March 6, 2024: Dwarf Fortress 50.12 has been released.
News: February 3, 2024: The February '24 Report is up.
News: February 4, 2021: Dwarf Fortress Talk #28 has been posted.
News: November 21, 2018: A new Threetoe story has been posted.
Forum Guidelines
Dave:I think hes probably scum, but unless someone else votes for him I dont think its going to matter.
Do you think Imperial Guardsmen is scum?
Why did you offer multiple and contradicting reasons for leaving your vote on IG? (Imperial Guardsmen)
^If you're not finding new people to go after, that's a bad thing. You shouldn't only be focusing on voting IG into the ground, Dave (that's called tunneling, by the way), instead you should be gathering data on multiple people. That's why you should change it- ignoring everyone else in favor of one man can often be seen as scummy.I politely disagree. You totally should go after multiple people at a time, but I don't see that as a reason to change your vote. If you think one person is the mafia, you BETTER be voting him over everyone else.
Dave, you only keep a vote if you have reason to change it. I don't see what repeating that you didn't have a reason to change your vote twice in the same post is supposed to help, especially when it contradicts what you just said, which was that you were trying to get him to unvote you by keeping your vote on him as pressure. Make your mind up about your cover story, please? Contradicting's bad.Why would you change a vote if you had no reason to change it. Thats illogical.
I had no reason to change my vote, soI left it on him. I had no reason to change it.1. I wasn't voting for him because he voted for me. I voted for him before he voted me. I was using the "keeping the vote on him" as pressure to get him to invite me.1. I assume you meant unvote. This is probably the single scummiest reason to keep your vote on someone... It is exactly an OMGUS vote. The only reason your vote is still on him is that he has voted you. Therefore, it's subject to the same reasoning on why it's scummy as an OMGUS vote. You just happened to vote first in this particular instance.Dave is simply taking questions emotionally on purpose, doesn't understand they are scenarios, or is actually taking them emotially.2. And in reply to you, I haven't been dodging questions, I either skim over them, or are too lazy to answer them.
The former is what i think is the most likely.
He is dodging and weaseling out of questions.
OBVSCUM
2. I fail to see the difference. Avoiding answering questions, regardless of the reason, is dodging questions.
Dave: Answer me.I wasn't voting for him because he voted for me. I voted for him before he voted me. I was using the "keeping the vote on him" as pressure to get him to invite me.
Griffinpup: But why was your only accompaniment to your random vote a non-applicable acronym?
NQT:TWSYes, but not in a way that will help me determine if you are scum or town. That makes your answer wrong, I guess.NQT: Is this question helpful?Only if my answer gives you an idea about my character. Did it?
Dave is simply taking questions emotionally on purpose, doesn't understand they are scenarios, or is actually taking them emotially.And in reply to you, I haven't been dodging questions, I either skim over them, or are too lazy to answer them.
The former is what i think is the most likely.
He is dodging and weaseling out of questions.
OBVSCUM
What are you taking, and how much money, Tyler?Everything I have on me, so my backpack, and as much money as I have. But I wont need money.
Are you implying your not?Because I didnt see the question. But to answer it, if the ending of your statement is teh question. Because i dont want to wrongfully be lynched in the start of the game.Claiming town?
DaveTheGrave - What's with you? You still haven't answered the question, despite you being prompted by Nerjin. Answer it. You are being cagey and hypothesizing what scum will do. Why?Because I didnt see the question. But to answer it, if the ending of your statement is teh question. Because i dont want to wrongfully be lynched in the start of the game.
DaveTheGrave, You are scum. Who is the night one nightkill?Dont know, I'm not scum. Odds are whoever is scum is going to play the shit out of this conflict and kill you anyway, so salutations my good man.
Well he reffered to me and imperial as both having scumbuddys, I wasnt sure he was being hypothetical.DaveTheSomber: Through an exceptionally bad play by town and clever fishing by your scumbuddy, the doctor and cop have been revealed in one day! Who do you prioritize on killing?Well seeing as I'm not scum, I dont have much to worry about. The ideal you know who both scum are is somewhat suspicious on its own. Also I boted for imperial at random, and your idea is he's my "Scumbuddy". Your logic is at a fualt.
Eh... Not really relevant Dave. These are hypothetical questions. He didn't call you scum at all actually just said "If you are scum then...". He never indicated that he knows who both, or even one, of the scum are. He also didn't mention anybody being your scum-buddy or mention Imperial in regards to you. I get the feeling you have a guilty conscience DaveTheGrave
Please answer the question AND explain why you said what you said.Imperial Guardsman: Let's say you're scum. You're about to get lynched. However, your scumbuddy has been gaining a significant amount of attention as well as you. If you convince them he's scum, you can get him lynched and maybe survive yourself. Do you?Yes
This is a bad play. Your goal, as town or mafia, is not to survive. It's to eliminate the other faction. Obviously survival helps but that isn't your primary goal. In that scenario you are obviously already a huge target. Bussing your buddy would just cause both of you to lose.
