5521
Mafia / Re: Power Hungry Mafia 2 - D2
« on: May 27, 2019, 10:43:40 am »
Y’remember how you got annoyed at Kit for active-lurking on D1? Yeah you’ve been doing that a lot this day.
May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
hector: Your reasoning for NQT's claim of the Spin kill being a fake-claim is (at least in part) that it's an easy fake-claim since no one would want to counter-claim him, right? But given that most of the people I've seen responding to your posts appear to disagree with that idea, how does it make sense that no-one has counter-claimed if someone else did the kill? Superdorf has claimed not to have done it, Persus would have counterclaimed based on his responses and Tric already took an action during the day.
HectorNQT claimed a useless daykill.I'm really struggling to see how someone could write this from a town perspective. What's useless about killing outed scum and opening up the players to lynch more scum? I bought the whole town a whole day of play!
A different tack then: I killed MaxSpin. By your logic, I am now confirmed town.?? But you didn't though. I just can't see the town motivation in choosing to attack me for claiming to have killed scum, when A. that has objectively helped the town B. there are no serious counterclaimants and C. there are a load of other players who all you know about them is that they haven't killed scum.
Persusyou serious bro? Tell me how my counterclaim proves NQT didn’t do it. If anyone else counterclaimed, would that prove NQT didn’t do it? What would it tell you if a counterclaim was made?You haven't counterclaimed shit. If anyone else counterclaimed, it would be a serious accusation that would have to be evaluated by looking at when both parties were active D1, their opinions on the whole Tric/Spin thing, and a general sense of scumminess. If I daykilled a mafia player and someone else claimed that in thread, you'd bet I'd be counterclaiming. The lack of one and the lack of daykills on the dead players strongly indicates to me that NQT is telling the truth. A daykill is something I wouldn't fake claim as scum unless I was 100% sure the real daykiller couldn't contradict me, or if I had to take some flack for a teammate.
Ignore the claiming business for a moment; has NQT done anything to show he’s town to you?I find NQT hard to read in general, but I haven't seen anything from him to indicate he's scum. He's missed a few things, but that's hardly scum indicative, and he generally takes more interest in the mechanical aspects of the game to do scumhunting than not.
What whole business with Kit?You claimed Kit had made a scumslip at the begining of D2. When you realized it wasn't getting any traction you dropped it.
I have never once said killing MaxSpin was a bad idea. I said I believe NQT is fakeclaiming, because it’s super easy towncred, as evidenced by nobody giving a second thought about it until now. As evidenced by you not thinking he could be fakeclaiming, and that he isn’t scum as a result.You'd be able to start momentum for a lynch against a target that wasn't your scumbuddy, get rid of a claimed daykiller, and leave people who keep being suspicious for later.
Consider that from the other side: what would I gain as scum from throwing any sort of shade on an apparently confirmed mafiakiller?
Have you ever seen a mafia bus another member of the mafia? How is claiming a daykill performed on mafia any different?I've seen Mafia bus each other, and participated in it. Fakeclaiming is different because it doesn't involve claiming something that's extremely easy to disprove
Hector, it's confirmed I killed a mafia player: Max was mafia and he's definitely dead and no one has counterclaimed. It's not in dispute except by you.
Why is killing a confirmed scum a waste of a kill??? It allowed players to use the rest of the day for productive scum hunting. As it happened I didn't think NT was mafia (and they weren't) but fortunately they were a SK and the day led two anti-town players being killed. That's an objectively good outcome from my daykill. What would have been a waste is holding on to it and then dying in the night, or using it on someone I had an incorrect hunch about and ending up with a dead townie. It seems like you're annoyed that I played differently to how you would played it.
Hector13, your case is absurd and poorly researched. On D1 I speculated that Max (who had a daykill) performed the kill on Tea. I didn't say anything about who killed Max then. I've explained any caginess I might have had D1 if you read my last few post. To recap: I decided not to claim on D1 so that I wouldn't be a target n1. You might say that this is selfish, but give Tric's role powers are all gone it did in fact turn out to be the right move. This is a high-powered game and I wanted to use a trick up my sleeve.
Also I didn't claim D1 that I had really good info... just that it wouldn't have been town-sided to reveal (the Persus stuff etc) straight away.
Further, your rationale for players not counter-claiming me (if I had been lying) directly contradicts your attack for me not claiming. If it was unsafe to counterclaim a kill in your eyes, then why was it safe to claim a kill?
Who has the best motive for doubting a confirmed mafiakiller actually killed the mafia? The mafia.
Hector13: So if NQT didn't do the kill, then why hasn't the real daykiller claimed by now? And by that logic then nobody else could have done the kill since no one claimed it during Day 1. You say it's easily disproven and that multiple players could have targeted him, but so far no one has counterclaimed it. While you're right that not claiming the kill if it was a single use is suspicious, NQT did push towards a Maximum Spin lynch, so it makes sense that he would daykill him.
IcyTea obviously daykilled by Max.
They've been sort of making the same game over and over for like..... I dunno, 20 years? Sometimes they add some kind of fancy online ranking system that puts forward a pale, withered imitation of creativity while stretching their cold and beclawed hands for your wallet.
In this case it's literally the same title from like, 2005 or something.
...Okay? Explain to me why it's impossible for that role to appear in this game.Secret Grey Goo can certainly appear in the game. I never said it couldn't. But Mystery Grey Goo is not a thing. This is an important distinction mainly because Secret abilities are passives, while Mystery abilities are actions. The main purpose there was to put pressure on Kit for that, and it probably would have gone the same way without you butting in before he had a chance to respond, but now I can't be certain of that.
Also these distinctions are important for the inevitable massclaim, because its a way to catch fakeclaims.