4
« on: December 27, 2021, 02:26:09 pm »
Hey so I had an idea. Hear me out.
A new electoral system where instead of voting for one person, you can vote for or against each person who's running.
For each candidate, their total approval (votes for minus votes against) is recorded as net voting power. For example, Jane Smith receives 5,532 + votes and 2,211 - votes, resulting in a total of 3,321. John Smith (no relation) gets 11,323 + votes and 10,026 - votes, resulting in a total of 1,297.
Those with the highest net voting power are appointed to a council, where they retain that NVP. If a bill comes up and Jane votes for it while John votes against it, her 3,321 votes outweigh his 1,297 votes. Either John needs to build a coalition of other controversial or minority groups, or it's not getting passed.
This is a strongly consensus-driven polity. Extreme positions are forced out, while those who are able to argue respectfully with the other side excel. Also, EVERY vote counts; first, gerrymandering is impossible, and second, the more votes past positive approval a candidate gets, the more powerful they are. Most importantly of all, every _single_ person in the government has at least a positive approval rating.
It works at small scales and large. I recommend that the size of the committees is something like the cube root of the population.