14236
Mafia / Re: Mafia Marathon (Semi-bastard) Round 8
« on: March 22, 2016, 04:00:48 pm »
Why is Starver not a target?
May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
Based on the most recent claim of Playback's use, targeting me and showing hector, I believe that it reveals a random player who voted the target.So... does your Playback tell you who someone voted for?It's supposed to be a limited search of images on the Ship systems, as related to the target. I had somewhat assumed it would give me something understandable (what they do when they don't think they're being watched? ...an actual night-time act by that person, or else proof that they did nothing?), but when I specified you as the target (such being my choice, for reasons I'm sure I already at least partially explained), all I got in return was that I saw myself. No context to it.
That's probably in line with the apparently underpowered nature of most of us, and something else that I need to solve the mystery of before I go much further, as I'm spilling more than I would like. I'm probably intended to meld it with either another person's experiences or another night's usage, but that'd be second-guessing.
Oh right, oops.
Never mind.
TBF, you kill Fallacy. I'll move my vote.

I'll tell you why.
I misread the ability and Tomasque sent me a PM to clarify. It's actually for the day I use it on, and I just used it about when I posted my votecount post. I didn't want to tell you because you'd think I was lying.
And I got a hidden auto that reveals my action
Anyway, I think we need to kill as many people today as possible. We have 4 votes that are gonna work, so Fallacy, vote TBF. I suspect you already are, anyway.
I'll vote you. And that leaves enough votes to kill Hector. We'll take out 3 out of 4 suspects, making this our best chance to win.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
okay so my crush broke up with their girlfriend last friday and not too long ago tonight we both revealed that we had feelings for each other so !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm pretty happy right now lol, this is very nice :v
Being alive is always better than being dead.
All right, that makes sense. First game we are all HRE vassals and no touching De jure territory, and then second game we try to kill each other as hard as possible?
That's what I'm aiming for. No clue if everyone will accept it though.
This kind of defeats the whole point of the game, doesn't it? I mean, from this it follows that "Ireland isn't allowed to try to unify great Britain because I rule England already," and "I'm starting as a king, so nobody is allowed to start as a count" (personally I've had more fun starting as a count in Ireland, than as a king or emperor anywhere else)
Well, my original idea was for everyone to be part of the same Kingdom/Empire and have some stability in your holdings to prevent you from being entirely dicked over. So instead of having everyone spread across the map, we'd all be together and have to vaguely cooperate to achieve some kind of goal. Like taking over the Abbasid Empire as Zunists or conquering the Roman Empire as Norse Vikings. In other words something to ease us into playing multiplayer while keeping everyone close together for maximum interaction. Yeah, you lose out on some of the freedom of choice, but managing inter-vassal relationships is suddenly way more important than in single player. You'd also never get into the problem of being unable to form X title because everyone is underneath the same liege (who could form the title and hand it out as they pleased if it wasn't an Empire).
The second game we attempt can go fully dickery though. I certainly wouldn't object to that.
All right, that makes sense. First game we are all HRE vassals and no touching De jure territory, and then second game we try to kill each other as hard as possible?