But seriously, FoU, what's your role name?
Well, if we can discuss role-names (I must admit that I had my doubts from the original way it was put), then I don't need to try to forget what has already been revealed. I mean, call me the rational one, but I think TBF doesn't know what I think I know about the veracity of FoU's claim - or anything similar that I might myself say. It sounds like only one person wouldn't be able to work that one out, but I'm willing to be corrected.
I don't suppose Hector can say anything about this, just to be sure?
Not really, FoU blocked me, so I wasn't able to do anything. Equally so, if it's a traditional jailor role, I was also protected from being acted upon, so... perhaps this throws Starver's claim they didn't act into question. The fact he's saying it's protective rather than a blocking role, though, is interesting. Makes him seem more benign, perhaps?
We can discuss role names and role abilities (presumably) which is somewhat more important than flavour, though given Tomasque's reluctance for us to discuss it (and the fact this is a bastard game) I think we could read into our own flavour beyond face value.
What is it you think you know about FoU's role, anyway?