Right.. Hector, at this point, I am not one to insult your intelligence. Mostly cause you seem to conveniently step around the holes in the swiss cheese and call it Cheddar.
PPE: TricMagic
Because I wished to know if they were town. [1]If so, I'd know who not to vote for this day, and be able to lay low for the rest of it, hunting others. [2]After which, I could spend an inspect Day 2 on one of you. That is my reasoning on my choice of MaxSpin.
[1]How can you lay low and hunt at the same time?
What would you lay low for?
How is revealing you have an inspect and a guilty result laying low?
[1]Don't say anything about the inspect at all.
This is the problem, man. You say you wanted to lay low and were like "I CAN INSPECT AND HAVE A GUILTY RESULT" which is the exact opposite of laying low, so laying low didn't enter into your logic.
Despite this not being a reasonable response for any of the questions I asked, I guess it'll do.
First, I strike the numbers you put in my quote. And look, your questions suddenly don't make sense, as the answer to the first was the very quote you split apart. You say it does not make sense, but the sentence together paints a hypothetical scenario where I received a Town result, not a Mafia result. This also applies to the other Number 1 in the quote above, hypothetical town result.
Right. I separated them because I wanted to keep things contextual. You were apparently responding to the questions I asked in [1] so I wanted to keep them together, and respond to the two parts of [1] and [2] separately.
For part [1]: there was no hypothetical, I don't understand where you got that. Let's break this bit down further:
Because I wished to know if they were town. [1]If so, I'd know who not to vote for this day, and be able to lay low for the rest of it, hunting others. [2]After which, I could spend an inspect Day 2 on one of you. That is my reasoning on my choice of MaxSpin.
[1]How can you lay low and hunt at the same time?
What would you lay low for?
How is revealing you have an inspect and a guilty result laying low?
[2]Why not spend an inspect on one of us on D1 if you were thinking about doing it later anyway?
- The part before the [1] in the first portion is you responding to me asking why you targeted MaxSpin. This implies you were expecting a Town result on MaxSpin.
- The first question of the three is asking how you can lay low and hunt at the same time, positions I consider mutually exclusive.
This question refers to you seemingly implying you expected a Town result on MaxSpin, and you thinking this would allow you to focus elsewhere, while lying low. Given I think lying low and scumhunting are incompatible, I asked about it.
- The second question of [1] is asking why you would lay low, following on from the first part in that you seemed interested in finding scum, which - again - I think is incompatible with lying low.
- The third question of [1] is asking how revealing you have an inspect and a guilty result would achieve your stated position of lying low.
- [2] is asking why you didn't just inspect one of us, refering to me, IcyTea, NQT, and Persus, as we are the most experienced players in the game, and it makes sense to me to clear (or not) a vet - an experienced player who is familiar with the forum and can be effective as any alignment - as opposed to a not-vet. I think MaxSpin is a not-vet, because his meta, from what I've seen, is not conducive to effective play as any alignment.
This question was prompted by you saying you were thinking you would inspect one of us (me, IcyTea, NQT, Persus) after MaxSpin, so I asked why you didn't just inspect one of us first. I asked this because I thought it would make more sense to clear (or otherwise) a player that is going to be effective, and I don't think MaxSpin is effective, at least not on D1 if the last game is anything to go by.
[2]Why not spend an inspect on one of us on D1 if you were thinking about doing it later anyway?
[2]Inspecting one of you two does not help with an action I perform without any existing posts. MaxSpin meanwhile, is someone I wanted to check first to get him out of the way, since he is a vet too. You two tend to play off each other, and if I knew one of you was town, that would not help me with the other when you fought. You could be town too, is the process involved in that.
MaxSpin and I didn't interact at all in the last game, beyond my vote on him at the end of D1, which was made so I wouldn't get lynched. Where do you get that he and I play off one another?
How does knowing the alignment of one of us help with figuring out the alignment of the second, knowing that town!either of us won't know the alignment of the other, and scum!either of us is trying to show that we don't know the alignment of the other?
Are you just trying to justify your actions after the fact, and just used random.org to choose your target as well as your RVS vote?
And this is just ignoring the fact that your and IcyTea often end up against each other. It's hard to tell if it's theater or genuine town play sometimes.. And if so, which one? Or are you both town..
Fun Fact! You completely ignore my Answer's structure. See formatting and the Italics.
Okay. I am not a mind-reader, and you seem to expect this of me even though I asked about 5 different people and you refer off-hand to me and one of them with "you two".
I thought you meant MaxSpin, but evidently you meant IcyTea. Please clarify:
[2]Inspecting one of you two does not help with an action I perform without any existing posts.
The above refers to IcyTea and myself?
MaxSpin meanwhile, is someone I wanted to check first to get him out of the way, since he is a vet too.
This is a separate aside to the previous, underlined section?
You two tend to play off each other, and if I knew one of you was town, that would not help me with the other when you fought. You could be town too, is the process involved in that.
This is about IcyTea and me again?
- Regardless of the responses, why reduce the four players I mentioned down to two?
- If you did mean IcyTea and me, why us two specifically?
I think I have done a good job of clarifying what I meant
and it still comes out as a wall of text fuuuuu- but I am open to the possibility I didn't.
