May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
Most recent point I could make was where CM pointed out that scum!Egan might not necessarily action rationally. Which I'd already alluded to, but CM didn't quote me or anything. And earlier in day 1 where CM quoted Imp's post and more or less just wrote the same conclusion which was already in Imp's post.
Aha! Egan, if you would entertain me.
How can I improve my play and interaction to better interact in mafia games with players similar to yourself?
What are some things I maybe could do differently, that might help me more successfully learn about players like you?
Egan, to me, is clear. I’m not clear to him because I parroted what he said.
Well, if you were scum would you prefer to accuse me of lying about who max visited and thus implicate me as max's killer, or just go along with what I said in case CM also visited max?
The trick is everyone is a tracker, including the mafia.
I almost thought oh snap about Egan... then remembered, Hec can confirm... then remembered, if the mafia kill is a track.... then it's safe for Egan to make the claim Egan made, even as killer, because kill and track can be the same action. Maybe? I have no idea.
I'm back to square 1, except I do lean towards OMG, Hec still does read as probable town.
Hec, what the heck do you think?
I propose this.
Before any of us say who we tracked last night, we ask us all this one question.
Does anyone want to admit they went to the night kill target?
Maybe nobody tracked the killer. Maybe someone did.
Shall we magpies play that game of chicken, or is this a bad idea?
I don't think that anyone ever claimed that hac is cleared, so stop talking about it as if someone did. That's just a distraction, intentional or not.
Rereads:So, it looks like Egan and I can clear each other (or I can clear Egan, as he said it first) so that makes my life easier for choosing between CM and Imp.
Egan is clearing himself in my eyes because I visited Max and got that Max visited Egan. If he got that result, he didn’t kill him.
I seconded that, which could just be me copying Egan. Frankly it doesn’t make that much of a difference to me if I’m cleared or not.
Are you saying you visited Max, not me?
How about you Imp?Well, you both visited me. Am I lying about having visited Max?You are not lying about visiting Maximum Spin.
Are you saying you visited Max, not me?Alright. I visited Hector.
WIFOM is strong. I can see it either way. What I do not see is clear 'clearly both have confirmed each other'.
I will honestly say I visited Max
https://twitter.com/RepStefanik/status/1732138663608271149Stefanik gives the game away at 25 seconds, IMO.
So, it is fine to call for genocide in the best American universities now (depending on the context). Cool!Quote from: transcribed because I'm procrastinatingStefanik: "Yes or no- calling for the genocide of Jews does not constitute bullying or harassment?"
Kornbluth: "I have not heard calling for the genocide of Jews on our campus"
Stefanik: "But you have heard chants for intifada"
Kornbluth: "I've heard chants that can be antisemitic depending on the context: when calling for the elimination of the Jewish people"
Stefanik: "So those would not be according to the MIT's code of conduct or rules"
I'm not sure why they can't say "It would be against of code of conduct, if it was happening". But I see why they don't just say "yes" when Stefanik is shamelessly conflating calls for Palestinian liberation with calls for genocide against the Jewish people.
I'm no PR expert or lawyer so all I know is Stefanik's playing a dishonest game and seems to have gotten what she wanted out of it.
I feel that that completely ignores the historic context of antisemitism and wish for genocide of Jews these terms are loaded with, as well as the historically genocidal sentiment of the people who used them, and that even more dishonest to me. We're back to what hector was doing earlier with the "from river to sea, Palestine will be free" slogan and going "no you don't know what they mean by free you can't say it's genocidal" when in fact we do know the historical context and meaning of "free" and it is genocidal.
The fact that this is even up for debate is ridiculous. If you can't see how language like this is terrifying for many Jews to hear than you need to try harder to be empathetic.
the context you failed to provide of that discussion was people marching for peace using the phrase. Excuse me for having the opinion that people marching for an end to conflict aren’t making a call for genocide.