it shoots at, the bullet just deforms, doing more damage for less energy.How do you fire a bullet at lightspeed, or so I have no idea what you mean?Anyways, lasers can cause grevious damage to a body with a single shot. In an antimaterial role, it could presumably melt the armor of a vehicle. Obviously, it's not too energy-efficient, but by the time you get FTL you're throwing lots of controlled energy around anyways.In most cases however, a bullet with the same force won't even leave a body/vehicle to shoot at.Force, not speed. A solid projectile can easily put out much more force without having to move at light speed.Lasers are a lot cheaper to get moving at lightspeed, and it's not the speed that breaks stuff with lasers. It's the heat.
Force is tricky when dealing with light. Light is pretty much massless, so there's no force either. Just heat and such.
I'm assuming increases in energy technology roughly equivalent to those in spaceflight. Any FTL is WAY more than we have now.Depens on the type of FTL. Alcubierre warp drives are very energy efficient once constructed. Handwavium drives are even better.I doubt that vaporization can ever be considered LESS damage than anything...and, again, once you get FTL you're probably harnessing the equivalent of modern-day cities to power children's toys.Really fast. Nah, but the advantages of laser is speed and accuracy, but where a laser vapourizes what it shoots at, the bullet just deforms, doing more damage for less energy.How do you fire a bullet at lightspeed, or so I have no idea what you mean?Anyways, lasers can cause grevious damage to a body with a single shot. In an antimaterial role, it could presumably melt the armor of a vehicle. Obviously, it's not too energy-efficient, but by the time you get FTL you're throwing lots of controlled energy around anyways.In most cases however, a bullet with the same force won't even leave a body/vehicle to shoot at.
It all depends on efficiency. Once you can muster enough energy, lasers are often the better choice. (Not always, overheating problems are annoying). Why would you need to completely vapourise a thing when scrapping it is enough. For the same amount of energy you'd need to kill one human by laser, you can probably shoot ten.I agree with this stuff, but lasers do have some advantages.
Also, bullets are harder to deflect. A field of particles or some really good mirrors completely negate a laser.I'd disagree. Lasers of sufficient power can burn through mirrored glass and the like, while bullets can be "deflected" by mundane armor.
Hm? How do you figure? Isn't acceleration due to gravity based on the sum of the squares of both masses?By that logic, light isn't affected by black holes.Actually, light has energy and momentum, but no mass. Momentum is a result of energy, not mass.Momentum equals speed times mass. Mass = 0 Momentum = 0
Err, guys. Can we stop arguing? This really doesn't matter and I don't want the whole operation shut down....This is sci-fi. Lasers are very relevant, hence this is a germane topic.