Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Reelya

Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 1162
376
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: September 18, 2020, 10:41:33 pm »
And there's the subprime fiasco. "fear of investment" is bullshit. The Bush administration spent a lot of money getting underserved communities to sign up to home loans (american dream downpayment act), and what are home loans if not getting onto the investment bandwagon? If anything, crippling debt is a sign that people are too willing to get into investments rather than not willing enough.

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/108th-congress/house-report/164/1

Quote
Paradoxically, in order to build wealth through
homeownership, borrowers must first accumulate some amount of
wealth for a down payment. This contribution of borrower funds
is a significant factor in virtually every lending decision.
Until the mid-1990s, down payments on low-cost conventional
mortgages averaged around 20 percent of the loan balance. Many
families had to postpone homeownership for years while they
worked to accumulate such a sizeable downpayment. Under the
current mortgage finance environment, modern technology has
assisted financial underwriters with the ability to assess
credit risk, thereby decreasing the necessity for the types of
substantial downpayments required ten or twenty years ago.
However, most lenders continue to require some form of
downpayment or homeowner equity at purchase to increase the
likelihood that the borrower will not default. These
downpayments will provide that assurance and close that
homeownership opportunity gap.

So Bush decided the way to get more people with poor credit ratings and/or minorities into the loans game was to get rid of downpayments. We all know how well this whole thing went. Bush pressured the FNMA to lower underwriting standards, and when the shit hit the fan they all decided it was Clinton's fault.

377
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: September 18, 2020, 10:25:13 pm »
The homeownership rate isn't particularly revealing of how different economies are doing. if you look at the comparisons, many places with lower rates are countries a lot of people would prefer to live in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_home_ownership_rate

378
But it's one of those things that's almost meme-level; rather than general research it's about getting published as the guy who one-upped everyone else by getting slightly more of the thing into the other thing, so basically it's a type of game they came up with in the 1970s.

But that's a lot of math research today, isn't it? Like with the Twin Primes Conjecture. Everything's so developed nowadays even small improvements are rather notable.
Math was always just a type of game. Geometry is just a type of game ancient Greek philosophers came up with to try to win prestige by making shapes using a compass and straightedge. Everything that actually serves a purpose is just an accident of the fact that the rules of math were based on physical observations of the real world.

Yeah, but my point is that someone has to be the first to come up with a specific way of playing the game, and in this case working out the smallest shape of type X that N-number of things of type Y can fit in was that game. Every possible permutation of that is then a different way to play that specific game.

Things like tesselations and space-packings go back millenia. This thing about what's the smallest circle that 27 unit-squares can fit in isn't something that you really think of automatically as a problem you'd need to solve.

379
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: September 18, 2020, 09:28:41 pm »
Sorry got the date wrong, was Jul 2019 not Jul 2020, but still i'm kinda sure it's the the sort of thing that would be a smoking gun to anyone on the 'Q' end of the spectrum.

380
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: September 18, 2020, 09:21:29 pm »
As an interesting note, the attorney who gave Epstein an out on prosecution back in 2008 was also Trump's secretary for labor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Acosta


381
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: September 18, 2020, 08:57:55 pm »
Quote
There shall be no celebrating! We are not leftists.

sounds like a bunch of nazis branding anyone with different politics like that. Anyone who says "leftists" like that is a moron. we don't eat babies like those leftists do, do we?
They are just making fun of people like you, but go ahead and keep crying.
But no, we don't eat babies, support pedos, or take over racial equality movements as an excuse to burn cities either.

You're pretty close to a QAnon, i can't take it seriously XD

Maybe you're one rung above those people who actually believe the hoax stories about Antifa starting the wildfires.

382
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: September 18, 2020, 08:49:35 pm »
Quote
There shall be no celebrating! We are not leftists.

sounds like a bunch of nazis branding anyone with different politics like that. Anyone who says "leftists" like that is a moron. we don't eat babies like those leftists do, do we?

383
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: September 18, 2020, 08:38:50 pm »
Yeah the whole change the rules thing is bullshit, because Republicans are anal blisters who only believe in contingency, not rules. The rules are what they say on the day as long as they're beneficial to themselves.

Just appoint Merrick Garland, because according to "the rules" he should have been appointed in 2016 instead of whoever Trump put in, so in doing so, things would be square with where they should have been.

384
General Discussion / Re: AmeriPol thread
« on: September 18, 2020, 08:33:58 pm »
Change the rules? The Republicans have already declared that it's not legitimate for a president to pick a new Supreme Court justice during an election year

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_Garland_Supreme_Court_nomination

Quote
On March 16, 2016, President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to succeed Antonin Scalia, who had died one month earlier. At the time of his nomination, Garland was the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

This vacancy arose during Obama's final year as president, and shortly after Scalia's death was announced, Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president. Senate Democrats criticized the move as being unprecedented and responded saying that there was sufficient time to vote on a nominee before the election.

If they cram through a Supreme Court justice if and before Trump loses office then they're massive hypocrites. They already changed the rules saying a whole year wasn't long enough to put someone in.

Trump and co really cannot shove a nomination through in the next two months without huge fallout. If precedent from 2016 counts then the nomination needs to be done in the next term. If there's a constitutional crisis as a result of the election and Trump tries to cram some crony in there post-haste so they can vote in Trump's favor, then that's one way the situation go go south in a hurry.

385
Yeah sorry I realized my error.

BTW came across this big list of packing <thing> in <other thing> research.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160304034446/http://www2.stetson.edu/~efriedma/packing.html

It feels like packing the most <random thing> into <random other thing> mainly became a field after the 1970s. But it's one of those things that's almost meme-level; rather than general research it's about getting published as the guy who one-upped everyone else by getting slightly more of the thing into the other thing, so basically it's a type of game they came up with in the 1970s.

386
EDIT: didn't read your point well enough.

Packing research goes back a long way.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10898-018-0711-5

Quote
This paper considers the task of finding the smallest circle into which one can pack a fixed number of non-overlapping unit squares that are free to rotate. Due to the rotation angles, the packing of unit squares into a container is considerably harder to solve than their circle packing counterparts. Therefore, optimal arrangements were so far proved to be optimal only for one or two unit squares. By a computer-assisted method based on interval arithmetic techniques, we solve the case of three squares and find rigorous enclosures for every optimal arrangement of this problem.

So it seems that they needed computers to prove the arrangements were optimal. Hence why the papers proving them are all recent.

387
Is square (and more generally, rectangle) packing in a circle, like, a thing? Has that been well studied like its converse, circle packing within a square/rectangle? I'm asking because part of the process of making semiconductor chips is cutting square/rectangular dies out of a circular wafer, so I'm sure there's a decent practical reason to do research on such a thing. Is it actually a studied problem, or is it considered so trivial that it couldn't be studied?

All I can find about this is within a section within this page, and that deals with finding the minimal radius of circle needed to pack n unit squares into a circle

The issue is that you're not looking at the optimization of the entire process of creating chips there, just the optimization of one element. One issue you're not considering is that as well as packing a lot of elements onto the die, they need to be easy to cut apart, so you also want to minimize the number of cuts needed.



With a square grid you can just feed it through a slicer, rotate it then feed it through a different slicer. Sure, they could stagger or rotate the elements to cram more in, but how is the cutting machine going to actually work then, and would it cause more problems than it solves?

Having everything being square / grid oriented would just massively simplify every step of the entire operation. Materials themselves are cheap.

388
DF Suggestions / Re: Terrible Suggestions Thread
« on: September 18, 2020, 04:57:03 pm »
Actually needing a specific, scare mineral to make magic sounds kind of cool.

That can be cool in fiction however in something like DF it would be too constraining. If the stuff was a mineral that you get from digging deep, then how would Elf or Kobold magic work? Elves should have their whole magic based on mixing stuff from the forest, for example.

Well you could say that all magical things have that stuff in them, for example unicorns would have it in their horns and evil biomes would be infused with the stuff. But then it's more like pure backstory and not an actual game mechanic. Might as well be midichlorians at that point.

389
https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/deliberately-made-gary-ablett-snrs-shares-radical-coronavirus-conspiracy-theories/news-story/0fa2b3c0208fb291dda20df31cc7666b

Quote
AFL legend Gary Ablett Sr. has uploaded a lengthy face-to-camera video in which he claims the coronavirus was “deliberately made and designed, and deliberately released” by the Illuminati and other secret societies.

The 27-minute video titled “What’s really going on and who’s behind it all” was uploaded to YouTube on Thursday. In it, the 58-year-old shares a number of conspiracy theories related to COVID-19.

“I feel a little bit motivated and compelled to come out and say some things that really need to be said concerning our current circumstances,” Ablett Sr. said.

“We’re talking about the Illuminati, Freemasonry fraternities, secret society people who are behind all this. It’s been going on now since the plans all started with the Illuminati way back in 1776.

The "Illuminati" thing is one of the signs you're dealing with a barely literally knob-head. It doesn't take much personal research to work out who and what the actual "Illuminati" were. It just means "enlightened" as in "The Enlightenment".

They were just a group of German rationalists who wanted to get more secular people into the Bavarian government, which was at the time monopolized by the Catholic Church, back when you could still be executed horribly for heresy. The idea that the Bavarian Illuminati were a bunch of cackling old men trying to control the world is just silly. But, i guess to those christian conspiracy theorists explaining how the Illuminati only wanted to promote secular humanism wouldn't really help matters since they think Dawkins is the spawn of Satan anyway.

390
General Discussion / Re: Tech News. Automation, Engineering, Environment Etc
« on: September 18, 2020, 12:10:19 am »
Signs are for weak meat-brains.

Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 1162