49276
DF Modding / Re: Another stupid idea: BoneTraps, MagmaTraps & ObsidianTraps
« on: September 03, 2012, 04:12:52 pm »
This is news to you?
May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
Me, kind of!I didn't, I agreed with it.
Oh wait
Then why'd you suggest a French island anyway? srsly gaiz
Can someone explain to me what this is? Please? I read through something like 20 pages and still don't quite get it.I'll give it a shot. We are planning to colonise Mars somewhere, probably incorporating a Lunar colony to help finance our Martian one. Then, once we are well-established and -armed, we will take over Terra using Luna as a staging point. I'll be making the genetic monstrosities of all flavors needed to make this happen. Right now, we are figuring out how to finance our Lunar resort/secret military base. A popular option is to free some third-world country from dictators and run it fairly, increasing our resources AND our PR simultaneously. Any questions?
Also, shoulding the title read "You own an intra-galactic mercenary company!"? We only go in one galaxy, AFAIK...
Maybe Inter-stellar would work better?
It would've been nice if we could've caught the hatch so we could stick it back on behind us.
Either one could work. Building our own lets us build concealed weapon places and possibly a space to stash picks and bags of plump helmet spawn, but buying them means we have higher quality goods.That could be close enough, if we had some boats or something.So...who lives near or in an unstable country? And don't say, "Me! The US is kinda shaky right now!", you're not being funny.Well, how would we get there? Aren't most Bay12ers in the States?How about a small part of the DR Congo? Somewhere in the interior, with access to a major river for easy transport.And of course, we would probably need a smaller country. Rowanda? Uganda? Congo (not democratic republic)?Somalia was recently invaded by the african union, so no.Hoooray, slightly more realism!Wait, someone agrees with me?Perfect!I always thought we could first conquer a backwards african country, then start selling drugs and stuff while exploiting the locals.
Pros: Realistic, only needs weapons and plane tickets.
Cons: Those natives have guns too. And the UN will be angry with us, but even Assad doesn't care about that.We could get some agents in the UN, have them booze up all of the other UN so they never judge us.Better idea: Conquer some country ruled by horrible dictators that the US hates, then run it well. We'll get plenty of wealth and positive PR.
It's a good idea. Gives us more time to truly decide what we're gonna do to Earth, as they'll like us.
So what country do we pick? I'd say someplace in the Congo - massacres there don't even get into the western news, much less on the front page.
What about Somalia? It is total anarchy there, and if we establish an agreeable government that curbs the pirates in the area, we would be on good standing with the west.
Does anyone even speak the language they speak there, or know what it is without looking it up?
Valid point, but there are many overseas, but none near that area. We need to find the greatest concentration before we make these plans.
Could liberate the island of Guadalupe north of Venezuela from the French.
We could build some using fiberglass and wood. Some of the boats at D-day were wood!
Or we could just buy some.
Conquer Quebec so they get to be their own country at last!And ruin our PR? Meh. Plus, how many of us speak French?
That's how the game works. In fact, that's how it's always worked...Ever since soil started growing plants, at least.
That could be close enough, if we had some boats or something.So...who lives near or in an unstable country? And don't say, "Me! The US is kinda shaky right now!", you're not being funny.Well, how would we get there? Aren't most Bay12ers in the States?How about a small part of the DR Congo? Somewhere in the interior, with access to a major river for easy transport.And of course, we would probably need a smaller country. Rowanda? Uganda? Congo (not democratic republic)?Somalia was recently invaded by the african union, so no.Hoooray, slightly more realism!Wait, someone agrees with me?Perfect!I always thought we could first conquer a backwards african country, then start selling drugs and stuff while exploiting the locals.
Pros: Realistic, only needs weapons and plane tickets.
Cons: Those natives have guns too. And the UN will be angry with us, but even Assad doesn't care about that.We could get some agents in the UN, have them booze up all of the other UN so they never judge us.Better idea: Conquer some country ruled by horrible dictators that the US hates, then run it well. We'll get plenty of wealth and positive PR.
It's a good idea. Gives us more time to truly decide what we're gonna do to Earth, as they'll like us.
So what country do we pick? I'd say someplace in the Congo - massacres there don't even get into the western news, much less on the front page.
What about Somalia? It is total anarchy there, and if we establish an agreeable government that curbs the pirates in the area, we would be on good standing with the west.
Does anyone even speak the language they speak there, or know what it is without looking it up?
Valid point, but there are many overseas, but none near that area. We need to find the greatest concentration before we make these plans.
Could liberate the island of Guadalupe north of Venezuela from the French.
I'm going to go with we should be Opening that hatch!
Reg up front along with Gordon check sides, Me behind being rearguard with Lillith in the middleThis should work.
i would win for the first posts