...Dude, chill. You notice how I linked directly to my sources that proved my point in my post? That's how you're supposed to do it. You don't say, "just look for it, it's there". That's now how citing your sources works in
any setting.
Second off, if you notice from my previous post, running burns two to four times as many calories as lifting. When you're burning that much from an exercise, lifting weights to burn calories with your muscle isn't even a factor - And like I said, both lifting weights
and running together burns the most calories.
That site only references itself, and it's the only site you seem to accept as fact. I referenced several sources that themselves reference several sources, and wrote ten times as much as you have proving my point. That's hardly lazy.
Also, just a simple Google search turned up
several articles with
citations that
question what your site says. Turns out there's no reliable source for muscle burning so many calories a day, and it trends towards only being about two to three times what fat burns, landing at about 4 - 13 calories a day per pound, depending on the source. That's a far cry from what you're claiming.
That doesn't mean that weight lifting isn't important. I've mentioned I don't know how many times that the key to being in good shape is a well rounded exercise routine and a healthy diet. But muscle isn't the fat burning machine you're claiming it is.