Bay 12 Games Forum

Quote from: Covenant on March 10, 2016, 01:21:07 pm

I never thought Undertale was trying to be Earthbound. There's influences, sure, but it's mainly it's own thing.

Toby Fox never said so AFAIK, but almost every review and let's-play seemed to mention Earthbound in the first few minutes.

Quote

Anyway, my own answer to the OP would be Five Night's at Freddy's. I genuinely thought it was scary and a fun, original idea. Much like the Blair Witch Project, it seemed like one of those things that was initially popular, but then everybody was too cool for it. I wasn't a fan of how it (d)evolved into DEEPEST LORE for the sequels, though.

Right? Everybody seemed to really love it and then really hate it overnight. For the story's sake I feel like it should have stopped at 2.

3 was quite weak, but 4 was interesting.

Not that I ever played them myself. Watching Markiplier play them is enough.

Duno if it's necessarily hated, but I recall the Gamespot review gave it something like a 4 out of 10.

Gangsters: Organized Crime, somewhat broken game now, for whatever reason, and I can't play it without getting a virtual machine and stealing re-installing an older copy of Windows, but god damn that game is fun. No other crime sandbox game like it

Also, re:ME3ISBEST: no ME2 is best, mostly because it fixes the problems from ME1. Mostly. ME3 just rehashes part of the ME1 story, and unsubtly tugs on the emotional bonds you made of almost every other character that was in a previous game. None of the games are particularly fantastic, though...

But that's just, like, my opinion, man.

Plane walking

Me and my team of utterly useless scrubs went 6-0 down with 2:28 left.

Managed to tie the game with 1 second left, after I completely whiffed on a shot to tie, and one of my teammates tapped it in at the back post.

Lost 7-6 but ah well...

vote count reqeust

Quote from: NullForceOmega on March 09, 2016, 11:09:19 am

That has nothing at all to do with the point Neo.  You don't send you breeding population to die in a conflict, that's called "Shooting yourself in the foot.", and is generally considered really stupid.

You know that... Men are part of the breeding population too right?

The part men play in it is significantly shorter than the part the ladies play, though.

Also drafting women might get a bit dicey; there will be instances of "draft dodging" that a woman gets a letter (or whatever happens) and then immediately goes out to try to get pregnant to avoid it.

Quote from: Sonlirain on March 09, 2016, 09:30:45 am

Quote from: BlackHeartKabal on March 09, 2016, 09:04:00 am

Quote from: Sonlirain on March 09, 2016, 08:52:07 am

Crazy male supremacist comment on youtube.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Quote

Women can't and never will be equal to men. It would be like trying to be equal to an elephant, we are two different animals. Women will always have 10 times more white matter in their brain and men will have 7 times more grey matter. This leads to wide disparities in cognitive patterns. Also, there a many sexual dimorphism between men and women, that preclude any possibility of true equality. Women don't deserve the vote, as the State is force, which is undeniable, they should have no say in what the State uses the gun to do as they never pick up the gun to get it done. Women shouldn't vote, if y'all can't be drafted or conscripted into the Armed Forces, and y'all's neural and upper body physiology precludes the possibility of y'all being draftable. If women attempted to use force against men themselves, and not conscript beta male white knight armies, that are quickly dwindling, they would fail abjectly against serious male competitors or enemies. Nature is a bitch, and suffers no weakness to last long in her dominion, she does not love humanity anymore than insects, and when it comes to reality , women need men to live, and men need women to reproduce, c'est la verite.

It's kinda funny that him and his worldviews give people like Sarkeesian a leg to stand on.

Awful as that guy is, I don't believe that he gives me any more faith in the ideology that "We decide what's racist and sexist and we have to point it out to you".

True but he's proof that feminists have other things to fight for than their own delusions and a nonexistent evil patriarchy that keeps them down.
Things like this guy spewing rabid androcentrism and his kin who would like to see women reduced to a free fuck and house service with rights equal to what they get in Saudi Arabia.

So let's lock them all in a room with a big pile of weapons and no medical supplies, then when the bloodshed is over we just send any survivors to the electric chair. The world would get on much better if both groups were terminated abruptly and with extreme prejudice.

Little bit extreme is it not?

"You guys disagree, so we're gonna lock you in a room 'til you kill each other. Survivors will be executed."

Are both sets of ideas so reprehensible that we need to eliminate anyone who holds them in high regard?

ToasterToasterToaster!  This is the best thing ever!

...

isn't that, like, your job?