2296
Mafia / Re: Webadict's Supernatural - Day 1: The Burning Sun [13 / 13]
« on: September 22, 2022, 11:25:36 pm »
Is this the paranoia we’ve been waiting for? :p
May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
Is Lenglon poking Mad about voting NQT while she is also voting NQT? Oooookaaaay…It's because I think Max is 3p, and I believe they're simply hopping on the most likely to cause not-Max to be the lynch bandwagon. I don't actually want Max lynched today, but I don't think Max is town. So when I see Max doing non-town things I am attempting to highlight it for people to see.
Max voting NQT is not making me feel good about Max, tying up the votes if I’m correct on that front. He mentioned wanting to eliminate them earlier in this post, based on the fact he doesn’t know much about NQT (as well as 4mask and Persus) but… that feels like a very crappy reason to eliminate someone, particularly combined with him suggesting the best one to get rid of would be the one that’s interacted with the most players, which… maybe that would make an informative elimination, but it’s based on something I think is more likely to be a town thing, so I don’t like it.
PPE: couple of posts to read while I was looking for Max’s post
I don't mind Max voting NQT, just don't like Max's reasons for doing it.
Is Lenglon poking Mad about voting NQT while she is also voting NQT? Oooookaaaay…I don't think that interacting with people is more likely to be a town thing in the case of strong players. It's easy to interact with people to look town. We just did it ourselves two games ago. But what I really mean isn't "interacted with the most players" exactly, but "has mutual entanglement with the most players so that the flip tells you something about them". Which I think is certainly true of NQT.
Max voting NQT is not making me feel good about Max, tying up the votes if I’m correct on that front. He mentioned wanting to eliminate them earlier in this post, based on the fact he doesn’t know much about NQT (as well as 4mask and Persus) but… that feels like a very crappy reason to eliminate someone, particularly combined with him suggesting the best one to get rid of would be the one that’s interacted with the most players, which… maybe that would make an informative elimination, but it’s based on something I think is more likely to be a town thing, so I don’t like it.
PPE: couple of posts to read while I was looking for Max’s post
I also, to be clear, think there's a good chance NQT may actually be scum. I am even starting to think that NQT could be part of a witch coven that are trying to bat for each other subtly, and since I already think that there is a member of a witch coven who is secretly evil...
I have a very difficult time understanding that you want to see Lenglon eliminated but are not willing to take any action yourself to make that happen. Hoping for a night kill might as well be complete inaction since there's no guarantee that there's a town aligned night kill or that the player who possesses it will use it on Lenglon. This is a passive approach and passive approaches are ill suited to most playstyles.
@Hector: How did you conclude Lenglon was Third Party? I mean, I certainly have my theory, but how would you explain/paraphrase it?
And fine, since it seems there's no point in holding this back at this point, I am Neutral. My wincon is identical to the Good wincon, but Evil can win ( and I lose) while I'm still alive. I initially thought I wouldn't be the only Neutral like this, and that I needed to meatshield for our Good players, treating them as VIPs.
I want to vote Hector for fundamentally disagreeing with what they're saying, but I don't know if that makes them scum. They haven't done the scumtell I've picked up on from last game so I think they're okay. I will say it if I pick up on it.
I'll vote TricMagic, what's going on dude? Gonna claim Knight again?
I have considered short-duration lies, typically corrected before day's end, to be a major part of Town's toolbox for a very long time. I currently do not recall a single game I have played where I was town and did not perform some form of lie at least once at some point throughout the game. In each case that comes to mind I at some point would lie in order to attempt to manipulate the scumteam.
Hector: Generally you shouldn't completely trust anyone in a mafia game, so...
And my primary motivation for choosing to follow the post restriction is RP-based, rather than for my own gain. But I understand why you wouldn't trust or care about that.
NQT had entrance music and is thus town
hector13 on Today at 05:31:37 pm
There would be no need for a town!Lenglon to mention a post restriction like that, ‘cause town don’t really need to lie
This seems like a really dangerous line to push. There are loads of situations where town should lie in mafia, aren't there?
Hector: My claim is phrased that way because my restriction, as Web has stated repeatedly as how he does them when discussing post restrictions in setup discussions, can technically be ignored if I choose to do so (it's opt-in). If I do that, and then choose to perform a specific action, very bad things will happen to me. If I never do that action, I would have no negative effects from lying. I am technically capable of lying, it is just highly inadvisable and I do not intend to lie at any point this game. That is why the odd phrasing.
(blue) meanies.Post Restriction Claim Here: I should not lie, and could face consequences for doing so.