HOOOooo... Almost regretting supporting the OOC thread.
What, you'd rather have this crap in the main threads?
@GWG - Quadrotors
I am familiar with square/cube law, yes. Are you familiar with attack helicopters? They can have a decent amount of armor, while still having enough firepower to take out tanks. A support quadrotor around the size of an Artee would be more effective than the heli by weight, because it's smaller- S/Q Law works in it's favor here.
...but less effective than every quadcoptor built in the real world. Because all of those are smaller.
Furthermore, it needs way less armor than an RT to have a similar survivability. Its profile is flatter, so it's harder to target, and as I stated before a quadrotor can lose a rotor and still be fairly effective. Not to mention that it can fly around in very erratic patterns.
How would the "flat" profile present a smaller target while still packing all the stuff the current R3 does?
Wouldn't those erratic patterns also make them harder at hitting things?
And wouldn't it be flying above the enemy, presenting a much larger target?
@GWG - XCOM
No, XCOM starts hard, then gets waay easier. I recently got it because of all the people in ER talking about it.
It's a cakewalk after you have three max level soldiers.
I started playing for the same reason and determined that the first missions are kinda tough, but then you start losing your best soldiers and then it all goes downhill.
...Aaand that ended up entirely addressing GWG. Huh.
Huh.
1. Quadcoptors? Link, please.
Dude, just google it yourself. Don't you know how to internet?
I assumed it was some kind of technical term, or maybe a sci-fi concept, not a real kind of miniature flying thingy.
But unless we can somehow process Grateclones into RU it ain't happening.
...Aren't both the human body and the sheets the AM makes everything from made largely from carbon?