Bay 12 Games Forum

The unfortunate thing is that the statistics don't have much to do with the game. It's all well and good saying "if we have a jailor we should do this" but we might not have a jailor at all. There's a statistical chance that the scum would benefit from pointing out the best course of action for the existence of a jailor when there's a chance the jailor isn't present, 'cause it ceases to be the best course of action.

It's a fallacious argument. Just because some is statistically likely doesn't mean it's going to happen.

Er... that's not what I said. And now OSG is the lynch target.

Looks like you're not paying attention to the game Fillipk. Why did you initially vote DA?

Why are you voting OSG now?

Two different questions, so I want two different answers.

Jailor shouldn't claim. Presently I'm the prime NK target because I can out scum, either directly or through process of elimination. Jailor can stop the kill in two ways, which is much more of a problem for scum. Don't do it just yet, if you exist.

I thought Dr. Carson's Healthcare Idea made more sense than any other ideas i've heard about so far.

What is his healthcare plan? /toolazytolook

Why? And how is it that s'posed to convince us you don't have it?

My wincon is to take out the Evil role. Which is why I'm voting you.

You're relying on the mod for defense now? Bit of a cop out is it not?

If I had my role stolen, you wouldn't need to hint at it since I'd already know my role was stolen, so why you think you'd need to hint at it is beyond me... poor gambit, bro.

The assertion that cis people are physically incapable of understanding trans people...Eeeeeeh.

Also, a decent portion of those statements are unequivocally supportive as written, then mutilated.

E:Wait, cis people might miss nuance?   Oh, yep.  Makes sense.

I didn't say physically incapable. Some perhaps are, but it was more of a psychological thing I was referring to.

For example, there are trans people who go full bore for the post-op stuff and some that are happy to identify as the opposite gender of their sex without surgery, while they're both referred to as trans. I don't understand this (meaning I exist in a position of ignorance through lack of knowledge, and don't have an informed opinion, so I pretty much don't have one beyond "huh?")

Even the concept of being trans is difficult for me, personally, again through the lack of knowledge/being ignorant/no informed opinion. While I like to think I'm quite an empathic person, I'm also pragmatic; aesthetics have never really bothered me, so... it's hard for me to put myself in the position of someone to which aesthetics appears to be* quite important. Also being comfortably cis probably makes it difficult. It's apparently quite difficult to explain succinctly, sorry.

The fact that it's also lumped into the sexuality argument (LGBT) is... weird too. Being trans isn't a sexual preference... is it?

*an observation, rather than THIS IS HOW IT FUCKING IS GUYS