Bay 12 Games Forum

Well, you see, when a priest loves an amulet of the dead very, very much... well. Stuff happens, and then longdead! It's a mysterious process fraught with peril and bone splinters in uncomfortable places.

Sweet zeus he's unironically spewing evopsych. Not even the gods can save him now.

... what I didn't know was that the behavior was a actually limited to those three. Thought all the bullet-kin style enemies could, given a chance. Wiki definitely suggests it is, though.

So its less 'You can take a break now' and more 'GO TAKE YOUR BREAK NOW.'

Yeah... pretty sure at some point, some organizations got tired of dealing with workers comp claims due to overwork. Also union stuff, o'course. And some of them actually listening to the time/productivity optimization folks that had the (completely un)startling revelation that giving workers the occasional break meant their performance amazingly didn't degrade as quickly. Buncha' reasons, really. So the breaks became mandatory!

There's ways around it, mind. Usually it's not breaks at a certain time so much as at least X breaks per certain hours of work (functionally it ends up as at a certain time just due to scheduling, but still). If the person in question doesn't meet the time requirements, and just happens to have a replacement come in right when it's about time for a break, weeeeellllll...

Due to high demand this may take longer than the games are available to get in this way.

Yeeaaah, it's kinda' looking like that. Can't seem to actually see when stuff starts timing out, unfortunately. Anyone able to share when y'start losing access?

As was the massive flurry of articles claiming that Trump would never release where the millions of dollars he raised for veterans' organizations would go, then went out of their way to bash it anyway when he did. The media is dishonest as all hell about both Trump and Sanders, and nearly everyone who's been paying attention has worked that out. I could spend half an hour posting links to ridiculous hit pieces on both of them, but I'm going to bed.

You must really hate how the media's been treating clinton for the last couple of decades, then. Trump and Sanders have barely even scratched the surface of the media's vacuous hate-news machine compared to what's been done about her over the years, and that stuff ain't exactly slowed down this election cycle.

... though I'd be pretty wary about anything involving trump and money, honestly -- the initial media scrutiny regarding those donations didn't strike me as particularly out of line. Dude did make a good chunk of money basically being the legal equivalent of a scam artist, and there's not really any way to reframe that to be more positive. Plus he's literally said part of the reason he's running is because people like him need to be kept a better eye on, vis a vis regulation and whatnot, and that he's basically a big enough scumbag to know where all the loopholes are. You keep someone with his history well in sight and rode hard when it comes to fiscal anything. Keep any politician such, really, but ones o'trump's mien in particular.

Better than laughter does, usually, near as I've been able to tell. Tragedy sells like hotcakes.

Of course, the real thing you do is figure out what proportion of each gets optimized amount of income, rather than focusing on one or the other. Might as well do both and suck the teat of both markets!

To respond to Frumple's posts:

He didn't slip through. He didn't slip through. He didn't slip through.

He climbed over. The fence is supposedly only three feet high, but still "exceeds standards."

Fair enough. That... kinda' makes it worse, though. That's a hell of a lot harder to miss.