196
Roll To Dodge / Re: Airship Combat: Now with More, probably hard to follow, Tutorials
« on: July 26, 2013, 10:02:18 pm »
Most Definetly IN.
March 6, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.12 has been released.
News: February 3, 2024: The February '24 Report is up.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
@Dave: Okay here's a thing you might want to try: Answer the questions with logical arguments that are well stated and leave no room for ambivilance with regards to your intentions. Simply saying "X is scummy." Isn't enough. We NEED a why. It seems like most of the people here are voting you for what is arguably a band-wagon vote.Thats fair enough.
Dave: ALL of these questions.Because Im still suspicious of you? Which I've already stated my reasons for.
Also, I find it doubtful that you missed these, seeing as YOU QUOTED THEM.Dave:GriffionDay:
You have stated that you found IG scummy, so you left your vote on him. You also said that you left your vote on him as incentive to remove his. Which is it?I lost suspicion for one, and gained one for another.In your latest post you offer a contradiction. These are both about IG, and you say that you have lost any and all suspicion for him in your first statement. You then say that you still have suspicion. Which is it, and why the contradiction?
- snip
I did, and still have suspicion.
Why am I suddenly so suspicious? Is it because I voted you?
Why's your vote still on me?
Dave: You didn't answer my questionswhat questions
-snip logical information that you can read by scrolling up-He was just lurking and hadnt posted anything applicable until he got vote, which made him go pseudo aggressive, and start to get, what I perceived as, extremely frustrated. Which to me seemed very scum like, and I felt the vote was well earned.
Dave:
You have stated that you found IG scummy, so you left your vote on him. You also said that you left your vote on him as incentive to remove his. Which is it?I lost suspicion for one, and gained one for another.In your latest post you offer a contradiction. These are both about IG, and you say that you have lost any and all suspicion for him in your first statement. You then say that you still have suspicion. Which is it, and why the contradiction?
- snip
I did, and still have suspicion.
Why am I suddenly so suspicious? Is it because I voted you?
ICs:
I do need your guys' help on this one. How do I handle someone so... Illogical that I can't even understand or justify any of their questions taken?
IG:
When I wrote your RSV question, this is what I meant.
Why didn't you ask RVS questions to everyone?
Powder Miner:OK. That makes more sense.That's not what I meant. If Dave truly only has his vote on IG because there's "no reason to change", that means he's not actually finding anything to do. You shouldn't ever not be voting/pointlessly leave a vote somewhere due to having nothing to doIf you're not finding new people to go after, that's a bad thing. You shouldn't only be focusing on voting IG into the ground, Dave (that's called tunneling, by the way), instead you should be gathering data on multiple people. That's why you should change it- ignoring everyone else in favor of one man can often be seen as scummy.I politely disagree. You totally should go after multiple people at a time, but I don't see that as a reason to change your vote. If you think one person is the mafia, you BETTER be voting him over everyone else.
I could do this:Sounds like fun to me.
Team picks their designated pilot. I roll them against each other, whoever wins is the rammer, and loser is ramme. I put you one turn out from hitting-give everyone time to get ready, grab what they want, etc.- and then we hit and shit goes nuts.
Show of hands?
Why are you concerned.I'd also like to: Unvote Imperial, Vote GriffinY u do dis
PPE:I lost suspicion for one, and gained one for another.
Dave:
And why did you vote me?
Also, why didn't you answer my question?
Dave:I did, and still have suspicion. I did not, in fact, offer contradicting reasons. Provide evidence of this and I will elaborate.
Do you think Imperial Guardsmen is scum?
Why did you offer multiple and contradicting reasons for leaving your vote on IG? (Imperial Guardsmen)
Heres an idea, consider eveything in teh past a ranged test. And auto-ram us together. and begin a melee/CQC test.Oh, don't worry there's gonna be instructions and data for everything. I'm just showing off what exists and asking if there's more you want.https://www.dropbox.com/s/3klmi9auq261zvi/stuff.pngInstructions on how to look at those would be nice, I guess.
List of ship modules so far. Anything missing you can think of?
Maybe some kind of ram?QuoteWe can just end the test now, give me a bit to get everything ready for the next part and then start that, if you guys want. I think this has helped me work things out pretty well, brought up the issues and such.I am ambivalent towards this option.I don't know. I still want us to ram the other side, but if you feel like the test has served it's usefullness, I'm okay with it.
That said, if we don't fast-forward, the next few days can be a little dull.
I can just move both ships close together, on a collision course if everyone is ok with that. I just don't want to jump you two together and then piss off people for doing so.
Impact in italics is nearly illegible anyway.Obviously you'd d it safely.
Translation:
DaveTheGrave : You are the cop. It is near game end. Do you claim cop and give all your results, resulting in a certain lynch from the mafia if the JK isnt alive, or do you wait until you are certain you can do this to safely end thebullysaboteurdwarf threat?
Heres to hoping the town has a cop.I dont even know what this says.
[glow=blue[shadow=green[size=14DaveTheGrave : You are the cop. It is near game end. Do you claim cop and give all your results, resulting in a certain lynch from the mafia if the JK isnt alive, or do you wait until you are certain you can do this to safely end thebullysaboteurdwarf threat?pt][/size],left][/shadow],2,300][/glow][/u][/i][/b]