A few problems with the design:
1. Shoot it in the head with a BFG and it becomes a mindless potato.
2. If it's knocked over, how is it going to get up?
3. Power. What's it powered by? Magfields can only get you so far before your batteries are drained.
4. It has too much firepower for its suggested usage (think russian tanks with like 20 guns). You'd need to cart along extra ammo, reducing speed and stuff we can move. Considering we spend most of our time either running or stealing, I'd remove some of the weapons and replace them with storage canisters, for carting samples on research missions and stolen goodies on assault missions.
5. Is the production cost worth it? Why not get a bunch of Sods to haul our crap instead or bring a pneumatic exo?
6. How easily replaceable are blown off legs?
Otherwise, nice. As long as the bastards don't act like anything remotely involving MLP.
1. ...No, it won't. The head has one of the auxiliary CPUs that helps with firing. The remaining weapons on the head would be made less accurate, but that's about it.
2. Same way a horse does.
3. Read the description again.
4. Damn near all of its weapons are energy weapons.
5. Because horses are more efficient at carrying stuff. And sods don't have medifoam, multi-targeting, or other such perks.
6. About as easy as they would be for robodies.
although i still say he shoulda made a tricerabot.
WHY DIDN'T WE THINK OF THIS EARLIER
Because it's silly. And not suited for a support unit--legs too short, body too bulky.
Maybe a tank-like Ar-Prime?