Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Frumple

Pages: 1 ... 717 718 [719] 720 721 ... 1929
10771
Other Games / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild
« on: June 20, 2016, 08:42:35 pm »
Hell, I'm not particularly into the lore either, I just sunk way too much time into LttP when I was a kid. Dwarf guy reforges the master blade part way through the game, which doubles its damage. Absolute late game (very literally right before the final boss), you can throw either the master sword or its improvement into some water and a fat fairy will toss back out a golden sword that's double the strength of the tempered sword.

E: Actually, I kinda' forget. Did the fat fairy ever show up again? Somewhere else in the franchise.

10772
Other Games / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild
« on: June 20, 2016, 07:29:27 pm »
Who knows. It didn't take that long for that dwarf to jack it up, did it? And the fat fairy just kinda' tossed it back out, jacked up again. It may not have taken long at all, and only the goddesses know what it was made out of. It could be very dirty indeed.

10773
Other Games / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild
« on: June 20, 2016, 07:23:25 pm »
Or they could be regulated for use in extralegal fairy imprisonment or somethin'. No longer for various questionable liquids or powders, ganon's curse has made it so the bottles may only hold the writhing forms of the sentient and still living.

10774
Other Games / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild
« on: June 20, 2016, 07:14:10 pm »
E: Or not just ganon, really. I can see you rolling up to the pedestal in the LttP forest, and there's one of those ball and chain guys waiting for you, twirling the pedestal around.

10775
Other Games / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild
« on: June 20, 2016, 06:46:07 pm »
I fail to see the problem.

I also flail to see the problem, and am now thinking of him attaching the rock to a rope.

E: Or not just ganon, really. I can see you rolling up to the pedestal in the LttP forest, and there's one of those ball and chain guys waiting for you, twirling the pedestal around. Just think of what the blade beam things would look like coming off of that. Hyrulian sonic boom.

E2: Oh gods, it's becoming more elaborate. We touhou now. Bullet hell for the blade.

E3: I think the part when it reaches half health where it starts making afterimages/clones and there's like six rock-encased master swords whirling around the room is the best part.

10776
Other Games / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild
« on: June 20, 2016, 05:47:19 pm »
Not going to lie, now I've got a mental image of ganon running around with the master sword, it still stuck in a rock.

10777
General Discussion / Re: Gun control
« on: June 20, 2016, 05:21:21 pm »
That civil war thing again. Do we actually have any meaningful indication a substantial revolution (i.e. hundreds of thousands of lives lost) would occur if they just straight up kicked out the 2nd and banned firearms entirely? Some sort of poll ran that had X% of the population saying they would start killing people if it happened, anything along those lines? I know there's people that bluster about it, and claim their millions of guns and terrorist gun owners waiting in the bushes and whatnot, but do we have anything particularly concrete supporting that position? Anything pointing to it being something beyond a fringeward flight of fancy?

Nevermind no one actually wants that. We know many/most people do support gun control to some degree. We know most people aren't willing to go out and murder other people, basically regardless, and especially not when there's not a direct threat to their lives. In the face of that, it's... kinda' doubtful a revolution worth the title would occur, y'know? And almost certainly not one that would match or surpass our current firearm fatality numbers, if such a repeal had teeth and actually cut out firearm suicides and homicides outside of those folks in open rebellion. Maybe some domestic terrorism campaigns would be expected, but 30k dead and 80+k injured per year is a pretty serious bar to pass. Half of that would be a pretty serious bar to pass, as insurgencies go. You're talking a terrorism campaign with a body count that would approach that of the rest of the world's terrorism campaigns combined (either the full 30k or the 15k, depending on the year chosen in recent history). Like. I know we have some murderous bastards in this country. But that's a helluva' claim.

I guess what I'm asking is, if the NSA and such hasn't led to open rebellion, despite shitting all over amendments that have considerably greater import for our liberty and whatnot, why should we assume a gun ban would? It's complete fairy world fancy as a consideration, since basically no one sane in this country actually wants a full ban, but still. How are folks so sure the fervor would last in the face of it actually happening?

"Well-regulated" does not imply government regulation, it means "well-functioning" or "effective". Brush up on your 18th-Century English. Furthermore, the meaning of the Second Amendment is quite clear.
Do try to remember that for the first two centuries of this country's existence, the 2nd amendment was not interpreted as an individual right; I have living family that predates the point that legal interpretation appeared to basically any extent and certainly the point it was considered with any seriousness. Fulfillment of the amendment's mandate pretty clearly does not require anyone and everyone to be able to keep and store weapons in the home.

Your hostility to pretty much any change or questioning of the system is why we're still referring back to statements made over 200+ years ago that has no basis in reality anymore.
See, this isn't even accurate. This individual mandate is something that started popping up in the 60s. We're referring to statements made <=58 years ago when we talk about it; 200 years ago the right of the government to take weapons away from the individual wouldn't have been much of a question. You as an individual had a right to a gun then much like the police have a legal mandate to protect you in particular today.

10778
General Discussion / Re: Gun control
« on: June 20, 2016, 10:27:06 am »
Lots of stuff contributes more to the US homicide rate than guns, ant. Has never really been a question about that.

10779
General Discussion / Re: Gun control
« on: June 20, 2016, 09:14:13 am »
Ahhhh yes. I'm not American either, can you edit the list Frumple? So:
Done.

I was talking about home made guns, but if guns where banned, i would not be surprised if the same thing that happened during prohibition happened again, just replace booze with gun.
See, having known a gunsmith and being somewhat aware of what goes into making a gun besides, I very much would be surprised if anything even remotely resembling the scale of the prohibition happened. The materials and setup to make a gun worth a damn is a lot harder to hide than a still up in the mountains or out in the woods. Actually making one in a home shop instead of a factory also tends to take a fair amount of time. Single batch of alcohol did, too, but it only took one or two people to produce sizable batches. Firearms manufacturing is... not quite as easy to scale up. Unless you're suggesting there's going to be people hiding gun factories en masse.

Which... if that was a state of things that could happen and be maintained, we'd probably have a hell of a lot more problems than a gun equivalent of the prohibition.

10780
General Discussion / Re: Gun control
« on: June 20, 2016, 08:54:47 am »
Yeah, one I've got in the spoilers at the bottom is merged, though I didn't try to incorporate Erkki's outside-list stuff.
The thing is, though, I haven't heard of a massacre which was foiled because of people owning a gun.
Because generally people who go around massacreing people do so in places law abiding people aren't allowed to take their guns.
What? No, most mass shootings in the definition you usually see used (4+ killed) generally happen where concealed carry at the very least is okay. A fair number of the ones that are more spectacular occurred outside of schools/government compounds/hospitals/etc., too. We probably hear about the ones in schools and whatnot more than the rest, but there's plenty of the things at workplaces, shopping centers, churches, so on, so forth. Places where any no-gun policies would be strictly ad-hoc and not particularly legally binding.

It is fairly untrue that no mass shooting has been stopped by folks that are armed and not law enforcement (there was something like five between '00 and '13 in the US, ferex, according to the FBI. To give reference, that's five out of about 33, going by this data -- which is fairly conservative in tracking to boot -- around 25 of which would have been in areas concealed carry was legal to one extent or another). It's also fairly untrue that it's particularly common, even in areas where it is legal for civilians to carry. And beyond that, it's... fairly arguable it would actually be desired, if it were an option. Your average civilian CCP holder isn't exactly trained for situations like a gunner in a crowded room, and there are a lot of ways that can cause problems. There's a (number of) reason(s) cops tend to be really gorram leery about armed civilians being near a crime scene, active or otherwise.

Might be less troubled, m'self, by that last bit vis a vis the state of things in the US if we made any attempts that aren't complete shit at helping ensure civilian weapon holders are even remotely competent, but... y'know. I've been through firearms safety training, most of the way through the concealed carry certification process (never actually sent in the paperwork, mostly due to not having 200 bucks on hand for it, but that was the last step involved and everything else was in order). We kinda' don't. It's better or worse based on state, but... yeah. And that's not getting into whether we actually want our population to be acting like it's under siege from itself 24/7.

... y'also kinda' have to remember that most of the folks that do that kinda' thing don't exactly choose their venues based on expected resistance. It may be some degree of influence, but they've usually got bigger reasons for doing that shit.

They aren't even that hard to make.
... mate, have you ever actually made a gun? Been around someone that did? 'Cause I've actually helped out a gunsmith before, a bit. It's a pretty extreme deception to call a gun easy to make. A shitty gun is easy to make -- a modern firearm, that's accurate and not substantially more likely to jam or explode on you, is not even remotely easy to build. It's actually pretty bloody hard! Fairly precision machining involved, and a good amount of skill. Factory setting can stamp 'em out due to being specifically tooled for it, but outside of that, not so much.

Shoddy pipe guns or whatever aren't too difficult, sure, but those are also generally less dangerous than a ruddy knife. If folks were limited to home-made firearms, you could pretty much guarantee there'd be a lot less dead people involved when they start getting fired off.


10781
Other Games / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild
« on: June 19, 2016, 10:48:25 pm »
Do they, though? Most lengthy franchises are... not the most consistent when it comes to continuity. If nothing else, zelda basically embraces that and provides for something approaching an explanation for it.

10782
General Discussion / Re: Things that made you go "WTF?" today o_O
« on: June 19, 2016, 10:05:06 pm »
... there's apparently been someone making updates to IVAN for a little over a year now, sporadically. Huh.

10784
Other Games / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild
« on: June 19, 2016, 08:02:21 pm »
Oh gods. That music in the steppe talus video. Is driving me goddamn insane. There's this one friggin' part of it.   

Which I figured out where it was coming from part way through typing this. Bloody lost woods. The BotW's bit starts at ~0:21 in that video furt linked; it's just, like. A single strike or whatever the hell the musical term for it is, and it's enough off that it's fairly tenuous. But if that is not a gorram reference I don't know what the hell it is. It's almost a match to the bit starting around the sixth or seven second of that linked bit. Just off enough that it drove me up the bloody wall until I puzzled out why it was bothering the hell out of me.

10785
Other Games / Re: The Legend of Zelda: Breath of The Wild
« on: June 19, 2016, 06:13:34 pm »
Honestly for a Ganondorf-ruled Hyrule it looks amazingly... non-dark-and-dreary-and-full-of-death-y. Especially considering what seven years of Ganondorf did in OoT.
Ganon's been stuck inside a barrier surrounding the castle for the past century
... also, uh. At least what I saw it... did look pretty dreary. Colorful (but kinda' muted, too),  but a lot of what you see is some variation of broken or badly degraded. Dunno what the towns will look like, but the wilderness and ruins and whatnot look very much "after the end". Art style honestly looks like about the thematically darkest a zelda game's really indulged in, even TP or dark world stuff, to me.

Pages: 1 ... 717 718 [719] 720 721 ... 1929