12511
General Discussion / Re: Chill and Relaxed Progressive Irritation and Annoyance Thread
« on: February 19, 2012, 02:06:30 am »
I think there is a piece of scientific philosophy (that is, philosophy pertaining to science as a whole) that might be apt here. It says, forgive me if I get this wrong, I'm not even in University yet, that a paradigm shift doesn't happen when you finally convince the old guard, the people holding the old view. It happens when the old guard die out, and the new people, new scientists who aren't entrenched in the old system take over.
Since that seems to be saying something about humans and people rather than science in and of itself, I think it can fit here. It's very hard to convince people that they're wrong, especially if they have a vested interest in not being convinced, and/or if they've thought they were right their whole life and everyone they grew up with taught them that way. Aside from a few instances that get magnified (spotlight fallacy) I don't think there is much changing of hearts in things like whether gay people are worthy of marriage, worthy of being called human. Or whether trans* people are worthy of having steady work and a safe transition.
So as the baby-boomers die out, the younger generation (assuming they're much better) should have a higher proportion of the vote, and therefore more power. Not to mention people born in more tolerant times getting in to politics, that should have an impact too.
Or something, I'm tired. Someone else can run with this, or say "Nope, you're wrong, Descan." or ignore it.
Plus, this computer is slow, so I'm waiting for a few moments for me to see what I've written, and that distracts me from my thoughts.
Since that seems to be saying something about humans and people rather than science in and of itself, I think it can fit here. It's very hard to convince people that they're wrong, especially if they have a vested interest in not being convinced, and/or if they've thought they were right their whole life and everyone they grew up with taught them that way. Aside from a few instances that get magnified (spotlight fallacy) I don't think there is much changing of hearts in things like whether gay people are worthy of marriage, worthy of being called human. Or whether trans* people are worthy of having steady work and a safe transition.
So as the baby-boomers die out, the younger generation (assuming they're much better) should have a higher proportion of the vote, and therefore more power. Not to mention people born in more tolerant times getting in to politics, that should have an impact too.
Or something, I'm tired. Someone else can run with this, or say "Nope, you're wrong, Descan." or ignore it.
Plus, this computer is slow, so I'm waiting for a few moments for me to see what I've written, and that distracts me from my thoughts.

Thank Murphy for the internet. (Yet some how I still end up covered in cute men. What's up with that?)