True, if we can just assume a can opener of lavish funding, many problems are easy to solve.
*shrugs* It being difficult to get the can opener doesn't make the problem itself more
complex. Just makes getting the resources (be it fiscal, work hours, or public sentiment) to fix it more of a slog, and even that is usually pretty bloody
simple, just frustrating and time consuming.
And @strife, I'm well aware of that. I've actually gone through, y'know, a concealed carry course, gun safety training, etc., and something like half my bloody family has seen some degree of either direct military service or contract work for supporting operations. You'd also do well to note the mass shootings on the noted sites and the armed and train folks getting gunned down were separate things. Still, if you have any idea of a better example than those, you're welcome to give it. You're pretty much guaranteed to still find people getting gunned down, probably at least a few times en masse. Armament and training only does so much (that is, basically nothing) to stop a gunner before they start killing people. Most of the time we actually see someone stopped before an attack, it's not by a bullet.
Also would be welcome to note that I didn't say a damn thing about cutting into gun ownership in that statement. Just noting that we do, in fact, have multiple examples of areas with multiple armed and trained individuals on site involved in mass shootings, and it does jack to effect the rhetoric involved. There are no counter examples to that crowd, just insufficiency and (notably rare) examples they crow as success stories.