Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - McTraveller

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 222
301
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: November 05, 2023, 01:54:52 pm »
I feel like I'm being misunderstood here. I do not think that the treatment of laborers is good in today's world. I'm not defending ideas like "I have mine, why don't you have yours?"

My view is that taking from others without giving something in exchange is never a long-term positive for society. Vilifying members of a group just because they are in a group is never a long-term positive.

I don't vilify union members or union leadership, nor do I vilify CEOs. I just question the long-term benefit of the approaches of both groups.  I think both are on a path for destruction, not long-term sustainable peace.

302
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: November 05, 2023, 10:21:06 am »
Why should you get a voice in how union workers protect their compensation?

Because one way or another, everyone pays for everything… and any government (or pseudo-government) decision is usually made between two parties but imposes a cost on a third party that isn’t part of the agreement.

Think about how many things you have to pay because of others’ decisions.

303
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: November 05, 2023, 07:58:02 am »
Hey yeah I guess that’s a way to frame my thoughts - government should be protecting workers, and because it fails we get competing micro-governments in the form of unions. I’m not a fan of this because I don’t have a voice in those unions. Maybe that’s selfish…

I agree with the assessment of the difference between capitalists versus the rent-seeking-ists.

304
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: November 04, 2023, 08:51:43 pm »
Yeah so I think I should clarify my stance. What I want is effectively a universal labor union, not these piecemeal industry- and geography-specific unions.  Ostensibly that is what the labor laws in the US did for a while, and was partly why the unions got weak - the workers had their protections in law, and they were paying for it with taxes, so didn't really want to double-pay by also paying union dues.

My other concerns are the unions are targeting the employers - which are the entities that generally are actually creating wealth - instead of targeting the industries that are charging people lots of money.  You don't get a functional economy by stressing the entities that actually create wealth.

I almost think we don't need labor unions, but we need consumer unions.  Collective bargaining for housing, for instance.  I dunno how you'd swing that, to be honest, but it's an interesting thought.  Make a resident-owned real-estate conglomerate, with the goal not of making money, but of keeping prices down.

305
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: November 04, 2023, 07:20:48 pm »
I'm neither pro- nor anti-union.  I'm anti "screw those people because they're not us!"

I'm also I guess too much of an optimist...thinking that there's a way to improve the plight of the downtrodden without "going to war with the rich class" or without war in general.  Maybe I have to much faith that maybe business owners who just try to pay the least they can, realize that it's actually better for business to treat people fairly.

306
General Discussion / Re: what tv shows are you currently watching?
« on: November 04, 2023, 07:05:54 pm »
Three episodes into Travelers.  Interesting so far.

I'm wondering if it's going to go 12 Monkeys or a different route.

EDIT:
Spoiler: real spoilers (click to show/hide)

307
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: November 04, 2023, 06:09:34 pm »
Right, and all that stuff is technically illegal, but hard to prove. Which is why I said "why doesn't the union use its war chest to help those people when they lose their jobs to tide them over while the lawsuits take place?"

I haven't heard or seen any news reports of any union doing that for people not already in a union.

308
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: November 04, 2023, 05:28:45 pm »
What do you mean, "if they were allowed to unionize?"

They are "allowed" to - it just takes effort. Unionizing isn't from some magic union fairy coming in to rescue anyone.  I suppose if unions used their war chests to help people get by until they get union benefits instead of or in addition to funding strikes, I might think they are doing more to help the people they need it.

Also I don't know many single moms that can do union jobs - most of those schedules don't align with school hours, may require even cross-town relocation that isn't paid because "it's too close", and child care inevitably eats up all the extra union wage (have you ever looked at day care prices?)  So unless the unions can simultaneously increase wages for their "own" as well as help keep price pressures down for everyone else, unions are not really not the panacea it seems.

Basically it takes a community of people working together, not vilifying everyone who is in a different group... in-group/out-group dynamics are terrible. Bad enough on just neighborhood economic and neighbor-dispute scales, but even worse in international politics, as we sadly see in the news every day...

309
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: November 04, 2023, 04:46:30 pm »
Is the new labor movement in the US going to benefit people, or just increase division?

I can't tell.

I also can't tell if it's benefiting the people that need it most.  For example, I think people that are already in unions don't really need to be flexing their power - I think we need people in low-wage non-union jobs to have better protections.  Health care and teamsters and UAW jobs getting in the $30's or $40's per hour, plus retirement, even at only 36 hours a week for 48 weeks a year is still over $50k/year with benefits.

The single moms making $15 an hour with no benefits at less than 40 hours a week... those are the ones that need help.

310
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: November 03, 2023, 01:27:35 pm »
Oof just did my open enrollment for 2024 health care.  My annual out-of-pocket just for the premiums is over $6000 a year.

Gross.

311
I think the term you're looking for is "unfounded certainty."

It covers a huge swath of post-modernism nonsense.

312
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you sad today thread.
« on: November 02, 2023, 09:25:10 am »
More evidence that people aren't even trying any more (even though the headline is quite funny because of it):

Quote from: CNN headline
House Speaker Mike Johnson holds first former news conference.

(I wonder what it is now, given it used to be a news conference...)

EDIT: they did fix the headline, so you can't see it there now.  But seriously... they really don't have any review process do they... they must really be making live, un-curated edits to their page...

313
General Discussion / Re: Twitter is Dead, Long Live X!
« on: November 01, 2023, 04:15:18 pm »
I still can't figure out how people think AI is going to destroy things. Unless we connect AI to actual machines, or we let AI re-wire our brains like Dollhouse, or we just blindly follow instructions from AI without checking it first, there's just no physical mechanism by which AI can effect any change.

So if AI does "destroy the world" - it's the fault of whoever connects it to actuators.

I think the Dollhouse scenario is probably the most entertaining to be honest.

314
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: October 31, 2023, 08:16:19 am »
I really get annoyed when my kids don't move their bowls and I have to do it for them.


315
Quote from: a 7 year old
An orb is probably an enemy, so I'd rather have a bro.

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 222