Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - hector13

Pages: 1 ... 367 368 [369] 370 371 ... 1297
5521
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 27, 2019, 10:43:40 am »
Y’remember how you got annoyed at Kit for active-lurking on D1? Yeah you’ve been doing that a lot this day.

5522
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 26, 2019, 06:19:12 pm »
hector: Your reasoning for NQT's claim of the Spin kill being a fake-claim is (at least in part) that it's an easy fake-claim since no one would want to counter-claim him, right? But given that most of the people I've seen responding to your posts appear to disagree with that idea, how does it make sense that no-one has counter-claimed if someone else did the kill? Superdorf has claimed not to have done it, Persus would have counterclaimed based on his responses and Tric already took an action during the day.

*sigh*

This is a fair point. I am assuming thus that you didn’t perform the kill? Kit made a full claim so he didn’t do it, I didn’t do it (devil’s advocating my way through my thought processes before) which leaves RGU.

Evidently Persus prefers discussing why his theory is best theory rather than telling me how and why I’m wrong in this particular instance.

Color me convinced. This does not mean NQT is town, but I guess he’s not scum.

Unvote

5523
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 26, 2019, 03:55:48 pm »
Hector
NQT claimed a useless daykill.
I'm really struggling to see how someone could write this from a town perspective. What's useless about killing outed scum and opening up the players to lynch more scum? I bought the whole town a whole day of play!

Oh I see what you mean now.

When I say useless daykill, I meant you claim it now has no charges, not that killing MaxSpin was useless. MaxSpin being dead is good, I just don’t believe you did it.

Quote
A different tack then: I killed MaxSpin. By your logic, I am now confirmed town.
?? But you didn't though. I just can't see the town motivation in choosing to attack me for claiming to have killed scum, when A. that has objectively helped the town B. there are no serious counterclaimants and C. there are a load of other players who all you know about them is that they haven't killed scum.

How do you know I didn’t?

How do we know you did?

This is my point for crying out loud. The only thing we know about you is that you claimed to kill scum.

I’ll ask you the same question I asked Persus: how would someone countering your claim make your claim invalid, or vice versa?

5524
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 26, 2019, 03:15:42 pm »
Persusyou serious bro? Tell me how my counterclaim proves NQT didn’t do it. If anyone else counterclaimed, would that prove NQT didn’t do it? What would it tell you if a counterclaim was made?
You haven't counterclaimed shit. If anyone else counterclaimed, it would be a serious accusation that would have to be evaluated by looking at when both parties were active D1, their opinions on the whole Tric/Spin thing, and a general sense of scumminess. If I daykilled a mafia player and someone else claimed that in thread, you'd bet I'd be counterclaiming. The lack of one and the lack of daykills on the dead players strongly indicates to me that NQT is telling the truth. A daykill is something I wouldn't fake claim as scum unless I was 100% sure the real daykiller couldn't contradict me, or if I had to take some flack for a teammate.

How do you know I’m not taking umbridge at this because I performed a daykill on MaxSpin?

How would you be sure if you had killed MaxSpin that NQT hadn’t tried, too? You can’t.

How would analyzing when they were active tell you anything, Shakerag still has to process the actions. Regardless, NQT didn’t claim until D2, at which point it becomes impossible to tell whether or not someone was active enough on the forums to send “kill MaxSpin” in a PM, even if they weren’t posting in the thread. Even then, more than one person can kill the same person, so how would you know either party was lying?

Thus, counterclaiming means nothing. Again, NQT can’t be shown to not have done it, so it follows the lack of a counterclaim means nothing because the real daykiller might have more shots and can’t say that NQT was fakeclaiming.

Quote
Ignore the claiming business for a moment; has NQT done anything to show he’s town to you?
I find NQT hard to read in general, but I haven't seen anything from him to indicate he's scum. He's missed a few things, but that's hardly scum indicative, and he generally takes more interest in the mechanical aspects of the game to do scumhunting than not.

Why does it seem unlikely that someone with an interest in the mechanical aspect would fakeclaim?

Quote
What whole business with Kit?
You claimed Kit had made a scumslip at the begining of D2. When you realized it wasn't getting any traction you dropped it.

Logically that means scum!me’s next target for an easy lynch is NQT lol

Not town!me poking at him to figure out the alignment of the most inactive player on D1. Notably you were prodding at me to stop there, too. Why is me trying to figure out alignment such a problem for you?

Quote
I have never once said killing MaxSpin was a bad idea. I said I believe NQT is fakeclaiming, because it’s super easy towncred, as evidenced by nobody giving a second thought about it until now. As evidenced by you not thinking he could be fakeclaiming, and that he isn’t scum as a result.

Consider that from the other side: what would I gain as scum from throwing any sort of shade on an apparently confirmed mafiakiller?
You'd be able to start momentum for a lynch against a target that wasn't your scumbuddy, get rid of a claimed daykiller, and leave people who keep being suspicious for later.

Right. Momentum that you stopped the first time I brought it up. Sensible scum!me backs off and then returns to it shortly thereafter, sure.

So you think there are at least two scum left?

NQT claimed a useless daykill. Try again. Maybe because he was buddies with you? Without checking, I think Lover is the only one that would result in a 2-for-1 on death, and it would have to be you for NQT to kill himself.

Which other players do you think are suspicious? Do you think any of them are my partner?

Quote
Have you ever seen a mafia bus another member of the mafia? How is claiming a daykill performed on mafia any different?
I've seen Mafia bus each other, and participated in it. Fakeclaiming is different because it doesn't involve claiming something that's extremely easy to disprove

Okay. How is a kill fakeclaim easy to disprove?

How is fakeclaiming a kill on scum different in this instance? Do you not consider this to be an edge case kinda thing given it would be NQT fakeclaiming a kill on a scumbuddy that was mechanically shown to be guilty? If not, why?

5525
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 26, 2019, 02:18:48 pm »
Hector, it's confirmed I killed a mafia player: Max was mafia and he's definitely dead and no one has counterclaimed. It's not in dispute except by you.

Why is killing a confirmed scum a waste of a kill??? It allowed players to use the rest of the day for productive scum hunting. As it happened I didn't think NT was mafia (and they weren't) but fortunately they were a SK and the day led two anti-town players being killed. That's an objectively good outcome from my daykill. What would have been a waste is holding on to it and then dying in the night, or using it on someone I had an incorrect hunch about and ending up with a dead townie. It seems like you're annoyed that I played differently to how you would played it.

A different tack then: I killed MaxSpin. By your logic, I am now confirmed town.

Prove I didn’t. By my logic, it’s a good fakeclaim.

When did I say killing confirmed scum was a waste of a kill? I said you choosing to use a 1-shot based on Tric’s claim meant you trusted him. Please tell me how that means I think you wasted it, bearing in mind inference /=/ implication.

Why ignore my other question? What was the trick up your sleeve that you evidently felt was better than a guaranteed sane alignment inspect?

I’m not annoyed you play it differently than me. I’m wondering why you played it the way you said you did, as I remain unconvinced that comes from a town perspective. Further, You’ve done little in the way of hunting, why is it so bizarre I choose the most significant thing you claim you’ve done to pressure and read you?

PPE:

Persusyou serious bro? Tell me how my counterclaim proves NQT didn’t do it. If anyone else counterclaimed, would that prove NQT didn’t do it? What would it tell you if a counterclaim was made?

Ignore the claiming business for a moment; has NQT done anything to show he’s town to you?

What whole business with Kit?

I have never once said killing MaxSpin was a bad idea. I said I believe NQT is fakeclaiming, because it’s super easy towncred, as evidenced by nobody giving a second thought about it until now. As evidenced by you not thinking he could be fakeclaiming, and that he isn’t scum as a result.

Consider that from the other side: what would I gain as scum from throwing any sort of shade on an apparently confirmed mafiakiller?

Have you ever seen a mafia bus another member of the mafia? How is claiming a daykill performed on mafia any different?

Are you worried about what sort of BUDDY NQT is with you?

5526
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 26, 2019, 10:31:59 am »
NQT

Hector13, your case is absurd and poorly researched. On D1 I speculated that Max (who had a daykill) performed the kill on Tea. I didn't say anything about who killed Max then. I've explained any caginess I might have had D1 if you read my last few post. To recap: I decided not to claim on D1 so that I wouldn't be a target n1. You might say that this is selfish, but give Tric's role powers are all gone it did in fact turn out to be the right move. This is a high-powered game and I wanted to use a trick up my sleeve.

Also I didn't claim D1 that I had really good info... just that it wouldn't have been town-sided to reveal (the Persus stuff etc) straight away.

Further, your rationale for players not counter-claiming me (if I had been lying) directly contradicts your attack for me not claiming. If it was unsafe to counterclaim a kill in your eyes, then why was it safe to claim a kill?

Who has the best motive for doubting a confirmed mafiakiller actually killed the mafia? The mafia.

You were cagey on D1 because you misread your PM? This makes little sense.

You were cagey on D1 because you wanted to use your powers in the night? I’ll deal with that later in the post.

Your votes on D1 were, in order, a player with a guilty result, a player who voted the player who gave the guilty result, and a pressure vote on an inactive player, where your vote rested for the remainder of the day. How is an inactive player more likely to be scum than a player who was voting against a claimed guaranteed sane inspect?

You’re not doing well reading things this game, it seems. I said it was foolish to claim a re-usable kill. You claimed a 1-shot, which is now useless. Who wants to stay alive and not draw the attention of malicious parties away from a guaranteed sane inspect? Scum.

What was the trick up your sleeve? You’ve claimed a now useless kill as a power and you’re a BUDDY with Persus. Did it prove more useful than a guaranteed sane inspect that you trusted enough to blow through a 1-shot on D1?

How are you a confirmed mafiakiller? Because you said so? Well I’m town. Oh noes, you’re voting confirmed town!

RGU

Hector13: So if NQT didn't do the kill, then why hasn't the real daykiller claimed by now? And by that logic then nobody else could have done the kill since no one claimed it during Day 1. You say it's easily disproven and that multiple players could have targeted him, but so far no one has counterclaimed it. While you're right that not claiming the kill if it was a single use is suspicious, NQT did push towards a Maximum Spin lynch, so it makes sense that he would daykill him.

I think I didn’t explain myself very well. The real daykiller is either town with a reusable kill, or they’re third-party and don’t want to reveal they have a kill. Either way, it is sensible for them to keep that information a secret from scum. And the town in the case of the latter.

I said it was difficult to disprove whether any one player performed a kill (outside of tracking/watching abilities like Kit’s Night Watchman role, for example) which is why even if someone did counterclaim the MaxSpin kill, NQT could say they targeted him with a kill too.

It would make sense for NQT to kill MaxSpin, but that would mean he was fully trusting of Tric’s claim too because he claims to have used a 1-shot kill on D1 as a consequence.  If he was fully trusting of Tric’s claim - a guaranteed sane alignment inspect - why would he not try to protect that incredibly powerful role?

He claims it was so he could use his powers at night, but, taken from a town perspective on D1, we don’t know how many scum there are, and being able to eliminate even one player from a lynching is useful to town because it reduces the chances of a mislynch. Since he hasn’t claimed anything so far this day, beyond misreading his PM and that he’s linked to Persus, I very much doubt whatever he did during the night was as useful as a guaranteed sane inspect that could eliminate players from our lynch pool, or eliminate scum from the game.

In short, he claims to have trusted Tric’s claim of a guaranteed sane alignment inspect enough to use a 1-shot kill on D1, but is unwilling to draw attention away from Tric by claiming said kill on D1 because he wanted to use his own powers in the night, which are probably not as powerful as a guaranteed sane alignment inspect, since the only thing he has claimed so far today is that he can’t read his role PM.

Consequently, I believe his kill claim to be a fake. It is a good fakeclaim because it is difficult to disprove, and he has shown he is willing to use his apparently “confirmed” kill of a mafia player as evidence he can’t be scum.

Any questions, anyone? I think the case makes sense and I hope I’ve expressed it well, at least in the preceding two paragraphs, but I’m the one making it, so... yeah. Questions?

Note: if anyone can prove NQT made the kill, my case doesn’t make sense and NQT can’t be scum, unless there’s more than one team, which I think is unlikely. He could feasibly be third party in that case, but Nirur flipped SK, and I’m not sure quite how unbalanced Shakerag wold be inclined to make the game...

5527
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D1 First Blood!
« on: May 25, 2019, 09:16:14 pm »
IcyTea obviously daykilled by Max.

You are correct, I misread that as IcyTea obviously daykilled Max.

Anyhow, why would NQT be counterclaimed? More than one person can perform a kill, meaning even if someone else did perform the kill they couldn’t be certain NQT didn’t perform the kill too, and not everybody’s Tric and - if you’ll excuse the metaphor - blows their load in the first few hours of the game.

Equally so, a kill outside the control of scum is a significant threat because it means they don’t have to worry solely about being lynched, as that requires a consensus of the town at large versus someone with an itchy trigger finger and a good head for analysis.

Whoever had the kill is obviously aligned against scum, and would probably want another opportunity to pop scum again. This makes it a pretty good fakeclaim; difficult to disprove, even if someone counterclaimed.

Consequently, I don’t think he performed the daykill. If it was truly one-shot, he would’ve claimed doing it at the time because he was onboard with Tric’s claim immediately, and if he was telling the truth about the kill, clearly believed him enough to use a D1 1-shot kill. Claiming it and omitting the limited use nature would’ve drawn attention away from Tric as a result.

Beyond that, his insistence he had information useful to town but couldn’t reveal it until today, coupled with an apparent lack of impetus to find scum (his votes so far have been MaxSpin for Tric’s claim, Superdorf for voting Tric, and Kit for silence, which seems a bizarre switch) and his insistence that he’s got information for town, really good information that he needs to tell us but it has to wait ‘til D2, and he killed scum but oh sorry 1-shot guys.

tl;dr I don’t believe NQT performed the kill, because he would’ve claimed it at the time to protect Tric from mafia, it’s an easy fakeclaim which won’t be disproven even if countered, and his contribution has mostly been “I’m useful to town really, but I can’t say why ‘til later!”

5528
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 25, 2019, 07:51:01 pm »
pfp

So... I’m feeling RGU and Superdorf are probably town, though I still have misgivings.

Still waiting on a Superdorf to tell me why I’m scum though.

Reconsidering NQT’s daykill claim as clearing, because it is unconfirmed, and they were very cagey yesterday (lots of “yeah I have information for town, better keep me alive so I can tell you about it” without much else) and did actually say they thought IcyTea killed MaxSpin prior to claiming that it was in fact himself. Doesn’t make much sense to wait to claim if it’s a one-shot. Would probably make more sense to claim the kill on D1 and not say it was one-shot to draw fire from Tric.

I need to look a bit deeper into DA’s stuff, since he’s pretty much here through PoE - my basis for scumhunting st this point being focusing on the wagon that formed on Nirur - and that’s not ideal for D2.

5529
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 25, 2019, 01:03:41 pm »
Oh hey I forgot that my wife has a friend staying over, so I’ll be much less active this weekend.

I’ll try to get a post up at some point.

5530
They've been sort of making the same game over and over for like..... I dunno, 20 years? Sometimes they add some kind of fancy online ranking system that puts forward a pale, withered imitation of creativity while stretching their cold and beclawed hands for your wallet.

In this case it's literally the same title from like, 2005 or something.

The title that was offered to PS Plus subscribers a few months ago, too.

5531
Demographics of the people electing the next PM.

5532
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 24, 2019, 09:12:14 pm »
Just ‘cause it’s easy town-cred for me to look as though I have nothing to hide and then annihilate the case a newer player puts against me.

... I jest.

You’re one of the players I need to look into and, like I said in the last game, shining the spotlight on someone else puts the light on you too. I want to see what you do and figure out your motivations from it.

It has been a good start in that regard.

5533
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 24, 2019, 08:57:05 pm »
That’s the annoying thing about being me: everyone says they’re worried about me but they don’t say why, and they don’t try to figure it out.

IcyTea did it in the last game - fine I was scum but I was poking something I would’ve poked as town too - and this one, despite the longest interaction we had being RVS and essentially just feeling each other out. Tric just says “HECTOR’S SCUM ‘CAUSE OF X Y Z” and provides zero evidence for x and z, and ignores the perfectly reasonable explanation for y. You’ve been doing the same, you just haven’t pressed me on anything, presumably through lack of confidence or the daunting task of trying to shine a flashlight in a yawning abyss. NQT did it on D1, I’m not entirely sure what their goal was, he was being super cagey D1.

I mean yeah, I’m good at the game and could provide a perfectly reasonable explanation for pretty much any position, but I’m human, I make mistakes. I’m just not going to make them without anybody shining the spotlight in my eyes.

You’re taking the right tack by not clearing me for being on the SK wagon, but... your gut feeling is there for a reason. Is it something I said? Me being good with words? Quite aggressive when people do silly things? Something you ate?

5534
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 24, 2019, 08:35:00 pm »
I don’t think you’ve actually poked me yet..?

D’you believe there’s only one scum left?

5535
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 24, 2019, 07:05:46 pm »
...Okay? Explain to me why it's impossible for that role to appear in this game.
Secret Grey Goo can certainly appear in the game. I never said it couldn't. But Mystery Grey Goo is not a thing. This is an important distinction mainly because Secret abilities are passives, while Mystery abilities are actions. The main purpose there was to put pressure on Kit for that, and it probably would have gone the same way without you butting in before he had a chance to respond, but now I can't be certain of that.

Also these distinctions are important for the inevitable massclaim, because its a way to catch fakeclaims.

Excuse you, ya cheeky bastard, for getting pissed off at someone doing the same thing to you that you did to me :p

Pages: 1 ... 367 368 [369] 370 371 ... 1297