Bay 12 Games Forum

I don't think that's supposed to be a penis.

But that is a penis.

It has two eyes.

Quote: "As of Dec. 31, Amazon had 647,500 full- and part-time employees, up 14% from the same period a year earlier."

Holy crap, more people work for Amazon than the population of some nations!

Well, the city I grew up near/in has officially ~500k people in it, except in August, when it unofficially has everybody.

*gaming achievement high five*

"Sucker, if the entropy claims us, it claims you too. I don't want to lose a friend and ally."

"You won't be losing a friend and ally, mate, you'll be losing everything."

*cough* yes, I meant to explain those concepts in my post, yes... *ahem*

It's a touch suspect though, that you were earlier complaining the votes were tied and you've just done it again with that one, with 5 hours left of the day.

You seem to think Tric is town, then? What makes you say that?

"Brown Bread" is cockney rhyming slang for "dead".

Also the fact I have that post quoted, so..

Regardless of quoting, it's bad form, and could get him modkilled. This is why IcyTea panicked a bit when he accidentally clicked edit instead of quote on his post earlier.

??

Don't quite understand what you're implying, hector. Looking over his posts again, of which there are few other than talking about me, he still feels scummy. Why point out those things, if you aren't casting doubt on that person.

So, what am I agreeing with?

Had you responded when I initially brought up my befuddlement, you would know! Ironically proving heydude right

A'ight, summary time:

You vote for heydude in post #63, citing heydude's reasons for being worried about your presence as the reason why, paraphrased as "TricMagic tends to act scummy, drawing attention to himself".

What follows your vote is a short conversation with heydude regarding your past behaviour and why heydude answered my question the way he did, concluding with him saying in post #66 you drew a great deal of attention to yourself in a game in which you were a third-party, culminating in your apparent agreement with him in post #67. In this post you say that, despite the implicit agreement, you still think he's scum.

Setting aside the game as a whole for a moment and focusing on that, your implicit acceptance of his position makes your vote on him pointless; as a pressure vote, you have relieved any pressure by accepting his position; as a lynch vote, you're telling everyone else your case has no value beyond your unsettled gut.

I point out in post #68 (no idea why I'm linking these since they're all in a row, but ah well, deal with it ) that you appear to be indulging in some cognitive dissonance by implicitly accepting heydude is right that your play can sometimes be detrimental, but that heydude's thoughts on your play make him scummy. Not quite asking a question, but I think it's clear a response to clarify your position is warranted.

The post I quoted of yours also makes you seem a lot more interested in your own survival ("why point out those things if you aren't casting doubt on that person.") rather than the town's goal of finding scum.