4501
General Discussion / Re: Untamed Virus Containment Thread: COVID-19: Super Stay Home Edition
« on: May 19, 2020, 02:44:31 pm »I heard those things taste like crab and talk like people.
You’re just giving it that *mimics crab pincers*
May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
I heard those things taste like crab and talk like people.
(Maybe, @McT, but I've been thinking about all the other stored-up issues that'll spike after this.)
Just seen, for the UK: "Everyone over age of five in the UK with symptoms can now be tested for coronavirus, Health Secretary Matt Hancock has announced."
A) That's...good?
B) That'll be impossible to do. Another of Hancock's Half-Brained targets?
Breaking news, and I forgot to tune into the Daily Briefing this is probably being announced in, so I'll have to keep an eye on the follow-up reports.
But I thought the government in the UK always listened to the experts before making decisions? /s
Precisely, religion is important to the time the game is set in, and allowing the players the choice to work within an existing framework or create their own is going to make the game more accessible and/or interestingThat's what I said. Making existing religions wrong doesn't have anything to do with that.QuoteI also don’t rightly understand why you’re so offended about religions being “misrepresented” in a game which has its endpoint almost 570 years in the past. I don’t think any of the religions present in the game are anything close to how they’re practiced now.And what? Whether the practice is changed, it's still people's history. Messalians may be extinct but there's still Zoroastrians in India. And whether the people are dead or not, doesn't make slandering them fine. Again, goofy fake things aren't suitable for the base game. Ahistorical is one thing, but they're doing no magic/supernatural in the base game so other categories of pure fiction without historical credibility should be treated the same way even if they weren't offensive.
Always a risk with historical games, especially ones that are highly education in some ways. It's impossible without additional research to know what stuff the game is teaching you right and what it's got wrong.Yeah, but at least the devs should be able to recognize that it the article on Wikipedia sucks (as most about religion do) then that shouldn't be their first and only source.
A dwarf fortress book:
"Mating: Principles and Practice."
"Written on the item is a manual entitled Mating: Principles and Practice, authored by Fewetha Skinwinds. It concerns the reproductive behaviour of creatures. The writing has rare but particularly exquisite turns of phrase and it contains some asides related to the author's preferences. Overall, the prose is masterful.”