Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - MorleyDev

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 161
271
Can't move code between MGE and OpenMW because MGE works by intercepting the old DirectX calls in a custom DLL that inserts it's own code into those calls, rather than being a wholely new rendering pipeline. It's a square peg and a round hole.

MWSE-Lua compatibility is unlikely also because MWSE-Lua had to make design compromises due to how the Gamebyro engine data was structured and what it could hook into, whilst OpenMW Lua doesn't have those constraints and instead has much more flexibility to change things for a better design. Best you'd get is if someone wrote a bridging API that offers the same MWSE-Lua functions but calls the OpenMW lua inside them. Assuming they even directly translate to how OpenMWs engine works.

Performance wise vs MGE it's more different trade-offs atm. OpenMW can do distant rendering without needing to generate the distant land LOD objects because of it having a better batch rendering pipeline via object paging but that's more espensive to render than dedicated LOD optimized objects. It also only recently got a Post-Processing effects pipeline for doing things like godrays or bloom properly on the GPU. Or Volumetric Clouds and proper PBR.

As I understand it, neither OpenMW or vanilla do occlusion culling. Since in a wide open world the time to process what to occlude can overall cost more than the savings in rendering, it's debatable if it brings any value. Any FPS gained in Balmora streets might be matched or exceeded by FPS lost in a location like Pelgiad or by simply levitating over Balmora. It may be possible to add it by adding 'occlusion maps' to let it be controlled by location, but that'd need require an extra mod with those maps to actually support it anyway.

272
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: June 25, 2022, 11:30:13 am »
I've said it before and I'll say it again, the only difference between the extremists of any of the Abrahamic religions is dress sense.

273
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: June 24, 2022, 07:57:02 pm »
Usually when asked anti-abortion women will say something that boils down to "I don't want to have one therefore I don't think anybody should be able to ever have one".

274
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: June 24, 2022, 05:59:41 pm »
The whole point of the child support system is to shift that burden onto the parents instead of The Government.

I'd argue welfare support for single parents is part of The Governments job, but since we're talking about America and The Government doing it's damn job is apparently communism there... -_- Like I said, I have no objection to a parent giving up their parent status 'philosophically', but it requires the government to do its job and help support its citizens.

Of course, with the abortion legislation and bans that are flooding the regressive USA states, really Megan Rapinoe has summed up everything wrong with banning abortion outright like that:
Quote
In an emotional appearance, Rapinoe said the decision "doesn't keep not one single person safer, it doesn't keep not one single child safer, certainly".
"We know that the lack of abortion does not stop people from having abortions. It stops people from having safe abortions," she said.
"I think the cruelty is the point, because this is not pro-life, by any means," she added.

275
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: June 24, 2022, 04:38:14 pm »
Personally I'm fine in concept with parents having the right to walk away from a child they don't want, so long as it's a complete walk away. No obligations means no rights, no visitation, no anything. Legally you essentially aren't their parent anymore.

My mum gave my biological father that choice when he was trying to avoid child support by fudging his books, and pissing off is the best thing he ever did for me.

In practice, this is going to rely on their being a decent welfare system in place for supporting single parents when one of them choses to waive their 'rights and obligations' as a parent.

276
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: June 24, 2022, 11:04:02 am »
Eh, I'm not saying that I agree with the Court's decision.  But I'm leery of throwing race relations into the abortion issue without sensitivity to both issues of race and unplanned pregnancy.

The question is whether this establishes a precedent that can be used to overturn essentially any law that related to social progress, something that before this would have been an unthinkable option in terms of legal precedent since later legal precedent could be used to override earlier rulings.

277
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: June 24, 2022, 10:50:28 am »
Also from what I've read they seem to have essentially used the argument that older legal precedent can invalidate newer legal precedent? Doesn't that basically lock all constitutional considerations into the social point of view of the 18th century? How can you say that applies to this, but not any legal precedents set by changes overtime to legal challenges to race rights?

278
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: June 24, 2022, 10:37:08 am »
To be frank, at this point I wouldn't be surprised to see the Civil Rights Act opened up for discussion by the GOP and subsequently made a state-by-state decision in America. I mean, they seem determined to drag everyone back to the 1920s...

279
Last I checked, EU privacy regulations have been one of the things making it more difficult for a lot of EU member states to legislate that already. So there's been a lot of pushes for that at every level, both national and now international, and they get beaten back each time. So need to beat it back again, but it's nothing new or surprising that a faction in the EU want to push for that.

(Seriously we need to get out of the habit of describing things like the EU or UN or NATO or whatever in 'X wants' terms when legislation is proposed, these are coalitions of multiple actors and not a single brain after all and proposal of laws is not unanimous agreement of law. And unlike a government, proposals in these usually aren't done by whichever faction has majority control so you're gonna get ones that come out and get defeated more often).

280
Nevermind, DUP say they won't do anything until someone manages to square the circle on how you can have a border without having a border.

281
General Discussion / Re: Maybe the WWIII thread (soon) (Ukraine)
« on: March 02, 2022, 05:34:20 pm »
For comparison, 179 British service personnel were killed during the entire war in Iraq, and 457 during the entire war in Afghanistan. Of the USA, 2401 died in Afghanistan and 4431 in Iraq.

So the most generous available numbers still amount to entire an entire modern wars worth of deaths happening in a matter of days.

282
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: March 02, 2022, 02:33:31 pm »
I agree. But Biden doing nothing, nothing, nothing isn’t better.

Nothing? There's currently what is quite frankly unprecedented levels of co-operation and agreement going on in the application of sanctions between the USA and Western Europe. And from the European POV it's quite obvious that the USA are the ones *leading* that co-operation and are pushing European countries to get it as harsh as they can. How is that nothing? This is what the USA acting like the 'leaders of the free world' they so often claim to be should look like, not the swinging their military dick around and screaming "Woo freedom!" they've been doing for the last six decades.

283
General Discussion / Re: Maybe the WWIII thread (soon) (Ukraine)
« on: March 02, 2022, 12:45:22 pm »
Interesting point I saw brought up is that Russia may be running into the issue that rampant corruption may keep things in a state moving, but it both isn't efficient at it and is very hard to remove or move away from once it becomes entrenched. Since military might only matters on paper, up to the point that you actually use it, I can see how it'd be a prime target for oliagarchs wanting to "skim some off the top", so it seems like a good chunk of the military budget of Russia could have been basically vanishing into the black hole of oliagrach banks accounts and properties.

Bank accounts and properties they kept outside of Russia and are having their access to restricted by the international sanctions...

284
General Discussion / Re: Not the WWIII thread (yet) (Ukraine)
« on: February 27, 2022, 05:00:56 pm »
So Putin is now asking, 'Why do we need a world if Russia's not in it?'. Soooo we're now entering JRPG villain territory. "I'm dying so I'll kill everyone!".

285
General Discussion / Re: Not the WWIII thread (yet) (Ukraine)
« on: February 26, 2022, 02:28:26 pm »
Lukashenka committed treason – he made our country a participant in the invasion of Ukraine. So I declared myself as the national leader of Belarus to protect the sovereignty & independence of our country, represent it in security negotiations & crisis management in the region. - Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya

Wish it was that easy xD

Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 161