Bay 12 Games Forum

Balls to you

Shouldn't have convinced myself I was wrong about EP earlier

Well done though guys. Had some early pressure on you, and you got through it.

Edit: scumchat reply 184, quite right, quite right

Edit 2: sad that I couldn't really do anything to convince others that doomchild was being way too sure about themselves about Silthuri's scumminess. Then again, pisskop thought I was a scummy bastard, and Silthuri was absent and had a guilty result on EP so... bummer.

"It's one thing to risk one's life for a cause, and wholly another to commit suicide in vain. I'm not going to martyrize Axt for what he did, and also won't act like there'd been any honour or dignity in going against all reason like that."

"Considering you offered the option to have you not attack Munroe with a mere two gods oppose the action, I would have to agree. It was a stupid thing to do.

Then again, three gods dying because Munroe attacked some pinko mortal journalists does seem rather stupid in itself."

Quote from: hector13 on May 10, 2016, 10:00:01 am

If what you're saying is correct, then TBF is the scum. Notable for his absence this day, perhaps.

Perhaps you'd like to respond to this then, TBF?

First off, I have real life too.

Second off, I've been more active this round than usual, hector, so why are you fingering me now?  Am I being too aggressive for you?

Then again, Starver has a bit of a fatal flaw here in that Fallacy's flip doesn't seem to support his argument.

I'm waiting on Moonlit to clear this up one way or another.

Sounds like an excuse to lay low, brah. You've not been aggressive at all, so if anything you're not being aggressive enough.

How does Fallacy's flip not support Starver's argument?

Did anything happen to you last night?

"I should make suicide boothes and shove you in em."

"I think at that point they cease to be suicide booths..."

You're demanding something you know isn't mine to give.  It is proved to me, that Fallacy wasn't making up the claim that someone other than Moonlit pestered him.

Without overly quoting the mod message sent,  I have the message inviting to join an enlightened society, as Fallacy said.  I nod and smile and thank them as I politely show them out, and am unchanged, as per my role. Only a fellow recipient would know this, and accept what I say.  Fallacy is dead by your hand, after refusing. You are trying to kill me, indicating I'm unchanged as far as you're concerned. My trap set, you are caught.

Unless you can wriggle out of it before Moonlit passes judgement. There's no more to say until additional information arrives.

Wait, there is one more thing, IIRC, but I need to post this first.

Should perhaps respond properly to this, though.

Firstly, I asked, and you ignored the question several times. How hard is it to say "I can't answer that bro"?

What trap did you set? It's quite presumptuous of you to say I'm the one that sent the message to recruit you because I came out and voted you straight off the bat.  Had I visited you and you accepted to hear what I had to say, my assumption would be that you accepted, and I would attack someone else. FoU said he refused to accept visitors, though somehow knows about the invitation from the "enlightened society". Given his wincon as the neutral role, he had to make something up to make him appear less malign than he was.  Perhaps you're just picking up his failed gambit to use as your own?

Got into a fight with a zombie holding a knife. He got the first hit in, so I slashed his knife-arm with my cleaver, removing it in a slow-mo effect. Then I chopped off his other arm, again with slow-mo. Then I removed his head, again with the slow-motion effect.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Dead Island.

I think it's fair to say that this zombie was quite 'armless.

Propose trait: Limited Affinity [Magic Type/School][x1.1]: The ability of a creature or race to harness one particular school or type of magic. Cannot perform magic from any other school or type unless they have this trait with that school/type as the parameter. This trait is incompatible with Affinity. Scales 2* per rank.

Oppose

"We already have a trait for this, if you want limited affinity, don't scale that one."

Propose that the effects nodes have can be decided by the gods who made them (must relate to their sphere or spheres).

Support

Propose that once per Tick, the god who made a node can change its effect to do something else (must relate to their sphere or spheres). The god can make this change at any time within the Tick.

Oppose

"This should not be so frequent, nor should it be a free action. It should also scale to the size of the node."

Propose that the maximum strength of the effect of a node is limited and enhanced by its size. The large a node is, the more powerful the god who made it can make its effect.

Support on the condition the effect cannot be changed once set.

Propose that nodes can be increased in size by the gods who made them with the difference in sizes being the cost. Nodes can be decreased in size for free and can be increased to a previous size for half the cost.

Oppose

"If you reduce the size, you will pay the full cost to return it to it's initial size. No shortcuts."

Propose that nodes can be moved by the gods who made them. The nodes can also be set to move by themselves.

Oppose

"Monroe's corpse is my property. No one is allowed to take it or do anything with/to it except me."

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Quote from: Andres on May 09, 2016, 05:53:52 pm

"Hello, Munroe. Your destruction appears imminent. I want permission to do experiments on your body after you are killed. To do this I will need your body, which I ask permission to use and own after you die. These are the experiments I want to do. I will only do the ones that you give permission to do and you may give permission to as many or as little as you like:

1. Look at your corpse and compare its form to the other gods. This is to examine any noteworthy differences between living and dead gods besides the usual.

2. Consume your corpse for Essence. This is to see if one can gain Essence from eating the corpse of a god. This experiment is incompatible with the third experiment.

3. Incorporate your corpse into the sun - along with 5 Essence of my own - to turn it into an eternally exploding artifact that nourishes all souls that bathe in its light. (Heals souls and gives gods who are in range +1 Essence per Tick.) This will permanently kill you, assuming you are not already permanently killed. This experiment is to see if god corpses can be used in this way and to see if a living god's Essence can be combined with it to create effects. This experiment is incompatible with the second experiment."

Quote from: Stirk on May 09, 2016, 06:07:24 pm

"G0...t0....h311..."

Quote from: Andres on May 09, 2016, 06:35:14 pm

"I forgot to mention this but the second experiment would also permanently kill you."

Quote from: Stirk on May 10, 2016, 02:27:43 am

"F1n3...b1tch....t4k3...1t"

Quote from: Andres on May 10, 2016, 03:45:14 am

"Thank you. Will you continue to oppose my proposals?"

I take Monroe's corpse and lock it inside Malakathium.
I look at Monroe's corpse and compare it to the living gods. This is to examine any noteworthy differences between living and dead gods besides the usual.
I consume Monroe's corpse for Essence. This experiment is to see if it is possible to gain Essence by consuming god corpses.

Propose that the corpse of Axt is siphoned of Essence and distributed randomly to Council members.
Propose that the corpse of Xenia is siphoned of Essence and distributed randomly to Council members.
"Corpses left too long out in the open turn into omnicidal monsters. The best course of action is to siphon their Essence now. It will destroy their bodies - preventing them from turning into omnicidal monsters - and the Council gets the greatest amount of Essence possible."

Oppose

Create an impenetrable field around the corpse of Munroe, using 1E

"An easily falsified document of correspondence, Malakath. Conveniently the only one who can confirm its falseness is also dead. You will not be taking the body of a deity to perform your vile experiments on.

If the bodies do indeed turn into omnicidal monsters, then we should destroy the corpses. Or we can lock them in another plane and they can fight each other for our entertainment, and we can destroy the remaining one."