That is a most, most foolish assumption to make.
Not really.
Things we know:
1. The guy jumped the White House fence to escape security.
Ergo:
1. The guy was panicked+stupid enough to jump the White House fence to escape security.
When panic mode kicks in, rational planning goes out the window. It's a dumb (and hilarious) decision, yes, but it's not really something you can blame the guy for.
No, no. It's reasonable to assume the criminal was either (both?) panicked or stupid; it was the assumption that the dude posting on politico has never been more panicked than the mundane examples offered. All we know of them is they think criminals are stupid and post on politico. Not exactly the foundation for a well-formed and insightful opinion regarding their testicular fortitude.
That is a most, most foolish assumption to make.
If you're in DC, I would hope you'd figure out where the White House is. It's kinda famous. Then maybe not jump the fence under any circumstances. I'd expect it to be something of a shoot first, ask questions later deal.
You would think, but there were a few incidents while Obama was in office and I don't think any of them resulted in gunfire.
Off the top of my head, someone accidentally landed a drone in the white house lawn once. There were others but that's the incident I remember.
I'm sure someone deliberately landed on the White House lawn in a flyer that they built, but they did at least warn everyone when they'd do it.
Perhaps they just don't shoot the obviously stupid ones?