11527
« on: July 25, 2016, 08:56:30 pm »
I'm aware of the benefits of a D1 lynch vs. a D1 no lynch.
The question I ask is why TBF? A question you ignored for the rhetorical examples I presented. As I say, TBF is indulging in "new town" behaviour - my vote is yet to be locked in him, I remind y'all - and I feel you are experienced enough (in general and specifically with TBF) to know that. TBF has been active enough for us to a) have a general read on him and b) compare his later play against. What about lynching Teneb, meaning we don't have to replace him on D1/2? BHK for his reliance on the night game? Juicebox (or Dustan) for being new?
My first vote was a pressure vote, that we have gone over (so god damn much) it was not a genuine "this is the person I want lynched" vote. It is heading that way now though, what with the tunneling and such.
I feel my play so far warrants a scum NK targeting. Take that for WIFOM, ya bastards.
PPE: for fu- how many times do you want me to say that I was voting you for pressure? That's how we get content in D1 when there was no N0. I like to move my vote around. It doesn't count 'til the day ends, so what's the point in leaving it in one place for the whole bloody day? You know I do this. Why is this time any different?
PPE2: yes you can Dustan. It is generally viewed negatively round these parts as there's no reason for it, at least not in D1. Heck, rarely on any day.
