10811
« on: September 10, 2016, 04:50:52 pm »
A joyfully formatted post to reply to. Thanks. Now I have to look in two places to see what you're responding to so I can respond to you properly.
1. Suppose you do. Do you actually? Unlikely. Why would one player be told that the roles are the same as the previous round? That's not OP at all, is it?
2. If the town roles are paralleled, why wouldn't the scum role be? You claim not to have made any actions so far, and nobody is dead. Scum in last game could kill... lightbulb!
3. That's a non-answer. I obviously thought you were in the same circumstances you thought you weren't.
4. I'm sure you do. See 2.
5/6. As scum, would you target a town role you know is inaccurate/unreliable/essentially a VT or someone with a more useful role?
7. Hohoho see 3.
8. Yet you ignore the fact I had something more important to bring to town's attention. Your scumminess didn't change, my attention was brought to something else. Which you ignored, every time I brought it up. I wonder why.
9. You just said you were voting me for not continuing my case on D1 for [8]. Which is it?
10. Why did I ask you questions in an effort to figure out what you were doing then? Initially it was pressure, it ended up as being a lynch vote. As all my votes tend to be.
11. What else should I have been voting for D1 then?
12. I can say with 100% certainty any player during a game is never, ever going to say a reason for voting them is a good reason, unless they're a Jester, give up or are gambiting.
13. Exactly. You're only voting me because I'm voting you. Great play.
14. Convenient.
15. And again, ignoring what I brought up at the day start.
16. Which is why your sole focus this day has been me.
This all boils down to you voting me because I'm voting you. And then not voting you because I was distracted by something more important. You seem to be confused as to what I should be doing.