707
« on: April 04, 2012, 11:10:41 pm »
I initially played DF with the Ironhand graphics set for my very first fort, but then used ASCII when next fort was a non-serious 6 hour fort to explore in Adventure mode while waiting for the graphics for a new version.
I actually found I could interpret the ASCII really well and got used to it fast. I ended up preferring ASCII more in the end and still use it.
I agree that there is a problem when it comes to creatures. This goes double with the animal-men looking exactly like their normal counter parts. That said it doesn't really bother me, yet.
I would also like to set graphics get an overhaul to allow modders to change tile designations for things that can't currently be changed. If that ever happened I'd probably play DF in tilesets so I could show my friends DF. Granted, the looks on their faces as they attempt to comprehend the ASCII is always funny, if a bit sad. Plus I also like to see Let's Plays and Succession forts use tilesets because it is easier to figure out what is going on at a glance that way. Sometimes overseers just don't describe what is going on in the picture you should be aware of.
So I like both, ASCII and Tilesets. I sometimes wonder why there are big fights over this though. As the tileset supporters point out, they just need a little more support functionality and it isn't like better tileset support will kill the ASCII mode.