Ah mah gerd, the problem with coming into things mid-thread is I can't remember what the piss I wanted to say and I don't know if anybody dealt with it later, or if it's even still relevant.
Bugger it, I have 15 pages to read, you guys'll get what you get. Going through it from...
here, arbitrarily chosen.
Probably another wall, byraway. Some people may have multiple sections since I find it likely I won't be bothered to go back and edit things later.
PPE: spoilered larger sections, 'cause this got out of hand quickly.
PPE2: how the fu- you guys posted
9 pages since yesterday!?
TBFEBWOP
You know, I can't tell who's being the lazier one. TheBiggerFish or Pozzai. If I had two votes they would both be used for pressure votes now.
I'm not being lazy, I'm trying to sort out a lease. Also this thread is moving fast enough I'm having trouble keeping up with it sometimes, geez.
That said: hector:What was that post supposed to mean?
Pozzai:Why haven't you read anything else on this forum? Have you not even read the pinned threads (in this subforum)?
More later.
I think something about pre-empting my thoughts on matters, because I don't want to be accused of parroting, totes, or I was trying to make it look like I was being funny in an effort to not make it look like I didn't want to be accused of parroting, and the funny part just took over.
Nah, I just don't like it when people ninja what I want to say.
I might need to reread D1 to find content on D2, depending on what comes up.
Er... you will need to reread D1 to find content on D2, and likely D1 and D2 for D3 etc.
This is something you should be in the habit of doing

@Tiruin: I'm most suspicious of Pozzai. Refusing to engage and clinging to Tea just kind of make me think 'scum'.
I don't quite understand what you mean by that question. Yes, I' ve seen people commenting on my actions? Lenglon specifically, most recently.
Because I have something to actually pursue.
Pozzai:I wouldn't say it's that you are interacting with someone you know, it's that you appeared to be only interacting with the person you know. That said, you've stopped doing it, so Unvote.
Whoa there, Nelly.
You start this off with "Pozzai is most suspicious" and end it with "not suspicious enough to vote, however".
Can you talk me through this? Do you think Pozzai is interacting with these people actively - seeking out the interaction - or passively - reacting to something?
FoU[1] You have engaged in what I expect of reasonable RVS play. Kinda.
[1]: What part of my RVS play wasn't reasonable? Good to hear I'm part of the way there...
You're going out of your way to ask questions, though you're asking a bit too many, which makes it harder to encourage someone to answer with content (see Shakerag's response to your questions) and they all seem... I can't remember what I wanted to say. You like hypotheticals, and that doesn't really (in my opinion) get a great deal of content in the game since you're asking about theory, which is only tangentially applicable to any particular game.
[2]Anyway, you claim your day game needs work. What do you think makes a good day game, and who has displayed it so far?
[2]: Now, the day game is different depending on what phase of the game one is in. I'm assuming you're referring to a good initial voting stage.
You. Flabort. 4maskwolf. Jack A T.
Well I meant in general, but okay. Another tip: usually I assume when someone asks a question there's an implicit "and why?" attached

Why do you think they have displayed good initial voting stage games?
[3] Who has not? (displayed a good day game)
[3]:
Doll. TheBiggerFish.
The rest are kinda in between.
Now for the rest. What makes a good day game? Activity, for one. Both in the sense of post count and activeness--that is, the seeking out of new leads, following of old ones, and response to questioning. Meaningful stuff, y'know?
This was important and I can't remember why.
Meh. See next section, since what I want to say applies more there I think.
[4] What do you think this means regarding these players alignment? (alignments? I Kant England twoday)
[4]:
Now, it is a bit early, for the most part, to comment on alignment. For the most part, people look like either active or lazy town to me. Doll is an exception, and TolyK is bordering on one(my opinion might change when the experiment goes through). Doll is deliberately making herself the center of attention. As in, that's what she's going for, not creating it as a side effect of what she's doing. I'm thinking third party, because scum wouldn't be so audacious(but then, it could be a bizarre gambit). I suppose we'll see Day 2. Maybe she's a jester trying to get herself lynched Day 2 when she's found alive. Well, we'll see. As for TolyK... if he's not town, he's a cult leader, but it is less solid than it is with doll. I might look into Persus(Perseus?)' behavior in a bit, based on your own accusation, for the moment though, lazy town.
It's never too early for commenting on alignment. Never ever. You may not have a strong feeling either way, but if you say you think someone is worthy of existence (town) or you want to kill 'em (scum) that will influence their behaviour, provides a bit more content. Depending on the player, of course.
Anyway, you make a fair point regarding doll maybe being a Jester, but I disagree.
My vote on Persus was about 90% RVS, to be fair. I did find their post to be wooden, but it was their first post and I think they've done better since so... yeah. In saying that, you do comment on Persus as being lazy town... you might've gone into this later, but what makes you think they're lazy town and not lazy scum, or lazy third-party?
Other than that, and with my opening to this section in mind, what do you have to say regarding the alignments of the players you mentioned above? (15 pages and two days later)
Pozzai PPE: Nah, doesn't feel quite right anymore...
PozzaiMay've been addressed already, but:
I haven't shared them(well kind of have in some interactions) and I wont, because it breaks the purpose.
If I say "I did this and that because I hope to get these results" I murk the waters for the results I get.
There's no point in giving people an exact blueprint of what you're doing/intending to do.
*cough cough*
If scum!4mask, might be informative if their arguments feels reachy or contrived.
So... you're willing to let scum know a little bit about how to hide themselves from you, but you're unwilling to let town know how to show themselves to you?
You also seem to be awfully interested in other players reads of those that are voting you:
flabort on TBFLenglon on TBF's suspicionLenglon on TBF in generalAlmost as though you're trying to deflect attention (votes?) onto a person that can easily be made to look scummier than you.
What do you think of TBF?
It seems from
your reads that you have a much stronger case against both TBF and doll (in the sense that nobody is going to vote with you based on meta) than you do for the person you're voting for at this point, which is Tea. Why are you voting for Tea here, and not TBF or doll? (
vote count at the time)
TolykWoah, I missed this. Plenty of things I don't like, Hector:
Pozzai
...
Do you think it's wise to be telegraphing the things you find scummy so early?
Hold on, are you saying that we shouldn't be calling out scum play?
I have literally no idea how you managed to pull that idea from that sentence, or the context of that interaction.
Pozzai said they'd find 4mask scummy if 4mask's cases later felt contrived or reachy. I thought that meant that if anyone at any point in the game does that, they'll get scum read by Pozzai. On the one hand that lets the town know that if Pozzai misses something like that later, Pozzai is bad. On the other hand, it lets the scum know what to avoid doing to not get scum read in Pozzai's eyes. Since this was a post made within the early portion of D1 (within the first 24 hours I think) that struck me as a silly thing to bring up, hence "why are you telegraphing - letting others know - what you find scummy so early?"
Persus13
I don't like you.
Also, this game has hammers, so please be careful about bandwagons on people.
This is a part of why.
The rest of your post seems rather... wooden, like it's there just to be there.
Mostly I don't like you.
"A woody sort of sound... Gaud.... GAUD..."
Jokes aside...
- Why don't you like the post against wagons? Granted it's 9 to hammer, so it's premise is incorrect, but why else?
The post in question.
Well... of the 6 questions he asked, 4 of them were about other games. His comment to Jack was about the only thing of note in the post, maybe the comment and question to doll too. The rest of it, the answers he was demanding of others, didn't seem they'd be particularly useful.
- You don't like the person > You think they're scummy? In terms of what you just said. How is that particularly relevant?
When did I say I thought he was scummy?
- Is it because you're fighting over number 13? :p
Pretty much, actually.
- Can you explain why you say there's no substance in his post?
As I said, 4 of the 6 questions were about other games. Understandable perhaps to get a grip on someone's meta (assuming he reads the games, and the person answering them answers honestly, neither of which we can ascertain) but not so much to this game, since meta changes.
doll
hector13
Blah blah competent player don't want to clog this up with RVS is that a good idea kashira nano desu ne
Is what I'm doing a good idea at all, do you think?
I like this question. I really like this question. If I could make a question human and have s-
*cough*
I mean, sure, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. You're a competent player too.
I might come back to this later. Then again, I might not.
Unless you want me to not engage in a tit-for-tat "who can be more ambiguous" thing... while entertaining, I s'pose I'll go with my gut and not do that.
Sure, I like what you're doing. You're being typically verbose though, which I'm not a fan of, and you're taking up a great deal of attention early doors, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. The tone of your D1 posts has changed again though; uncertain if that's intentional or you're just having fun with what you have right now.
This isn't something I can really give an accurate thought on, given I need to see how you conclude it. Presently: so far, so good.
So, what do you think about doll now, after not much more had been said by her (i.e. after she's gone quiet)?
Must've been bedtime.
I find myself being a bit terse with you, why is this happening..? Hm...
Not much has changed, to be honest. Still got a town-lean on doll. I think this post of yours is from ~36 hours into D1, so yeah. There's only so much time someone can invest in doing bizarro things in any particular mafia game. I haven't read beyond this yet, so this may change.
FallacyOfUrist
What's your role, FoU-chan?
10) Have fun with the wifom, nano desu
What, expecting me to answer? How about this: I'll tell you what my role isn't. For Day 1: Seto Kaiba. That is, that's not my role.
Now, the question is, whether you're scum trying to get role information out of this, or town trying to see how I react to blatant role fishing.
Return question: Pick two of these five questions to answer.
1. Are you willing to provide a list of Japanese honorifics and what they mean to this forum?
2. Does your theme have anything to do with peacocks?
3. If you had a night kill that only works on cult leaders and survivors, would you use it in lieu of your normal actions?
4. If you had a self-revive that only works during the first two cycles, would you make an effort to direct the scum kill to yourself?
5. Rate each of these questions in terms of usefulness on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 is the highest and 5 is the lowest.
How is this supposed to help? I get it's a reaction test, but aren't we out of that stage already?
There's something wrong here, perhaps you can identify it.
unrelated: does everyone come out of RVS at the same time?
I'm sad there's less of it than I thought 
Of the game or of your own post? Yours seemed to have been pretty hefty. :p
My post, I thought it was longer. Not that that would've been a good thing heh.
PersusReply to
this, that I can't be bothered quoting and editing:
Fair enough. Much better post, though lol at only spending an hour on a WoT

Still a bit iffy about you bringing up the hammers, 'cause it was D1 and as Tolyk pointed out, 9 voted are required to hammer at this point. Seems like an awful lot of votes to be worried about.
OSGorigamiscienceguy
You're a mildly active, semi-competant mafia player.
That usually makes you real easy to read, and so not a real threat nor a real liability.
Who should I kill tonight and why?
anybody but me
Other than that, I don't know. I haven't read people yet. I'll get back to you on that.
obvscum, only interested in your own survival. Maybe TP. Well... probably more TP than scum, to be fair.
OragamiScience
How much of Mafia is emotional, how much is critical thinking, and how much is BS?
To me, none of it is emotional. I don't put any emotion into my game. I put a lot of critical thinking into it though. And it is always all BS. None of what you critically thunk is ever correct, especially in a closed, chaotic game like this.
but i love you senpaiDo you not count gut feelings as emotional? What would you say does count as emotional?
I mean this literally isn't important at all in the context of the game, I'm just curious and willing to piss off everyone else by starting a tangential conversation in the game

Jack ATTiruin: Tiruin.
haaaaaaaaaaaaa I like that.
hector13: Interesting first post, with a serious early vote for Persus. Won't be active again for a bit, though. I look forward to his next post. Null for lack of extended content.
Whoa-ho-hooo there, just to be clear, that was not a serious vote. It was my first post, man.
I guess I should be pleased that I can make a crappy RVS pressure vote look super srs..?
I need someone who has played with TBF before to give an opinion on this, especially the bolded section:
@Tiruin: Because if I was scum in that sort of environment I'd probably do the exact same thing, that is, cling to a town buddy that I know.
I don't know why he interacted with you, other than I guess that you, you know, asked him questions. I do know that it was a departure from what I saw as a pattern of mostly refusing to interact.
@Pozzai: Saying "Kai is like Shakerag is like Kai" isn't helpful either. Yes, you've given some differentiation, I guess, but it's not exactly going to help us understand your understanding of Shakerag.
@Pozzai: I believe you're missing something called 'context'. The feeling that your interaction was weird predated the pressure on you, as far as I know (and as far as you've said), and my later clarification that it felt like buddying was pretty much why I thought it was weird. I just wasn't in any state to articulate that the first time I posted.
How come I haven't posted my own reads: First off, a lot of them are null. Second off, I've already made my suspicions clear. Basically, the only thing I've got is a slight scumlean on you, right now. Everyone else I haven't really had much interaction with or observation of to build a decent idea.
Also, why the heck are you referring to yourself in the third person in that readlist? Strikes me as a cheap rhetorical trick...
...No, I "threw shade" on you for not reading the stickied threads, not past games. The stickied threads aren't past games (mostly). Jack A T told you that, even. So why do you misrepresent me like that?
Pozzai: How confident are you in your meta read of Tea?
Tea: What do you think of Pozzai's read on you?
Also Tea:Who is Kalas?
FoUDoll asked for a reads list a while ago. Activity's going to be sparse for today and Saturday(and none at Sunday)(blame my horrible time management skills), but I think I have the time to provide that.
Me: Town, for sure.
hector13, Jack A T, 4maskwolf: Town. Scumhunting!
doll: Townier than before. She's actually scum hunting now, so that's a plus. A similar level applies to several less active hunters, Lenglon, Tiruin, Persus, possibly Pozzai, Tea, and flabort, who I haven't looked into enough. Maybe Fish. He looks to be attempting scum hunting.
Origamiscienceguy, Shakerag, TheDarkStar: Neutral. They kinda need to post more.
TolyK. I'm not exactly sure what's going on with him. Possible third party.
Wow, there are a lot of people in this game. I'm losing track. Also makes it hard to develop reads on everybody.
How is Lenglon less active than 4mask?
Why do you have OSG, TDS, and Shakes as folk who need to post more and thus neutral, and not the "several less active hunters" as in the above line?
Tired. Will hopefully post tomorrow, 'cause god damn that was a lot.