1
Creative Projects / Re: Fashion in the Middle Ages: clothes, styles, and armour of the times
« on: April 29, 2013, 08:15:38 am »
The pictures are nice - though it is obvious that the book was printed a while ago as the research is rather outdated.
<authenticity-rant>
Hilted daggers don't really exist in northern Europe till around 1250. Pre-Conquest knives are almost exclusively single-edged seaxes with bone/wood/antler handles - double-bladed daggers appear around the 12th century but still have organic handles.
I'm pretty sure some of the knight's helms are 50-100 years too late for rest of the armor, and NO HORNS ON HELMETS!! All that is is a nice grip for removing the helm or breaking your neck.
Metal vambraces *might* have existed for a short period of time in the late 13/early 14th century but they were certainly not in use before then. Also, plate gauntlets start appearing in the 14th century so vambraces become somewhat redundant.
I'm also uncomfortable with the way the fabric is patterned. Twills are fine but the patterns in the pre-1066 fabrics are wrong. Post-Conquest there is some patterned fabric, but as far as I am aware, it's in the same color as the rest of the cloth.
Lamellar and scale was vanishingly rare in Western Europe - any early (Post-Roman) armour would be chain-mail and/or padding (ring-mail is primarily a Victorian construction - I can find one reference to it in 1591).
I could keep going in this vein for quite a while. What it boils down to is these are pretty pictures - not accurate reconstructions.
</authenticity-rant>
@wierd Viking/Saxon cloaks tended to be fairly plain - no real decoration on the back though there could be some edging. They would be a large square or rectangle pinned at the shoulder sometimes with tasseled ends. There is some evidence for rare semi-circular cloaks for the higher ranks. Not so sure about later - my knowledge is primarily Dark Age with some forays into early Medieval.
<authenticity-rant>
Hilted daggers don't really exist in northern Europe till around 1250. Pre-Conquest knives are almost exclusively single-edged seaxes with bone/wood/antler handles - double-bladed daggers appear around the 12th century but still have organic handles.
I'm pretty sure some of the knight's helms are 50-100 years too late for rest of the armor, and NO HORNS ON HELMETS!! All that is is a nice grip for removing the helm or breaking your neck.
Metal vambraces *might* have existed for a short period of time in the late 13/early 14th century but they were certainly not in use before then. Also, plate gauntlets start appearing in the 14th century so vambraces become somewhat redundant.
I'm also uncomfortable with the way the fabric is patterned. Twills are fine but the patterns in the pre-1066 fabrics are wrong. Post-Conquest there is some patterned fabric, but as far as I am aware, it's in the same color as the rest of the cloth.
Lamellar and scale was vanishingly rare in Western Europe - any early (Post-Roman) armour would be chain-mail and/or padding (ring-mail is primarily a Victorian construction - I can find one reference to it in 1591).
I could keep going in this vein for quite a while. What it boils down to is these are pretty pictures - not accurate reconstructions.
</authenticity-rant>
@wierd Viking/Saxon cloaks tended to be fairly plain - no real decoration on the back though there could be some edging. They would be a large square or rectangle pinned at the shoulder sometimes with tasseled ends. There is some evidence for rare semi-circular cloaks for the higher ranks. Not so sure about later - my knowledge is primarily Dark Age with some forays into early Medieval.




on a 6-7ft stick



or simply a spearhead on a 13ft shaft






