Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - hector13

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 1293
61
Yeah pearlescent paint is like that. It basically looks like a beetle’s shell or something, iridescent and changing colours depending on what angle you look at it.

62
Was it pearlescent paint?

I’ve painted my cars in video games with that stuff, absolutely no way would I do it in RL.

You already have a sports car, you don’t need to highlight the fact you’re compensating for something by drawing even more attention to yourself.

63
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: March 06, 2024, 03:30:20 pm »
Yeah I did that a few years ago when I applied for two different jobs and got offered my preferred one. Called the guy from the other one and said “hey, I got a better job offer so I’m going to accept that one, sorry” but then got another call from someone else there who told me to show up for training. I put more effort into explaining I don’t want to work for them than I really should have for that one.

Probably a good thing since the one I decided not to work for went bankrupt about six months later.

It is just basic courtesy to let someone know to not waste their time.

64
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: March 05, 2024, 06:29:52 pm »
A bit longer. I think it went down two Sundays ago, and just came back today.

65
Quote
Other speakers at the conservative conference this week include Nigel Farage, the president of Argentina, and Mr Trump himself on Saturday.

Good ol’ Nige, getting up in the world.

67
Russian cops are corrupt, the bribes they take allow them to live an upper class lifestyle. I know this because I used to provide expensive services for one. I think they abandoned the concept of doing the right thing a long time ago.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66924404

I think part of the reason they take bribes is because they don’t get paid very much.

But sure, tar a group of people as bad because you think one you dealt with was bad.

68
Looks like Speaker Hoyle made a significant boo-boo today in going against convention and allowing a Labour amendment about voting for a ceasefire in Gaza to be discussed on a day designated for the SNP amendment to be discussed instead.

This caused member of the SNP and Tories to walk out in protest.

So far as I can tell the Labour amendment isn’t really any different from the government position in anything but name though? Basically a humanitarian pause for aid and work on a long-term diplomatic solution?

Interesting in that the Speaker is a former Labour MP, and the last time there was an SNP amendment to a vote on Gaza there was a significant rebellion as Labour MPs voted for it, including 10 front benchers (basically opposition “ministers”) who had to thus resign those position.

69
Not being creepers is probably a better decision there.

70
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: February 18, 2024, 04:50:23 pm »
From the linked article:

Quote
Notably, New York’s anti-fraud statute, known as Executive Law 63(12), is clear that a finding of fraud does not require intent to deceive or that anyone actually gets duped or loses money. The attorney general must only show “repeated fraudulent or illegal acts.”

Quote
Trump’s case involved 11 years of financial statements with values based on disputed and sometimes outright false descriptions of properties used as collateral should his loans go bust.

Among them: Trump exaggerated the size of his Manhattan penthouse apartment by three times. He listed unfinished buildings as if they were complete, and apartments under rent-control as if they were free of such rules. He showed restricted funds as if they were liquid cash. And Trump valued Mar-a-Lago as a single residence, though he had signed away rights to develop it as anything but a club.

He lied about a lot of things in order to enrich himself.

If you don’t think that’s a problem, I hope to never have to do business with you.

71
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: February 18, 2024, 02:16:32 pm »
Lol. Incompetent.

I had a similar thing with a major supermarket in the UK about a decade ago. Took some time off for mental health and then got a letter saying I had been sacked. Apparently it was meant to tell me I’d taken enough time off I was being paid the minimum amount they could get away with, but I did get an apology from the head office for it.

Then they sent me the same letter again not long after. It was very silly.

72
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: February 17, 2024, 01:27:51 pm »
I think his message is don’t punish white collar criminals because fraud is a victimless crime.

73
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: February 16, 2024, 03:16:54 pm »
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-68132436?src_origin=BBCS_BBC#lx-stream

Currently breaking is punishments for Trump’a fraud case.

$355 million fine, $4 million fine each for Eric and Donald Jr, 3 year ban from doing business in NY.

74
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you mildly upset today thread
« on: February 16, 2024, 04:41:25 am »
I’ve got a muscle in my back that gets really rather tight at times, particularly after I do some physical activity (in this instance, shoveling snow) and it’s super difficult to actually do anything to make it not tight. Like, I have to sort of balance on one foot to avoid it contracting so pushing on it with the index knuckle of my hand actually massages it properly, and even then the sheer joy of actually massaging it also makes it slowly tense up, it’s really rather silly and very annoying.

75
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: February 15, 2024, 04:59:48 am »
You would thus expect the debt to reduce in the hands of Republican administrations then if they were “fiscally responsible”.


It doesn’t.
No, administrations don't really make spending decisions. You'd have to say you expect the debt to reduce in the hands of Republican-controlled *Congresses*.
Which, to be fair, the last time the budget was balanced was while Congress was Republican-controlled, but they haven't done it since.

Also, Congresses have spent years making it more and more legally impossible to balance the budget and reduce the actual debt since most spending is automatic and basically untouchable - good luck getting support to reform medicare/medicaid, the largest single expense, in either party. So we can also look at who reduces the deficit more, which I analyzed just now and found that, in general, Republican-controlled Congresses have posted significantly lower deficits within my lifetime than Democratic or mixed (one house each). That brief period of balance in the 90s is pulling a lot of that weight, but it remains true, if less so, from the 2000s to now. I didn't check whether Democratic Congresses do significantly worse than mixed, though.

Incidentally, interest on the national debt is now projected to edge out military spending as the third largest Federal expense this year, making it, for all intents and purposes, functionally impossible to ever balance the budget again. As of right now, interest makes up about 2/5 of this year's deficit. This is going to get worse as debt rolls over into the current high interest rates. There are signs that the market is slowly cottoning on to this, which will raise the cost of borrowing even more. So, that's exciting!

ETA: By the way, if you were wondering, according to the source I'm using for my numbers, defense spending currently comes in at just under half the deficit, social security at nearly 80%, and medica* at over 98%. These numbers, to be clear, don't sum to 100% because I'm comparing each spending bloc to the deficit, not total spending - so it's a measure of how much you'd cut the deficit if you eliminated a spending group. Not that that would ever realistically happen.

(By the way, these numbers are using the officially reported budget deficit - for legal reasons, the actual deficit is slightly higher so the corresponding percentages slightly lower.)

That’s what I meant (Republican-controlled congresses administering the budget) but I get where the confusion lies.

My point against Schmaven was they said Republicans (or, more specifically, non-Democrats, but they’re basically the only one realistically) were more fiscally responsible than Democrats, and fiscal responsibility meant not spending money that isn’t there, or in other words, by not borrowing, and that’s not the case, according to a very quick cursory Google.

It isn’t surprising the deficit doesn’t increase quite so much under a (more) conservative congress, but whether or not that’s a good thing (conservatives tend toward cutting spending instead of increasing revenues) is debatable.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 1293