May 9, 2024: The May '24 Report is up.
News: April 23, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.13 has been released.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
As I said before, there's no need (nor any benefit to) a pedo hunt campaign, and that in fact probably makes the problem worse, especially among rich circles. Just encourage people to receive psychiatric assistance if they feel a compulsion to molest children. That will always be more effective than the most stringent police oversight or whatever.See, I would be happy with that. Then again, we do run into the problem of 'a government initiative with good intentions gathers up the personal information of easy scapegoats, which could be used for bad things by, say, a failed real-estate tycoon with Narcissistic tendencies'.
In fact, I'm not sure why a demagogue hasn't already used paedophiles as a target.
After all, there's an awful lot of them in government and the media.
... Oh, I may have answered my own question...
Edit: I realize this topic is both not really about American politics and is distressingly close to violating forum guidelines, so I may step out of it.
Bad phrasing on my part. It's not the bandwagoning, it's the attack-dog nature that is your MO, for right or wrong, for truth or falatiousness. That you used it here to jump on suspicions and make the bandwagon roll is the problem I have. And refuse to tit-for-tat along the way. That is definitely your playing style, but it seems like it's a bit Spinal Tap in this instance.hector13. Bandwagoning scum.This is my main thinking, here at the ragged end of the marathon. But that's Hector's MO.I think that warrants a "fuck off" for boiling down my play to following everyone else
Since when do I bandwagon?
QuoteWasn't scared of that with Fallacy. But I don't want to condemn you (as I might if A.N.Other is perfectly happy to build on my suspicion) before I'm sure.FoS Hector, though, on the assumption that Fallacy isn't a straight and/or double bluffed enemy.. (Is blue the right colour for that?. Making it explicit.)
Blue is the color for that. Why not go whole hog and vote me though? Do you not want to be responsible for the final vote on someone?
(Sorry about not posting yesterday; I spent ten hours on a bus. The bus had wi-fi, but I didn't know that.)They were still Evil, though—and the same setup can't exist here, since no-one else has a coloured name.Claim's the name is red. For 100% of the games so far, the Evil role has been in red.One: the Round of Hands, in which Evils were functionally town.QuoteTwo: bastard mod.The fact that this game is bastard mod means we can't be sure of anything, not that nothing implies anything.QuoteThree: Round 20, in which an Evil needed to side with town.But the true Evil role's name was also red. That might not be the case here, of course, but red certainly implies evil, even if it isn't explicit.QuoteAgainst you.Irrelevant.
I'd like to hear everyone's rolename, please; I have a kinda-sorta investigate that needs the correct rolename to work, and it'd be nice if I could use it on someone else if/when FoU gets lynched.
hector13. Bandwagoning scum.This is my main thinking, here at the ragged end of the marathon. But that's Hector's MO.
I think that warrants a "fuck off" for boiling down my play to following everyone else 
FoS Hector, though, on the assumption that Fallacy isn't a straight and/or double bluffed enemy.. (Is blue the right colour for that?. Making it explicit.)
And this round there were rolenames in bold (underline?) Times New Roman that wasn't green.
If Tomasque broke that pattern, why not break this one?
I don't think we even have true alignments, except inasmuch anti-'evil dream' is Town-analogue.
No, it's 'my wincon actually reads like a Survivor', which it does.
Ah ah ah, but the Town not being able to kill the Evil role, that does mean somebody has to have a kill that isn't Town. And FoU's the perfect spot to put it.
How do you know his role is survivor? Do you even know your role?I have a copy of his role. Like I said.
And yes, I know my role, I just didn't read it carefully to begin with.
I'd rather not.
Because...They're referred to differently? And my wincon is positioned in such a way that I could lop off everything about the 'powerful' dream and still have a valid role.
FoU's wincon is a survivor wincon.
FoU didn't confirm they were evil, they claimed Survivor.
I don't even. There isn't even anything for me to argue against. No day game arguments. Nothing. I've got nothing.
Y'know what? No.
Yes, I'm the Minotaur. Yes, my name's red. But my win condition, I realize, doesn't require you to die. I simply wish to stalk the labyrinth until time ceases. I'm a survivor.
Then who is the actual evil role? Or, True Evil, methinks? Some kind of dream creature. Y'see, I don't think I was originally the minotaur. Something caused a change. Some kind of dream creature that released my subconscious into my conscious, based on my flavor.
A True Evil role who turned us all into monsters. Let's get claiming.
I am the Minotaur. I wish to stalk the maze till time ends. I may release my human disguise in order to kill someone, though I will be revealed as the Minotaur then.
FoU:What's your take on all of this?
It's a trap.
My wincon hints heavily at FoU being the Evil role, but it's never stated, and I'm pretty sure he's not.
Starver, reread your role.
There seem to be two separate dreams mentioned in mine - 'evil' vs. 'powerful'. Check that.
Also, *implies heavily, not hints.
It's a trap.
My wincon hints heavily at FoU being the Evil role, but it's never stated, and I'm pretty sure he's not.
