Bay 12 Games Forum

Grey squares = Rock walls [Upwards of 20’ high. Cannot be entered but can be climbed.]
Dark Grey Squares = Cave Mouth

The Party
Purple B = Bill
   Pink Z = Zoe
Green T = Illandrial
Pink = Galia
   Dark Blue G = Ganron
   Red S = Statia, Cleric of Boccob
Blue J = Lady Joanna
Black “ = Raii
OB = Owlbear Skeleton squares

Enemies
# = Trolls

Duration: 5 Turns
Affect: As a free action Lady Joanna can make an attack with a spectral knife at a range of up to 30'. The knife does 1d6+2 damage (Crit: 19-20). Damage reduction applies to the knives which are considered magical.

Effect: All allies within 30’ of Raii will receive +2 health a turn so long as they are at or below half health.

Duration: 1 Round
Effect: +1 dodge bonus to AC after moving at least 10’.

Effect: Raii cannot use his breath weapon until next round.

Duration: 5 Turns

Quote from: Nerjin on March 05, 2015, 11:55:09 am

Quote from: Peradon on March 05, 2015, 02:12:03 am

Nerjin: Do you see the buddying that I mentioned, or am I just seeing things?

Here's what I saw: Hector said you seemed town enough for the time being. You flipped out and accused him of buddying you. Now you're just sorta rolling with it. I honestly do not see where you are coming from at all. He said one thing and you accuse him of buddying.

Clarify/expand, please.

It was vague because it was a random vote, it was vague reasoning because I barely had any besides everyone else voting them out so they must be scummy in some way.

Alright, a couple things that jumped out to me in D2 as sorta suspicious.

Quote from:  hector

Roo's behaviour was anti-town, at best. They were encouraging people to vote for me sans evidence, which is what I initially thought was scummy about it.

So, Hector, you voted for roo because he was encouraging people to vote for you? I get that you might have been worried that he would start a bandwagon, but you should have enough experience to know that - at least the experienced players - would start looking for substantial evidence before they voted you.

Roo's behaviour was anti-town, at best. They were encouraging people to vote for me sans evidence, which is what I initially thought was scummy about it.

Quote from: hector13 on March 05, 2015, 12:11:34 pm

Apologies, I get quite verbose when I try to explain things sometimes.

The reasons Peradon gave when they voted for me felt very light [. . .] when in the same post he names two other players he sees as scummier. He explained that away by saying it was in the context of the question [. . .].

Why are you not convinced? Do you not answer questions in context of the question?

Quote from: hector13 on March 05, 2015, 12:11:34 pm

I didn't understand how I was buddying by town-reading him, and I don't see buddying as a scum-tell either. He's quite clearly misinterpreting my town-read of him; he thinks I won't ever see him as scum because of it.

I understand that it was a temporary read. But thats part of what makes me [worry]: that makes no sense. Why would you set up a temporary read? It does nothing at all.

So here is what the experianced people have said about the buddying:

UXLZ: Can see it.
Nerjin: Can not see it.
Jack: Can not see it.

Lets assume that Hector is a scum trying to buddy. Either Jack lied about not seeing it, or Nerjin lied about not seeing it. The one who lied about is scum, and UXLZ is town.
If Hector is not scum, and was not buddying, then UXLZ is trying to get me to pursue a town, and is thus scum.
I'm tending to think right now that hector is not scum.
There are holes in this argument though, so thats why I didnt post it.

I'm going to vote for Nerjin. He didnt really give a good explanation for his vote on roo, which comeing from an IC, I see as suspicous.

Also, I might not get a chance to post again before the end of the day, so I wanted to cast my vote now. Also, do note that we are all voting for different people, and unless we have a majority by the end of the day, we get a No-Lynch.