Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Jreengus

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 211
301
Other Games / Re: Iji an addictive game
« on: July 01, 2010, 03:30:00 pm »
Sorry, DP.

Encountered something interesting.


Nope before 1.6 she just did it.

302
Good move, more games should have official wikis. I love Guild Wars' official wiki.

303
Other Games / Re: Iji an addictive game
« on: July 01, 2010, 07:49:28 am »
I really dislike the whole reflections don't count as kills thing, it feels like cheating and make pacifist waaay too easy

304
Other Games / Re: Iji an addictive game
« on: June 30, 2010, 05:00:16 pm »
Quote from: TvTropes
To clarify: There are plenty of ways to kill enemies without getting them on your counter, including arranging friendly fire accidents, letting another enemy do the dirty work, and (in 1.6) reflecting their shots back at them. Also, machine enemies don't count, nor do most Assassins (who aren't killed, but driven away).

Emphasis mine. Must be the version then. After reading TV tropes looks like there is even more cool stuff for a pacifist in 1.6. For people who completed it earlier:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

305
Other Games / Re: Iji an addictive game
« on: June 30, 2010, 04:49:46 pm »
Just checked. Kills by reflecting missiles with the Resonance Reflector don't count against me. :3
Really? It's supposed to. According to the description for the Reflector, it modifies what you reflect to work as if you fired it yourself(in practice, it uses your Attack skill), so it would make more sense if the kills count.



I've been reflecting blasts left and right, and they haven't counted. I guess as far as the game is concerned, they shot themselves in the face. Also,
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

306
Other Games / Re: Iji an addictive game
« on: June 30, 2010, 04:29:22 pm »
I'm almost certain they do...

Also I managed to not kill the first boss in a pacifist run back in a version when that was supposed to be impossible.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

307
This whole discussion is insane.
What happen when you ban gun? Well, less death by gunwound.
All gun bans do is make owning a gun illegal. If a criminal is committing a crime, why not also bring a gun anyway?
I find this argument annoying, I'm not saying I agree with Phmcw's post but if you're going to commit a crime why not rape someone anyway? After all you're already committing a crime, it's not like adding extra crimes on top will in anyway be worse for you if you're caught. Hell you might as well kidnap and kill them too.

Criminals break crimes by definition, but they don't break all crimes. Just those that pay off in a risk/benefit analysis and in a country where guns are illegal they don't need guns to do the majority of crimes because they aren't likely to get shot, so why risk carrying one? Now I'm not saying they wont use other weapons or use guns in some cases but the argument of "Criminals break laws therefore they will all carry guns anyway." is flawed.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

308
Are you saying the guy couldnt easily have killed him with a bow, crossbow, explosive, knife or poison?

Actually that was the most retarded thing I've heard today, I hope I've been trolled.
Sorry, I missed this. Look up the history and you'll have your answer.
Because bows can't be used immediately after eating a sandwich?

309
General Discussion / Re: There's a Hole in the Bottom of the Sea
« on: June 28, 2010, 08:38:29 am »
Let's view the other angle. BP stands for "BRITISH petroleum". They have no requirement to be anywhere near the US. I don't know how people here feel, but I knew exactly what my previous employer had in connection to BP.
No it doesn't, they changed their name from British Petroleum to BP. BP doesn't stand for anything.
That's a seriously weak argument. They're the same f**king company. Just because they changed their name doesn't change the fact that their main HQ is in Westminster, that their CEO and most of their board are British and that they are the direct corporate descendant of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company.

A better argument is that despite their name and pedigree, they're a huge multinational zaibatsu, not a national oil industry. And I'm all for putting the "execute" in "executive". Once you've stolen/damaged/etc >$1 billion, your life should be forfeit. Pull Bernie Madoff out of storage, drop him and Hayward both into the middle of an oil patch and light that puppy up.

Seriously...we live in a society where somebody stealing a lawn mower gets hit with more severe penalties than these guys. That's not going to change until we make a few (preferably messy) examples.
You misunderstand I wasn't saying that it made any difference, merely pointing out a common misconception.

310
General Discussion / Re: There's a Hole in the Bottom of the Sea
« on: June 28, 2010, 06:27:35 am »
Let's view the other angle. BP stands for "BRITISH petroleum". They have no requirement to be anywhere near the US. I don't know how people here feel, but I knew exactly what my previous employer had in connection to BP.
No it doesn't, they changed their name from British Petroleum to BP. BP doesn't stand for anything.

311
General Discussion / Re: Have a Cigar, Me
« on: June 27, 2010, 03:39:56 pm »
I thought he was a cannon.

312
General Discussion / Re: Confessions
« on: June 27, 2010, 01:08:33 pm »
Yeh, I hate those people who are always so nice and successful and plain better than you, but you can't help but like them. How dare they make me like them when I ought to resent the bastards!!!

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

313
General Discussion / Re: Aquizzar!
« on: June 27, 2010, 07:31:53 am »
sigh, what is this ?


do I have to shoot someone again ?
You don't have to, but please do.

Also after reading this thread I scanned the first two pages for the thread mentioned and couldn't see it. Later I actually saw the thread in question, I think my brain subliminally blocked it to prevent the sheer horror that it was bound to contain based on the title.

314
Other Games / Re: Team Fortress 2: Now for Mac! "Get in here!"
« on: June 27, 2010, 05:15:49 am »
A rag soaked in pee and rapped around his bare head. Once the sniper gets some kind of rag as a weapon that can be included in the recipie too.

315
General Discussion / Re: The Aristocrats joke
« on: June 27, 2010, 05:14:40 am »
Well I read one version, then I read wikipedia's explanation to discover why it was supposed to be funny or have any humour value whatsoever. I honestly don't even understand it, the punchline just seems to be a complete non sequitur.

Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 211